Devils fans throw beer on ice, Leafs bench. Cause delay of game.

[HockeyVirus]

Absolutely classless

Click to read more...

 

[NDiesel]

Honestly can't blame them those were some tacky ass calls except for the 2nd

Context for anyone: 3 disallowed goals for the Devs

Edit: Didn't realize the 3rd was a kick in, thought it was called GI

 

[LeafsNation149]

Devils fans just discovered you can't kick a puck into the net.

 

[BertCorbeau]

I mean 3 goals called back ... I get it

 

[Paulie Walnutz]

Is anybody surprised? They had to change the goal song because they would chant hey you suck and people complained

 

[koyvoo]

 

[LastOne2100]

Bruins fan here...honestly can't blame them those were some tacky ass calls except for the 2nd

Context for anyone: 3 disallowed goals for the Devs

The third was textbook kicking motion. Anyone who has ever read the rule knows it's obviously no goal. First two you can argue about.

Honestly, probably would've happened in most arenas with 3 disallowed goals. Pretty wild.

 

[Three On Zero]

They just witnessed 3 goals being called back, makes sense why they are a little pissy tonight

 

[HockeyVirus]

Bruins fan here...honestly can't blame them those were some tacky ass calls except for the 2nd

Context for anyone: 3 disallowed goals for the Devs

I mean two goalie interference and a kick.

 

[mcleex]

We're getting the Boston Bruin favorable calls for once! Feels good man

 

[tmlmatus]

I mean 3 goals called back ... I get it

I mean, 2 of them were obvious no goals per the rules. First one could of went either way.

 

[GIN ANTONIC]

I absolutely loathe the Leafs but honestly all those no goal calls were legit. It sucks but the rules are the rules

 

[Community]

I understand being frustrated at 3 goals called back and it's hard to have a great view live/in arena, but the 2nd and 3rd were textbook no-goals. First one was 50/50 and understandable to be upset over.

 

[NDiesel]

I

The third was textbook kicking motion. Anyone who has ever read the rule knows it's obviously no goal.

First two you can argue about.

Honestly, probably would've happened in most arenas with 3 disallowed goals.

My bad, must have missed the replay on the 3rd...I have it on in the background with no sound so I assumed it was interference.

The 2nd one I get why they'd call it off even though contact looked incidental

 

[Csonked Out]

There isn't a fan base alive that wouldn't lose it on home ice with 3 disallowed goals in one game.

 

[A1LeafNation]

Terrible

 

[DickSmehlik]

When all of the judgement calls go against you, I totally get it.

While 1 definitely should not have counted, the other 2 were borderline that could have gone either way.

 

[TMLeafer]

Maybe they threw the rulebook onto the ice too.

 

[pcruz]

I mean 3 goals called back ... I get it

I mean, if you pick up the puck and throw it into the other net 50 times, you can't argue that after 49 goals called back, that you should get one of them allowed.

All 3 were clear no goal situations.

 

[Orfieus]

The third was textbook kicking motion. Anyone who has ever read the rule knows it's obviously no goal. First two you can argue about.

Honestly, probably would've happened in most arenas with 3 disallowed goals. Pretty wild.

We're getting the Boston Bruin favorable calls for once! Feels good man

I might be a biased Leaf fan but you can't knock the goalie down behind the net. The only real questionable call would have been the first but the NJ player did interfere

 

[tabness]

These fans should look at the example of Leafs fans not throwing garbage on the ice despite the garbage they gotta watch every game

 

[Ace]

if they hit these crooked officials it’s warranted

 

[Based Anime Fan]

I mean, if you pick up the puck and throw it into the other net 50 times, you can't argue that after 49 goals called back, that you should get one of them allowed.

All 3 were clear no goal situations.

They were for fans watching on TV who can see and hear reviews and explanations.

 

[Community]

I

My bad, must have missed the replay on the 3rd...I have it on in the background with no sound so I assumed it was interference.

The 2nd one I get why they'd call it off even though contact looked incidental

Contact probably was incidental... I believe it's supposed to be no goal if incidental, and no goal + penalty if on purpose/egregious (could be wrong though).

 

[LastOne2100]

I might be a biased Leaf fan but you can't knock the goalie down behind the net. The only real questionable call would have been the first but the NJ player did interfere

I think the calls were correct, all I was saying is that you COULD argue them.