I agree it should be meaningless; but what should be meaningless and what is reality can be mutually-inclusive and contradictory
Its ebbs and flows. Right now bruiser-style hockey is back with a vengeance, during a time where retaliatory hockey isn’t being allowed. Therefore, right now, size wins
You dont build a team for just next year so one more sub-6fter outside Jack and Jesper can work (if Mercer is moved). But would I want four of my top-9 being small and lacking physicality? Not in any era of hockey
And I dont consider Bratt’s 80 hits physical; there’s a difference between him and Marchand’s hits (and antics), for example. Hell, even Kucherov is a bigger pest
Tampa Bay is also a tough example considering their cap one year was 12 million above the allowed limit. I too would be okay having a extra few smaller guys if I could also have another 1st liner for free