I'm not as down as others at the price we paid for Dumo in a sellers market. He has cup pedigree and is way more valuable to a playoff team then the Ducks. That is a buyers move through and through and addressed a need for a LHD. I thought that was a solid move. I also like the Glass move a lot. I'm not going to ignore those two trades because he failed to get the big prize. He won 2 years ago as a buyer in the Meier sweepstakes. He lost this year on his target. The other 2 moves were good ones. I do not believe he hand picked Glass. I think they liked him for a while and was a trade he was gonna make even if the big trade worked out.
The perceived image of a "2nd rd pick" carries a lot more value than the position in the 2nd rd itself... Like offering someone a late 2nd vs an early 3rd, position wise it may be off handful of spots but the value of 2nd rd pick is that its a 2nd rd pick. despite the relativity to one another in the draft.
For me, that value shouldn't be wasted on. Now did we bring a 27 yr old dman? no, 30? no lol.... we brought in a 33 yr old IIRC, pending FA to a team that wasn't a "final piece" away by any imagination... What will Dumo bring/do that we're not getting from our current Defense structure? He's not fast, idk how physical, he seemed ok nothing crazy vs Philly(which is super fine), ironically he was caught off guard on the breakaway goal. Is Dumo carrying a Eric Gelinas like cannon shot? offensive force? So where's the return value?
The championship pedigree, ok, not to be overlooked but that was almost 9 years ago... when he was 24 lol... we have a 'chip pedigree in Palat already. But enough to use our 2nd(via another team)? Nemec aside, the defense and goaltending are not what this team is hurting, its the offense.
Now that doesn't imply I'm saying trade for a regrettable contract just to put a pt producer. But say, Cozens(recency trade target) was approachable by us and the deal just needed one more pick/asset to push the Sabres to say yes, wouldn't we want that 2nd for that? a term offensive guy?
Fitz over the years have brought countless defensemen who are pretty good to be honest, so why throw a high pick away for a position/player of age n term that you(fitz) actually don't have hurdles to improving on via draft, free agency, AHL or trade.
So if the choice, overpay or Dumo or keep the pick, i'd keep the pic.
Disclaimer: perhaps the trade was the first part in order to complete a whole different trade that fell short, so it would be somewhat tied together due to the missing out on whoever.