Zacha37
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2016
- 559
- 647
Hmmmmmmm
55 pt pace
70 pts last year
I wouldnt say no offense. And that Nash team is a MESS this season. Nothing going on.
True but Id give up Dano memes to see a ROR type replace HaulaWhen a player is as old as O’Reilly you really should be putting way more weight on this decline.
True but Id give up Dano memes to see a ROR type replace Haula
I also would take the risk, but its a huge boom bust hereI'd take the Pettersson risk, even if he doesn't rebound to what he was before he would still a role that the Devils would need to spend for (trade/fa) since they don't have center prospects and so you can take the high cap hit risk with the rising cap and Jack signed at 8m.
Ok, you guys look really silly saying Soucy is trash and cackling at Drury. He was solid the prior 2 seasons and has 1 more year at a reasonable cap. Pretty much every Van players has been awful outside of Quinn. If he doesn't workout, he can be moved easily. Do you think HF has a conspiracy against the Devs? Because most impartial parties on the mainboard say the Soucy trade was fair and the Devs got hosed for Dumo. Can we stop with the mid off between Fitz and Drury?
Now what is kinda weird is the Rags gave up the Sharks' 3rd, so basically a 2nd, no retention. At first I figured the Ducks wanted to retain for cap floor, but now I'm not so sure. Did the Devs really add value for that retention?? I'm not writing that off as a possibility now. And if that's the case....Fitz currently targeting EP would make it make sense...for better or for worse. Otherwise there's virtually no chance they need cap flexibility rn. Who knows.
Meier has a NMC so no.Meier + for EP40
Needs retention for me to take that risk.I also would take the risk, but its a huge boom bust here
maybe Mercer + Casey maybe as the base with picks added onIf he doesn’t rebound, you are really left holding the bag. 11.6 until 2032. I don’t even know what a trade would look like.
I don't think Vancouver would be interested in retaining for that many years, both for the cap and loss of a spot.Meier has a NMC so no.
If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?
Needs retention for me to take that risk.
So you think there will be retention on a 6 year deal but buying low on Crouse as suggested earlier is some outlandish takeMeier has a NMC so no.
If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?
Needs retention for me to take that risk.
To add to this, if you don’t get Vancouver to retain at least $2.5 million you are setting up a higher floor to clear for the next Nico and Jack negotiations.Meier has a NMC so no.
If we are truly in on EP40...there needs to be at least $2.5M retained. Not sure if Nemec would go the other way or maybe you swing Mercer+Casey++?
Needs retention for me to take that risk.
If they did it the idea would be 'figure it out in the summer'Getting EP40 would be crazy lol I don't even know how we could afford him.