Randall Graves*
Guest
I've seen this posted here a few times, i've even seen it in ESPN magazine that he may be the most talented of the Staals. Is it true? or is it just your typical overhype in progress?
I've seen this posted here a few times, i've even seen it in ESPN magazine. Is it true? or is it just your typical overhype in progress?
This is correct. This keeps being brought up, but it was always Jordan not Jared.Not even remotely true.
I'm pretty sure that Jordan was the subject of that rumor; I think the father said a while back that Jordan had more potential than Marc or Eric.
NOT Jared. Jared Staal is not in the same league as a prospect.
I guess I got them mixed up but I could've sworn in the espn article I read and I'm paraphrasing it said 'and the youngest, Jared may be the most talented' or some crap like that.Not even remotely true.
I'm pretty sure that Jordan was the subject of that rumor; I think the father said a while back that Jordan had more potential than Marc or Eric.
NOT Jared. Jared Staal is not in the same league as a prospect.
I guess I got them mixed up but I could've sworn in the espn article I read and I'm paraphrasing it said 'and the youngest, Jared may be the most talented' or some crap like that.
Is Jordan the most talented then?
i saw it in another interview as well... they basically gave credit to their 2 on 2 games... the oldest and youngest against the middle 2... him being the youngest he had to work harder to competeI also remember both Eric and Jordan claiming Jared was going to be the best during an interview during the NHL Awards show on OLN at the end of last season.
Of course, that's not to say that he might not ultimately emerge as a similar-calibre prospect. If the Staals are notorious for anything, it seems to be an ability to step up unexpectedly, to take sudden developmental upswings when presented with new challenges. If Jared has some of those genes lurking and ready to show up in his early OHL career, then who knows, maybe what started as fluff stories or misquotes with no basis in hockey reality might actually turn out to be true. But the general consensus I hear is that he's more likely to be an average OHL player with little or no hope of playing in the NHL. Again, who knows, *if* he can manage to hold his head above water in the OHL after a couple of years he'll probably get drafted in the NHL too, on the name basis as a late round flyer, even if people still aren't seeing him as a legitimate prospect. But that's a pretty far cry from the level of prospect his brothers were at.
From what I understand, the youngest Stall kid is light-years behind his older brothers.
But my impression from those who claim to follow such things was that even such a quote from THN was most likely intended basically as just a cute turn of phrase to end the story on, not actually as a meaningful insight on his actual playing ability at the time. It's like "who knows, maybe the person to break Wayne Gretzky's records will be his son Ty!" -- it could sound good in the right context at the right moment of time (some years ago), because hey, really, who does know, -- but it's not seriously meant to imply that the writer has studied Ty Gretzky and thought he was a hockey phenom legitimately capable of breaking his father's records. It just sounds good.i'm unable to locate my copy of the 2003 draft preview from THN, but in that there is an article on the staal brothers. with eric projected to go as the top pick it was one of the first articles to bring attention to all 4 brothers...
i have to find the issue to get the exact quote but i'm 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999% sure that in that article it says that the youngest jared "might" be the most talented of all...
THAT is where this rumor came from. THN might have gotten it wrong, but thats were everyone got jared from...but lets also keep in mind that in june 2003, jared was only 12 years old. thinking that he had the most potential when he was 12 vs the others at 12, doesn't mean he'll have more potential when he turns 18.
But my impression from those who claim to follow such things was that even such a quote from THN was most likely intended basically as just a cute turn of phrase to end the story on, not actually as a meaningful insight on his actual playing ability at the time. It's like "who knows, maybe the person to break Wayne Gretzky's records will be his son Ty!" -- it could sound good in the right context at the right moment of time (some years ago), because hey, really, who does know, -- but it's not seriously meant to imply that the writer has studied Ty Gretzky and thought he was a hockey phenom legitimately capable of breaking his father's records. It just sounds good.
But my impression from those who claim to follow such things was that even such a quote from THN was most likely intended basically as just a cute turn of phrase to end the story on, not actually as a meaningful insight on his actual playing ability at the time. It's like "who knows, maybe the person to break Wayne Gretzky's records will be his son Ty!" -- it could sound good in the right context at the right moment of time (some years ago), because hey, really, who does know, -- but it's not seriously meant to imply that the writer has studied Ty Gretzky and thought he was a hockey phenom legitimately capable of breaking his father's records. It just sounds good.
If i had a dollar for every player that scouts and fans said "_____ have the most potential" i'd be a rich man.
Until Jared is drafted and plays a couple of seasons, you can't determine if he actually shows potential. Right now, he's just a kid having fun in a league and getting points...