It's hilarious to me when wings fans use the "Yzerman had nothing" excuse when It's not even true.
Because Yzerman started with Dylan Larkin.
I'm going to ask a question.
Why why Shanny able to do in 2 or 3 years what Yzerman hasn't been able to do in almost 6?
You want to talk about starting with NOTHING?
When Shanny got here there was no Nylander, he hadn't been drafted yet.
There was no Marner
There was no Matthews
There MIGHT have been a Rielly, I don't remember exactly when he broke in I know he was drafted.
But even if there was a Rielly he was FAR from developed.
There sure as hell was no Dylan Larkin to build around like Yzerman had.
Hell there wasn't even a Hyman, Johnsson or Kapanen yet.
There was NOTHING.
So my question is why is it that Yzerman was able to start with more, because he objectively did just by having Dylan Larkin.
And manage to do less with it then Shanny who, say what you want about playoffs, they haven't broken through yet, but they get there every year, they give themselves a shot every year.
They are currently leading the Atlantic whereas Detroit hasn't shown any progress in 9 years and 6 under Yzerman?
Why is that?
Why has Yzerman done less when he objectively started with more?
I suspect I know what the answer will be but It's not that simple.