Devils discussion (news, notes and speculation) - part V

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
IMG_4370.gif
 
I'd take the Pettersson risk, even if he doesn't rebound to what he was before he would still fill a role that the Devils would need to spend for (trade/fa) since they don't have center prospects and so you can take the high cap hit risk with the rising cap and Jack signed at 8m.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guadana
I don’t really have much interest in O’Reilly. He’s old as shit and could just be done offensively. Two more years of that would be killer
 
I'd take the Pettersson risk, even if he doesn't rebound to what he was before he would still a role that the Devils would need to spend for (trade/fa) since they don't have center prospects and so you can take the high cap hit risk with the rising cap and Jack signed at 8m.
I also would take the risk, but its a huge boom bust here
 
Ok, you guys look really silly saying Soucy is trash and cackling at Drury. He was solid the prior 2 seasons and has 1 more year at a reasonable cap. Pretty much every Van players has been awful outside of Quinn. If he doesn't workout, he can be moved easily. Do you think HF has a conspiracy against the Devs? Because most impartial parties on the mainboard say the Soucy trade was fair and the Devs got hosed for Dumo. Can we stop with the mid off between Fitz and Drury?

Now what is kinda weird is the Rags gave up the Sharks' 3rd, so basically a 2nd, no retention. At first I figured the Ducks wanted to retain for cap/contracts, but now I'm not so sure. Did the Devs really add value for that retention?? I'm not writing that off as a possibility now. And if that's the case....Fitz currently targeting EP would make it make sense...for better or for worse. Otherwise there's virtually no chance they need cap flexibility rn. Who knows.
 
Don't get Vancouver's end game, you trade Miller to satisfy Petterson and then trade Petterson? Would be funny as f*** if we land Petterson because Quinn is long gone when UFA time comes up
 
Ok, you guys look really silly saying Soucy is trash and cackling at Drury. He was solid the prior 2 seasons and has 1 more year at a reasonable cap. Pretty much every Van players has been awful outside of Quinn. If he doesn't workout, he can be moved easily. Do you think HF has a conspiracy against the Devs? Because most impartial parties on the mainboard say the Soucy trade was fair and the Devs got hosed for Dumo. Can we stop with the mid off between Fitz and Drury?

Now what is kinda weird is the Rags gave up the Sharks' 3rd, so basically a 2nd, no retention. At first I figured the Ducks wanted to retain for cap floor, but now I'm not so sure. Did the Devs really add value for that retention?? I'm not writing that off as a possibility now. And if that's the case....Fitz currently targeting EP would make it make sense...for better or for worse. Otherwise there's virtually no chance they need cap flexibility rn. Who knows.

Soucey sucks, the Dumo trade sucks and both GM's of the teams being mentioned are mediocre. Laugh a little, it's not that serious lol. Rags fans were talking shit all day yesterday on their board about Jack and every misfortune we have lol
 
If he doesn’t rebound, you are really left holding the bag. 11.6 until 2032. I don’t even know what a trade would look like.
maybe Mercer + Casey maybe as the base with picks added on
Meier has a NMC so no.

If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?


Needs retention for me to take that risk.
I don't think Vancouver would be interested in retaining for that many years, both for the cap and loss of a spot.


All this will be moot when it ends up with the Devils getting Ryan Donato :sarcasm:
 
Meier has a NMC so no.

If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?


Needs retention for me to take that risk.
So you think there will be retention on a 6 year deal but buying low on Crouse as suggested earlier is some outlandish take

What even lol
 
Meier has a NMC so no.

If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?


Needs retention for me to take that risk.
To add to this, if you don’t get Vancouver to retain at least $2.5 million you are setting up a higher floor to clear for the next Nico and Jack negotiations.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad