Toggle sidebar

Did Canada lose deliberately in World Championship 1987?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pekkafromswe said:
I don't think this has been confirmed.
Click to expand...
Maybe not but the comments from the coach and the performance seem to lend a lot of credibility to it.

I guess we can never say for sure I suppose. But it sure is fishy, personally i am convinced they did it, but thats just me.
 
NyQuil said:
It wasn’t like Sweden losing on purpose in 2006 so they could play Switzerland.
Click to expand...
Also 2011. Sweden plays Canada in the final group game. Late in the 3rd everyone knows that the winner gets Russia, loser gets Germany. Trailing by one with five minutes left, Sweden gets a power play. Then they proceed to take two penalties, leaving them shorthanded for the rest of the game. But karma caught up to them in the 3rd period of the final against Finland.
 
The better question is who came up with that terribly flawed system where this situation is even possible?
 
Well yes, Russia is the best. But I bet you Canadians think otherwise because the tournament wasn't "Best on Best hockey" wahh wahh.
Every nation sent the best players available.
 
StepDownKennyH said:
Well yes, Russia is the best. But I bet you Canadians think otherwise because the tournament wasn't "Best on Best hockey" wahh wahh.

Every nation sent the best players available.
Click to expand...

Saying it over and over again isn't going to convince us.

We're pretty consistent in our outlook. It's not like we're picking and choosing here.

Sweden was the best in 2006, just like the Czechs were in 2002.

But congratulations to Sweden nonetheless. The WHC is a fun tournament, one that I watch every year.

But I also wasn't claiming Canada was the best on the basis on their back to back WHC gold medals a few years ago.

Just accept it and enjoy.
 
NyQuil said:
Saying it over and over again isn't going to convince us.

We're pretty consistent in our outlook. It's not like we're picking and choosing here.

Sweden was the best in 2006, just like the Czechs were in 2002.

But congratulations to Sweden nonetheless. The WHC is a fun tournament, one that I watch every year.

But I also wasn't claiming Canada was the best on the basis on their back to back WHC gold medals a few years ago.

Just accept it and enjoy.
Click to expand...

You obviously aren't aware that the Olympic tournament automatically produces the "best" because of never explained reasons. Except in the sports where it doesn't. Ignorant.
 
Pekkafromswe said:
I don't think this has been confirmed.
Click to expand...

Confirmed and confirmed, but take it from the horse's own mouth, folks:

"Forsberg: Slovakia was an deliberately lost game".

I even remember the Swedish commentators goin' real berzerk (me thinx it was Wikegård!?) over Tre Kronor chicken-play in that game.

Finland met all the top dogs in that tournament - Sweden did not.

Sweden maybe won - but Finland was the best team back in Italy 2006.

Forsberg: Slovakien var en läggmatch
 
Razamanaz said:
Confirmed and confirmed, but take it from the horse's own mouth, folks:

"Forsberg: Slovakia was an deliberately lost game".

I even remember the Swedish commentators goin' real berzerk (me thinx it was Wikegård!?) over Tre Kronor chicken-play in that game.

Finland met all the top dogs in that tournament - Sweden did not.

Sweden maybe won - but Finland was the best team back in Italy 2006.

Forsberg: Slovakien var en läggmatch
Click to expand...

sweden dominated finland in the final, thats a fact.

go to sleep.
 
Luck?

An even with more luck than Alexander Lukas of Disney-fame ever had!

He (Alexander Lukas) may be a duck ... but Sweden are chickens.

Where were you in the Second World War Sweden?
 
Razamanaz said:
Confirmed and confirmed, but take it from the horse's own mouth, folks:

"Forsberg: Slovakia was an deliberately lost game".

I even remember the Swedish commentators goin' real berzerk (me thinx it was Wikegård!?) over Tre Kronor chicken-play in that game.

Finland met all the top dogs in that tournament - Sweden did not.

Sweden maybe won - but Finland was the best team back in Italy 2006.

Forsberg: Slovakien var en läggmatch
Click to expand...

Did you read the full articel you i guess not because you are just a salty cry baby...

Vi kanske diskuterade inom gruppen att det nog "är bättre om vi inte går ut och tar ut oss allt för mycket."

And that's not what you claming it to be the topic there was just clickbait... they dident lose on purpose but they dident do everything to win it either because they dident have to.

And no Finland isnt better than Sweden and never will be you are and will remain in the Shadows of your superior big brother in the west.
 
...
lukasalexanderz.jpg
 
Razamanaz said:
Luck?

An even with more luck than Alexander Lukas of Disney-fame ever had!

He (Alexander Lukas) may be a duck ... but Sweden are chickens.

Where were you in the Second World War Sweden?
Click to expand...

Helping Finland were was we were with Supplies and manpower questions?

Where were Finland during the thirty years war oh yeah thats right you dident exist as a nation:sarcasm:
 
Last edited:
The only time you were big Sweden in history - then you had Finland on your side.

Fighting your war.

The Thirty Year' War.

Hakkapeliitta is not just an excellent winter-tire for cars - that was also the name of the Finland light cavalry who always stod on the frontline when Sweden conquered Europe.
So don't even for a moment think you Swedes did it all on your own!

The way you (Sweden) thanked Finland for that - was to let 'em (Finland) face Soviet Russia all on their own.

Thanx for nothin' Sweden.

Remember: You could've been neighbours next to Russia instead of Finland, Sweden ...
 
Razamanaz said:
The only time you were big Sweden in history - then you had Finland on your side.

Fighting your war.

The Thirty Year' War.

Hakkapeliitta is not just an excellent winter-tire for cars - that was also the name of the Finland light cavalry who always stod on the frontline when Sweden conquered Europe.
So don't even for a moment think you Swedes did it all on your own!

The way you (Sweden) thanked Finland for that - was to let 'em (Finland) face Soviet Russia all on their own.

Thanx for nothin' Sweden.

Remember: You could've been neighbours next to Russia instead of Finland, Sweden ...
Click to expand...

Wow You guys acctually beliving the myth about yourself :laugh: No Hakkapeliitta wasent only finnish and they dident play a major roll in the battles like our mobile artillery... second of all Finland dident exist back then you dident exist in history until 1917.

Finnish Homophobic Slurs dident fight our war in the Thirty Year war it was a good ammount of Swedes little bit of fins and rest were German and Scots mercenaries.

Let Finland Face Soviet all on their own? you are literally an idiot with inferior complex Foreign support of Finland in the Winter War - Wikipedia

wow wasting my time on a brainlet like you that knows little to zero about history.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom