Did Gaborik have HOF talent?

Nathaniel Skywalker

Registered User
Oct 18, 2013
14,135
5,767
One of my favourite players growing up. Speed was insane and was a great goal scorer. Played on some really defensive teams in his early prime. Too bad for all the injuries. But if healthy 40 goals or close was a shoe in and in a lower scoring era.
 

Kane One

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
43,731
11,590
Brooklyn, New NY
Absolutely. I don’t see how that would be up for debate. He was made of glass though.

no.

Here is some of my criteria

1) 50 goal seasons? No
2) 100 pts seasons? Non
3) 500 goals/1000pts? No
4) Any hardware? No

While he won the cup with LA--he was brought in at the 11th hour to join the team.

For me he is the hall of very good.
OP was not asking if he should be in the HHOF. The question is about his talent, not his career.
 

sr edler

gold is not reality
Mar 20, 2010
12,080
6,550
He did have a pretty limited skill-set overall IMO. Yes, speedy as hell and could snipe with the best, but I feel he was what a lot of people who never saw Bure play would caricature him as.
 

Felidae

Registered User
Sep 30, 2016
11,718
14,666
In his best season, he peaked at 10th in points and 5th in goals as a 27 year old.

He only has a single top 10 point finish and 3 top goal finishes (3, 5, 7)

He was never really a true contender for any major awards. Even his 3rd place goalscoring finish, he is 9 goals behind Malkin and 19 behind Stamkos.

You could argue a healthy Gaborik has more top 10 goal finishes, and maybe point finishes. But at best that makes him a very borderline case. I think realistically he would just be in a higher tier of "hall of very good" players.

Players like Theo Fleury, Zigmund Palffy, Markus Naslund, John Leclair all have better top 10 stat finishes, and none of them are in the HHOF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: North Man

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad