After we spent forever agonizing over Sanderson vs Drysdale (for no reason), the Ducks went into the 2020 draft planning to take either of them if one was left at #6.Regarding the first part, so are you saying that if Capitals were given a possibility to draft Ovechkin's literal clone, they should say "no, thanks" because they already have one Ovechkin in this spot? Nashville literally drafted Seth Jones into the logjam of D and fixed that by trading him for perceived young #1C Ryan Johansen. They had an enormous need for a center but still, they ignored their need because they believed Jones is a better prospect than Monahan or Lindholm.
Regarding the second part, this is like, all your opinion. If you believe that multiple prospects are equal, then of course, "a need" is the only thing separating them but:
1) I don't think that many people believe that Slafkovsky/Jiricek/Nemec/Cooley are equal (before even adding Savoie, Nazar to this crop). Judging by what people write here, most people prefer player X over player Y.
2) If you spend thousands or millions of US$ to run your scouting department, them coming back saying that "You know what, boss, Jiricek, Nazar, Cooley, Nemec, Slafkovsky are all entirely equal, pick up whoever fits the need." is absurd. IMO, "equal" prospects exist only in rationales of people who want to push the "team need" narrative. And that's fine, this narrative is fine for mock drafts (otherwise those would be rankings with players assigned to teams) and building a team on the forum, however in the real life, BPA works better because if you maximize value via draft, you can fix the team needs by trading value from the area of strength to the area of relative weakness.
I did say I was punchy.Is that the longest post you’ve made without the use of florid profanity?
Plus if Slaf is gone they both need a center more than we do, so we can get whatever additions to their pick AND get Nemec or Jiricek. You run the risk of Wright being a superstar but I don't think he'll be that anyway."Tough spot" is right.
'Cause then it would be :
1.) Do we take Shane?
2.) Do we draft Nemec?
3.) Do we draft Jiricek?
4.) Do we trade the pick?
I have a feeling Fitz would rather choose a D-man if Slaf wasn't available, then draft another Center.
That's my thought, too.
I think both teams' GM's would salivate at the opportunity to somehow draft Shane Wright if MTL galaxy-brains their pick.
The one issue I have with draft another Dman is we don't have much PP opportunity to provide. Ideally you only want 1D on each unit and that is likely going to be Dougie and Luke once he arrives. You potentially go with 2D on the second unit if you have to but its usually more effective to have 1D.I must attest though to the idea of a top-pair RD coming up as Hamilton ages and playing possibly with Luke Hughes on what could be a top pair in the league...
Its very, very convincing and the depth at RD would certainly help us considering the lack of prospects in that department. Though technically Luke could play the right and maybe one of our LD blossoms into a top-4 role?
Still though, a top pair RD is probably the more valuable asset and much harder to find than a winger. Then again we may already have a solid enough foundation with Luke/Siegenthaler and Hamilton/Severson. And with rumors of Severson wanting to re-sign I wouldnt blame Fitzgerald for getting antsy and leaning toward a more 'needed' player in Slafkovsky, then take some shots over rest of this and the next few drafts at RD.
Defense twice in back to back drafts top-4 would be bold and Id respect the attention to detail for the future core. Because in theory having two 1st overall centers should lower the amount of or level of draft capital you have to dedicate to their wings.
f*** those FloridiansIs that the longest post you’ve made without the use of florid profanity?
Kevin Fiala is 25th in the league over the last 3 years in terms of goals scored in the NHL. 32nd in points.Slaf is my preference and anyone who thinks we should trade a 2OA for Kevin f***ing Fiala shouldnt watch hockey ever again
Is the 9-game route your thought on how many games it takes to decide if he's good enough?As long as he gets his 9(?) game stint from opening night, Im okay with the AHL route.
My main gripe was him not getting any games out of camp. For his size and apparent acumen Id be slightly disappointed by that (and more disappointed by a Liiga return, which as you state doesnt help his NA game)
If we draft him id like his ELC signed as soon as possible.
If the D options at 2nd OA are strong defensively I don't worry about PP oppurtunities. And if the BPA at our pick is a RD then picking a RD is an easy call.The one issue I have with draft another Dman is we don't have much PP opportunity to provide. Ideally you only want 1D on each unit and that is likely going to be Dougie and Luke once he arrives. You potentially go with 2D on the second unit if you have to but its usually more effective to have 1D.
Regardless, if one of the D are the BPA, you should probably still draft them and try to figure it out.
I'm not sure you can really go wrong at 2nd overall, but the more I read and watch about Slafkovsky, the more I like the idea of having a big top-6 winger that's more Joe Thornton than Milan Lucic. A I don't really care if he crashes and bangs and works the boards. If he has good hands and a good playmaking IQ, he could be invaluable in the Devils' top-6 for a long time.
Jiricek would end up like Josi and Slaf could be Zacha too though, the draft is a crap shoot unless they're "generational" like McDavid, Matthews, presumably Bedard, etcI think jiricek is more likely to become a top pair franchise defenseman than slafkovsky becoming a top pair franchise winger. But what do I know... jiricek could end up like adam Larsson and slafkovsky could be mikko rantanen
Couturier made a fast impact? I seem to remember him being more of a late bloomer.All fans project things onto future draft picks that don’t hold water but we’ve reached fan fic levels on Slaf. I don’t see anything too extraordinary from any of the guys we’re discussing, especially IQ wise. Compare these guys to a young Couturier or Doughty. Do you think any of them think the game as well as those guys did? Because that’s the kind of player that makes an impact fast - and it’s not any of this crew. Thrilled to draft any of them but there are some serious visualization exercises going on here.
All fans project things onto future draft picks that don’t hold water but we’ve reached fan fic levels on Slaf. I don’t see anything too extraordinary from any of the guys we’re discussing, especially IQ wise. Compare these guys to a young Couturier or Doughty. Do you think any of them think the game as well as those guys did? Because that’s the kind of player that makes an impact fast - and it’s not any of this crew. Thrilled to draft any of them but there are some serious visualization exercises going on here.
Ya Couturier was a late birthday from the previous draft year that stepped into the league as an 18-19 year old but didn’t actually have much of an impact at least from a production standpoint for a while. Didn’t even have a season over 0.5ppg until his 5th season when he was 22-23 and then didn’t really breakout as a big producer until his 7th season when he was 24-25. Certainly wasn’t an instant impact.Couturier made a fast impact? I seem to remember him being more of a late bloomer.
You’re thinking offensively. I’m talking about 200 ft game - he belonged instantly. Offense came later.Ya Couturier was a late birthday from the previous draft year that stepped into the league as an 18-19 year old but didn’t actually have much of an impact at least from a production standpoint for a while. Didn’t even have a season over 0.5ppg until his 5th season when he was 22-23 and then didn’t really breakout as a big producer until his 7th season when he was 24-25. Certainly wasn’t an instant impact.
Couturier was also an 8th overall pick so I don’t know why you’re acting like Couturier was much better at the same age. Slafkovsky thinks the game well IMO. I don’t think he’s definitely ready next season but it wouldn’t surprise me if he was and it wouldn’t surprise me if he had a better impact than Couturier’s 27 point rookie season.
Doughty on the other hand was a second overall pick who had an instant impact. Not fair to expect that from our second pick.
Ya I added that in but it is not some dreamland, fan fic idea to think that Slafkovsky could come in and be able to play at the NHL level right away.You’re thinking offensively. I’m talking about 200 ft game - he belonged instantly. Offense came later.
Broader point is I think most, if not all these guys go the Holtz, not Mercer, path.
As a goalie myself I can tell you success at the position is about 60% in your head. You've got to learn a huge amount of poise and focus, and learn to never get rattled. Not attributes teens are usually known for. The minute you start second-guessing yourself your game will go all to hell - doesn't matter how talented you are.Yeah which is even more crazy when you think about it. Legit one job for a goalie from day 1 of playing the game. One job in a 1-0 or 5-0 game and that’s to stop the puck. Why can an 18 year old play in the physical Nhl with grown men but goalies can’t figure it out?
Ya I added that in but it is not some dreamland, fan fic idea to think that Slafkovsky could come in and be able to play at the NHL level right away.
I think most of them do too. But I think there’s a 95% chance Shane Wright plays next year and does fine and I think Slafkovsky could do well enough and make it out of camp and then stick. He has the tools and IMO thinks the game well. I’m not saying he will but it’s not unrealistic to thinks it reasonably possible.
First I’d much rather him come over right away to the AHL. Let’s him acclimated to NA, familiarize himself with the organization and then he can get a shot in the big leagues if earns it.He’ll be 18 years old, it’s pretty unrealistic.
Rantanen, if we’re using him as a comparison, had an October birthday so he got to play another season in Liiga before his draft year.
Ratanen then came over at 19 in 2015-16 (his D+1 year but the equivalent of Slaf’s D+2 year) and played 9 games in the NHL and had zero points. He scored 60 points, with 24 goals, in 54 AHL regular season games.
In 2016-17, at 20, he played 4 AHL games and had 2 assists. He played 78 NHL regular season games and had 38 points with 20 goals.
He had 84 points, with 29 goals, in 81 regular season games in 2017-18 at 21. He played in 6 playoff games and 4 assists.
They aren’t the same player but I doubt Slafkovsky matures faster than Ratanen and bigger players don’t traditionally make it that quickly. Considering that the team has discussed not rushing guys, I doubt he plays in the NHL that quickly.
Another question is if he even comes over to the AHL or stays in Liiga for another season.