Does he really deserve $4M? When you have him, Palat at $6M and Haula at over $3M...there is a cost to those decisions. Could have had a legit top line forward for those dollars instead and still filled the 3rd pair role and 3C role.
I get what your saying but does'nt Nico take the most or the second most faceoffs in the entire league? If it wasn't important why not throw out Haula, Mercer, Dowling or Lazar. These situations are all important till they're not.I still hate zone starts. Nobody starts over 50% of their shifts in the offensive zone, most start on the fly or in the neutral zone.
So there is some difference but people end up thinking it’s huge when it may only work out to 1-2 a game.
16.2% of Nico’s shifts start in the defensive zone while 14.3% start in the offensive zone at 5 on 5. It works out to 1 extra defensive zone start every 3 games.
Still a positive for Nico, this is just a rant about how influential people think zone starts that only look at offensive/defensive starts are.
It’s not important vs not important.I get what your saying but does'nt Nico take the most or the second most faceoffs in the entire league? If it wasn't important why not throw out Haula, Mercer, Dowling or Lazar. These situations are all important till they're not.
Mid-summer 8x8When do we think we see a Luke signing by?
Nico has the toughest assignments regardless of zone starts. Like 95th-percentile + every year. Giving as much as offense has he does given the assignments deserves a lot of credit.
He’s never really had the chance to showcase his playmaking here given he was immediately thrust into the shutdown role. His offensive numbers have come on A LOT in the last 3 years. Near PPG Selke caliber center who is captain everywhere he goes.
If Nico has million fans, then I'm one of them.
If Nico has one fan, then I'm THAT ONE.
If Nico has no fans, that means I'm dead.
I've said it before, given the choice of having Jack or Nico out, I'd rather have Jack out every single time. Nico's responsiblities and his all around game are just too important to how this team plays now. Run and gun, zero defense, 6-5 games, yeah maybe Jack is more important.
That being said, there is no way in hell, in a MILLION f***ING YEARS, that not having Jack Hughes in the lineup is anyway beneficial to this team.
C'mon stop with this nonsense.
They’ve been doing it for at least 2 decades.Man they really love getting more and more detailed in the stats. Now measuring where the shift starts on the ice lol comical
Just wait until you see how much clutching grabbing holding interference cross checks and hits to the back Carolina gets away with. Especially Sasquatch. I probably skate faster than that guy at this point. It will be some of thr worst hockey you have ver seen played. And the Canes will not fight when called out after the cheap shots.
I’m still betting against the team.
In an ideal world you’d have a more capable skater next to Dougie. Wouldn’t have to be a big offensive producer but someone who can cover for the wandering he does.
Man they really love getting more and more detailed in the stats. Now measuring where the shift starts on the ice lol comical
back in my betting days, i would always, always always bet against the devils. ESPECIALLY if they were playing the rangers. win/win babyThey surprised me on Saturday. Can they do it again? I’m still betting against the team.
Man they really love getting more and more detailed in the stats. Now measuring where the shift starts on the ice lol comical
Jack Hughes with Jesper Bratt: 55.2 xGF% (58 GF%)
Jack Hughes without Bratt: 61 xGF% (61 GF%)
Jesper Bratt without Jack: 42.2 xGF% (48 GF%)
View attachment 1002770
back in my betting days, i would always, always always bet against the devils. ESPECIALLY if they were playing the rangers. win/win baby
Wild are kinda butt. They’re injured to hell and back, plus they have the bald man behind the bench.They surprised me on Saturday. Can they do it again? I’m still betting against the team.