socko
Registered User
Larkin and Hyman were a great fit in college. It would get Hyman off of Matthews and Tavares lines where he does more harm than good and create a new shutdown line. Kadri would have to move to the wing.
Yes you clearly do. You dislike Dubas and it tells you something you like to hear. No one but Kypreos has claimed this.
There are also benefits to being the primary offensive option like he is compared to having 3 offensive lines and seeing 2nd PP usage.ask yourself this: who does Larkin play with? Now imagine him on Mathews wing..........nuff said.
There are also benefits to being the primary offensive option like he is compared to having 3 offensive lines and seeing 2nd PP usage.
It's awesome to play with a guy like Matthews. It's also great to get the puck in every scoring opportunity. Larkin gets one of those, Nylander gets the other. Neither gets both.
Basically,I trust Shanny. Shanny likes what Dubas brings to the table. He won in the Sault,he won with the Marlies. He is a new breed so to speak,so for sure the jury is still out on him. McBackup was my preference as well,but only for this year,so I get where Dubas may be thinking long term on the goalie front. Sparky has been better than I thought he would...wouldn't you agree? Willy,well again,not being privy to the pertinent details,is really difficult for me to blame Dubas. I lean towards the greed factor of the Willy camp. In the end,he is signed,he is here and will be for quite a few years,hopefully producing better than he is presently. Leivo...could of just been doing Josh a favor,Babs had no plans for Josh. You are right to question him,I do as well,but some of the decisions that need to be made will always bring debate.I had my concerns with him being so green. But I wouldn't say I have a bias towards disliking him. Don't like what he did with our backup situation....the willy hing....trading Leivo for a water bottle.....his actions have made me question him.
Explain your different view then. I don't see how anyone can spin that situation as good.
So all GMs have failed is what you are saying? Because no RFA is signing.
Maybe if Lou didnt fight these guys over their signing bonuses, they'd be more inclined to have an easy negotiation with the team now. No doubt about it, Lou set a negative tone with these guys and the Leafs will have to pay for it.
So if he deserves zero credit, what GMs deserve credit for UFA signings? Because he had to do a hell of a lot more work. Sounds like he filmed a god damn Hollywood commercial.
Marleau and Zaitsev were team friendly deals? Also the Isles are tied with the Leafs for the first time this season and you bring up the standings. Did you think the same when the Leafs were ahead?Lou had no problem signing our guys to team friendly deals. He's also a Stanley Cup winner and a first place GM right now. After tonight there's a good chance were a wild card team. Ouch.
Marleau and Zaitsev were team friendly deals? Also the Isles are tied with the Leafs for the first time this season and you bring up the standings. Did you think the same when the Leafs were ahead?
Nylander deserved more than Larkin.
Should he have though? It's nice the Islanders are doing well, do we think that's a team built for a cup or long term success?Isles were expected to be a bottom feeder. Lou didn't let that happen. Brought in a goalie and some real hard working pros.
Should he have though? It's nice the Islanders are doing well, do we think that's a team built for a cup or long term success?
We got a stats geek technocrat as a GM, thank goodness!We hired hockey's version of Theo Epstein. Don't worry.
The caveat to Nylander's camp getting such a great deal was that at least it was tradeable given the structure. Our inability to take advantage of the cap savings with the late holdout, while hurting our bottomline, also meant a lot of salary is already paid come July 1st next year. We failed to capture the salary cap savings, but at least a prospective suitor would now that the Leafs had paid a ton up front, real dollars very attractive. However, one starts to now wonder if this contract is attractive? I'm actually envisioning a Kessel scenario where we would have to retain some salary to get a decent return. Who the hell gives real quality back for this "elite" talent at this long term cap hit? Deal looks worse and worse each day imo.
Dubas gave him what he was worth. Why are people still disputing this?If your GM creates a contract that makes trading it in the future an advantage to the organization making it a positive behind the signing, but then promises he doesn't plan on trading him essentially giving the player a verbal NTC, then that simply overlaps and then defeats the first part.
If Willy's goal was not to be traded and wanted to stay a Leaf long-term than it was in his interest to have a contract that makes it more difficult and less appetizing to deal. That is leverage for the GM to use in his contract position.. However not only did Willy get Dubas to agree to massive frontloaded/ bonus laden deal, he then got him to admit publicly he wouldn't trade him. Then it took to the 11th hour on the last day to even get this lopsided contract in Nylander's advantage competed.
Its things exactly like that, that do make one question the negotiating abilities and strategies of the GM and rightfully so. Not going to find many hockey knowledgeable people that believe Dubas didn't get schooled hard in this deal by a clever player agent to believe suddenly that things are going to be different with Auston and Mitch coming up.
In fact Dubas caving to Nylander has now set a bad precedence that when push comes to shove he will do the same for AM and MM and both their agents know that.
Take a break Michael, enjoy the evening.Dubas gave him what he was worth. Why are people still disputing this?
Should he have though? It's nice the Islanders are doing well, do we think that's a team built for a cup or long term success?