Does Kris Letang fall into the category of a Hall of Famer to you?

BlueAzN

Registered User
Jan 3, 2009
945
355
In South Carolina
When he's done he's going to have:

1200+ games
800+ points
3 Stanley Cups
8 top-10 Norris finishes
2 second-team all-star

He's getting in. The only conversation to be had is whether the HoF's standards are too low for your liking, because he's definitely getting in.
I don't have a problem with your take fyi, just commenting on one of the stats listed here. The fact that TOP TEN Norris finishes is a defining stat for Letang to get in the HOF says it all. Top 3? Okay I can swallow that, but f***in top 10? TOP TEN? I mean what a f***in joke.
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
19,105
5,337
Saskatchewan
Yes he will get into the hall of fame.

Look at the criteria to get in. Look at Letangs career.

If you are a person that wishes less players made it well that's only a wish in dream land.
We have to deal with reality.
 

Lomez

Too Awesome for Top 100
Mar 29, 2009
7,429
1,119
PGH, PA
He'll probably get in, but he doesn't seem like a hall of fame to me. Maybe I've just seen too many of his bonehead plays...
 

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,427
1,788
The fact that TOP TEN Norris finishes is a defining stat for Letang to get in the HOF says it all. Top 3? Okay I can swallow that, but f***in top 10? TOP TEN? I mean what a f***in joke.
I get what you are saying....but....list out all the current Dmen in the HOF and show their Norris finishes....Letang's 8x in top 10 will be better than quite a few.

Quick comparison of Letang vs. the Dmen that got in over the past 10 years (ONLY on top 10 Norris voting finishes):

  • Letang - 3,4,6,6,7,8,9,9 (8x top 10)
  • Weber - 2,2,3,4,4,6,7,8,10 (9x top 10)
  • Wilson - 1,3,4,4 (4x top 10)
  • Lowe - 5,7,8,10 (4x top 10)
  • Zubov - 3,4,8,8,9,9,9 (7x top 10)
  • Pronger - no need to list
  • Lidstrom - no need to list
  • Housley - 3,5,5,5,9,10 (6x top 10)
  • Blake - 1,3,3,4,5,8 (6x top 10)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm

bambamcam4ever

107 and counting
Feb 16, 2012
14,968
7,061
Facts, I mean among the big sports, the hockey hall of fame has the lowest bar. It's like, did you participate? Get the f*** in here!
It has tighter standards than basketball and probably football as well. Dwight Freeney and Devin Hester were inducted this past year lol.
 

BlueAzN

Registered User
Jan 3, 2009
945
355
In South Carolina
I get what you are saying....but....list out all the current Dmen in the HOF and show their Norris finishes....Letang's 8x in top 10 will be better than quite a few.

Quick comparison of Letang vs. the Dmen that got in over the past 10 years (ONLY on top 10 Norris voting finishes):

  • Letang - 3,4,6,6,7,8,9,9 (8x top 10)
  • Weber - 2,2,3,4,4,6,7,8,10 (9x top 10)
  • Wilson - 1,3,4,4 (4x top 10)
  • Lowe - 5,7,8,10 (4x top 10)
  • Zubov - 3,4,8,8,9,9,9 (7x top 10)
  • Pronger - no need to list
  • Lidstrom - no need to list
  • Housley - 3,5,5,5,9,10 (6x top 10)
  • Blake - 1,3,3,4,5,8 (6x top 10)

I’m not gonna say anything but to applaud you on this post just for making the effort to look all this shit up. Well done ser, you’ve earned my respect.

It has tighter standards than basketball and probably football as well. Dwight Freeney and Devin Hester were inducted this past year lol.
The NFL Hall of Fame is the most respected of them all. Give me what you’re smoking
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,419
15,530
For what it's worth - excluding active players, going back to the creation of the Norris trophy (1954), there have been 11 defensemen who have been in the top five in voting two times. Three are in the Hall of Fame, eight of them aren't.

Let's exclude the players who actually won a Norris (since Letang didn't do that). We're left with 10 defensemen - two are in the Hall, eight aren't.

Let's back out the player who never won a Stanley Cup (since the Hall cares a lot about championships). We're left with seven defensemen - two are in the Hall, five aren't.

This is probably the closest match to Letang's profile (two years in the top five, zero Norris trophies, at least one Stanley Cup). He could go to the Hall (like Sergei Zubov and Allan Stanley). Or he might not be inducted (like Dan Boyle, Vladimir Konstantinov, Elmer Vasko, Bob Goldham, and Eric Desjardins). Based on this, it looks like it would be an uphill battle, but not impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
77,985
49,204
He was always injured, he never played enough games to win a Norris.

And while Burns, Subban, and Giordano were weak competition, he was also competing against guys like Karlsson, Doughty, Keith, and Hedman, who are just as good as the top defenseman from any era.
Subban was a superb defenseman. Every bit as good as any of his contemporaries. Just couldn’t stay healthy.
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,261
7,863
S. Pasadena, CA
The Pens almost never retire numbers. They have only done it 3 times in franchise history.
As it should be.
Agreed, but it is worth pointing out that basically everyone who had a case for getting their number retired either played more games elsewhere (namely Francis) or wasn't around long enough to necessarily warrant it (i.e. Coffey's less than 5 full seasons). Everyone else (i.e. Barrasso) is a fringe case who didn't have long-lasting success or is still active.

Those reasons to not retire a number don't fit for Letang, though, so I think there's a good debate to be had on it. Different teams have different standards, but I really do think the Penguins being so stingy has as much to do with the Coffeys and Francises of franchise history not spending 'enough' time in Pittsburgh as it did with them actually being so stingy. The only players to play more games for this franchise are Sid & Geno. Mario & Jagr were passed a while ago. The Penguins not having anyone hitting the 800 GP mark until after Mario's number was retired definitely helped keep those rafters empty for as long as it did...though Kehoe & Pronovost would absolutely have gotten their numbers retired on just about any other expansion team of that era.

We'll have to see how new ownership treats these. We know Lemieux was on the more conservative side with number retirements (though one of his first acts as an owner was to officially retire a number that had been unofficially retired for 30 years), but we really don't know with Fenway. It's not like Jagr's number being retired reset the standard for the Pens or anything - as long as relations could be smoothed over it needed to happen.

I just can't believe Letang actually remained relatively healthy enough to play enough games to get into this kind of discussion. If anyone seemed destined to be completely broken by the age of 30, it was Letang.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad