Agreed. Thinks thats the idea here.That’s fine if he’s the 6/7 defenseman to let the young guys get minutes into the minors.
Think you can write off a Subban return for good now.
I think Subban is looking to either get a higher $ figure or multi-year deal, if not, think he tries to latch on to chase a Cup (could see TB maybe as #6 D if Ruuta goes elsewhere).That’s what I was thinking. But honestly, I would have been okay if Subban took this contract instead. Ohh well.
i think Subban is gonna take a smaller deal to a bigger market, can def see him going to LA or back to a canadian team.I think Subban is looking to either get a higher $ figure or multi-year deal, if not, think he tries to latch on to chase a Cup (could see TB maybe as #6 D if Ruuta goes elsewhere).
Ty Smith can pack his bags at this point.
Could be worse, Canucks just gave Lazar a 3 year deal........Depth move, seems like a competent defenseman. Totally fine with this, but confused why it needed to be a 2 year deal.
He probably wouldnt sign a one year deal and they're ok with the second year?Depth move, seems like a competent defenseman. Totally fine with this, but confused why it needed to be a 2 year deal.