Camille the Eel
Registered User
I disagree we overpaid for Markstrom. Bahl has done shit this year and our D was strong. The 2025 pick hasn’t been made yet and it isn’t a high one. We needed to stabilize the goalie position and we did. I don’t consider we gave up much to fix the biggest problem we had for several preceding years. Markstrom may have won like the 2d most games of any goalie in the league, despite missing some time after a Boston guy crunched him. The price we paid in this trade was not high, nor was it a factor in how we played this year. Give us Bahl and the pick back and we aren’t any better in 2024-25 and take away Markstrom and we are a lot worse.Yea I mean no one really argued Markstrom wasn't gonna be an upgrade this year. The argument was it was an overpay that should only be made by a team set to seriously contend immediately considering his age/asset value sent. The issue of course is this roster was never going to seriously contend this season, even with Jack. If you make the Markstrom move, you need to be prepared to throw your chips in the middle for a high-end 3C at a minimum before the season starts as well. No half measures. If you can't materially improved the C depth because of silly contracts or whatever reason(s), then you don't overpay for a 35 year old goalie.
A mid 1st and cost controlled giant #4 dman still not in his prime was a general overpay given the goalie market values. Then consider the actual situation for the Devs and it really didn't make sense. Devs got near realistic best case performance out of Markstrom for most of the season....and it still didn't matter. If he was 28, this would be fine. But he wasn't/isn't.