- Oct 8, 2019
- 5,262
- 5,035
Or is it so different that there is no relation? If there is a correlation what kind of 40 times would guys like McDavid, Larkin, Kreider run?
There's skating speed and acceleration. Top speed is usually from power in your legs, although constantly moving your feet can help if you don't have powerful legs.Or is it so different that there is no relation? If there is a correlation what kind of 40 times would guys like McDavid, Larkin, Kreider run?
There's skating speed and acceleration. Top speed is usually from power in your legs, although constantly moving your feet can help if you don't have powerful legs.
Quick feet can get you accelerating faster, although powerful legs can get you that first push off you need to get going. So no, being fast in the 40 doesn't completely translate to ice.
There's skating speed and acceleration. Top speed is usually from power in your legs, although constantly moving your feet can help if you don't have powerful legs.
Quick feet can get you accelerating faster, although powerful legs can get you that first push off you need to get going. So no, being fast in the 40 doesn't completely translate to ice.
Technique absolutely matters. I mean it matters when you run as well. But having good Technique and power in you legs will give you strong powerful strides and on ice won't translate to running because it's different.
Quick feet is important for acceleration, and especially for rapid cross overs where each push makes you accelerate faster.
But straight ahead speed is actually about lengthening strides and extending the leg back as far as possible, so usually you don’t want quick feet as it means you aren’t extending and will develop an inefficient stride.
so yes, quick feet = speed when starting and turning, but quick feet hurts speed when going north south.
Or is it so different that there is no relation? If there is a correlation what kind of 40 times would guys like McDavid, Larkin, Kreider run?
Yes.I hear what you're saying but it seems that's more about technique. Aren't you confounding "quick feet" a bit with stride length? I mean, if two players at speed have the same stride length, and one of them completes each stride 20% faster, he's going to have more speed, no?
Can say the same, it's a large advantage from a dead stop.Definitely.
Skating mechanics & technique obviously can increase your speed greatly, but it still operates within the realm of what your athletic ceiling is. For example I didn't play ice hockey until later than some of my friends but I've always been an incredibly fast sprinter. After a couple years even though they were still technically better skaters than me, I was faster than some of them because of that athletic advantage.
But if you take a fast runner and a slow runner, give them both skating lessons so their technique are at the same level, the fast runner will be the much faster skaterIf you're a fast runner but have never skated, you're not going to be a fast skater. If you're a fast skater, good chance you have the strength and twitch muscles to be a fast runner. Skating is a very difficult thing to learn properly if you don't start young.
Sure...wrong !
again wrong, its not a matter of technique as we have to assume its on the same level for everyone and in that case more powerful legs are an advantage if we are talking about speed... be it food speed or skating speed and its not really about top speed anyway as it doesnt matter if u take a few laps to reach ur top speed as bures/mcdavids beat u between the blue lines. - the question about skating speed in hockey is actually a question about who can accelerate faster which is a debate about muscle memory and muscle cross sections.