You can’t be calling someone out for using the words that you said and forming a point lol. You’re take had holes in it and you opened Pandora’s box by making a statement by saying you’re not elite if you can’t win awards. Many of the players you and others deem as elite have not won a single individual award (Tkachuk being one of them). In this circumstance I don’t see how he took it to the absurd, he’s using the criteria you very clearly outlined to establish your position.
At the end of the day they need to win and he needs to put it on the line and stop playing scared. This is what AI has to say.
Is Mitch Marner Overpaid?
To determine whether Mitch Marner is overpaid, we need to analyze several factors, including his performance statistics, contract details, and comparisons with other players in the NHL.
1. Contract Details: Mitch Marner signed a six-year contract worth $10.9 million per year in 2019. This contract places him among the higher-paid players in the league. However, it is essential to consider how his performance aligns with this salary compared to other elite players.
2. Performance Statistics: Since signing his contract, Marner has played 576 games, scoring 194 goals and providing 445 assists for a total of 639 points. This results in an average of approximately 1.11 points per game (PPG). When comparing his playoff performance since signing the deal, he has played 37 games with 33 points (6 goals and 27 assists), which translates to a PPG of approximately 0.89.
In contrast, other players who signed similar contracts during that time frame have had different levels of success:
Brayden Point has a PPG of approximately 1.06 in playoffs and has won two Stanley Cups.
Mikko Rantanen boasts a PPG of around 1.37 in playoffs and has one Stanley Cup.
These comparisons highlight that while Marner is productive during regular seasons, his playoff performance does not match up favorably against some peers who have achieved greater success in postseason play.
3. Market Value Considerations: The information provided suggests that Marner’s market value on an extension may be less than what he currently earns ($10.9 million). If he were to enter free agency, he might seek more lucrative offers based on his potential as a player rather than just past performance metrics.
4. Team Context: Marner’s contributions are also contextualized within the Toronto Maple Leafs’ roster dynamics. The team has faced challenges in the playoffs due to injuries and management decisions that may have impacted overall team success rather than solely individual performances.
5. Conclusion: Given these factors—his high salary relative to playoff production compared to peers and potential market value—it can be argued that Mitch Marner is overpaid, especially when considering how much other players with similar or better playoff performances are earning or would command on the open market.
Best part. Worth less on am extension than he is paid now.
Same AI doing Nylander....the last part.
In summary:
Performance: Rising star status with impressive statistics.
Contract Context: Competitive salary relative to peers but raises questions about team success.
Comparative Analysis: High salaries do not guarantee championships; other teams manage better under different financial structures.
Ultimately, if Nylander can maintain or improve upon his current output while contributing positively to team dynamics and playoff success, then his contract will likely be viewed as a sound investment rather than an overpayment.
torontosun.com
