lachyrm
Registered User
- Jun 3, 2010
- 217
- 1
Again, don't you have to first determine that scoring remained flat from regular to postseason in the era you're determining that scoring the same in regular and postseason isn't a better performance?
If most players score significantly less (or significantly more, even) in the postseason, and a player maintains their scoring pace, that's a plus for the one who maintained his pace.
Simply saying the scoring pace was flat from regular and postseason is meaningless.
If most players score significantly less (or significantly more, even) in the postseason, and a player maintains their scoring pace, that's a plus for the one who maintained his pace.
Simply saying the scoring pace was flat from regular and postseason is meaningless.