This take is loud, but it misses a ton of context.
“A rebuild shouldn’t take six years if done correctly.”
What rebuild are you comparing it to?
I don't need to compare it to anything. It's a statement of fact. A proper rebuild does not take 6 (going on 7) years to yield a single playoff appearance if done correctly.
Detroit didn’t just need a retool — they needed a full teardown after the Holland era left them with no cap space, a bottom-tier farm system, and a bloated, aging core. This wasn’t flipping a few pieces — it was a ground-up restructure.
That's what the first 2-3 years were for fixing. By year 4, it's go time.
Go look at what Chicago is going through right now. Even Buffalo and Ottawa, who started earlier than Detroit, haven’t made the leap yet.
I couldn't care less about what other teams are doing. They're not being run by the supposed best GM in hockey.
In case you forgot, Ottawa has been in the playoffs since Detroit last was, and by all indications, they're going to be back in before Detroit is. And if "but but Buffalo" is your excuse, as in perhaps the worst-run franchise in all sports, your argument has failed.
“2-10 in their last 12, meltdown #3.”
Every team hits rough patches. That doesn’t erase the months of being in playoff contention with a roster that’s still maturing. And yes — collapsing down the stretch sucks, but growing teams often have to learn through those stumbles. This is still progress compared to where they were even 2 years ago.
They're at the point where they should be going through growing pains in the playoffs. What's your plan, to have Larkin's prime completely wasted? For Raymond and Seider to be 6 years into their careers before they finally appear in a playoff game?
“Cap flexibility misused at the deadline.”
The Wings didn’t go all-in because they weren’t a true contender — and that’s smart asset management. You don’t waste 1st-rounders or top prospects for rentals when your goal is sustained success. Talbot and Mrazek were cheap veteran placeholders, and Cossa has had exactly one full AHL season. Rushing goalies ruins more careers than it saves.
Nobody said trade the entire farm for Rantanen or something crazy.
Adding a depth piece at a low cost (the time for hoarding draft picks is over) to reward the team for turning the season around under McLellan wasn't unreasonable (and by all indications, the dressing room isn't happy that wasn't done.)
If Yzerman's intentions aren't to make serious additions to this team unless they're "Cup ready", that's a terrible strategy.
“Offseason signings were bad.”
Tarasenko and Gustafsson were short-term deals — low risk, possibly flippable at the deadline. As for Copp and Compher: every team needs middle-six depth and veteran centers who can play both ways. Overpaying slightly in free agency is normal — it’s not a Ken Holland mistake, it’s the price of insulating your youth.
Translation: More excuses for Yzerman's terrible offseason signings.
“The prospect pool has no elite talent.”
ASP is elite. Cossa is progressing well. Nate Danielson, Marco Kasper, Edvinsson, Mazur, Soderblom — that's not nothing. You don’t need a dozen elite guys. You need a core with supporting cast. The system has depth and upside. That’s how you sustain success.
ASP has the potential to be elite. Eveyrone else? Not so much. (If Cossa is progressing well, then why he is not with the team now? Why is Detroit actually content to go into next year with an aging Talbot and Mrazek's 3.50 GAA?)
“Fan patience is dwindling — he should be fired.”
Yzerman inherited a mess and has built a team that today is sniffing the playoffs with cap flexibility, a deep prospect pool, and key players (like Seider and Raymond) already in place. You want to throw that away because the timeline isn’t moving fast enough for you?
Oh look the "look what he inherited" excuse.
Irrelevant. It's year 6. This is a business. Start producing results, or you're fired.
(The majority of the fanbase feels the timeline isn't moving fast enough. Your kind, aka the "trust the Yzerplan" simps, is shrinking rapidly with each passing year.)
This isn’t NHL 24. Building a sustainable contender in the modern NHL takes time, patience, and smart decisions — not knee-jerk trades to chase a wildcard spot. Yzerman’s not perfect, but saying he “should have been fired by now” is just reactionary noise.
The Red Wings haven't made the playoffs since 2017. The time for patience is over.
You're free to continue to have that patience - something you don't get to do is get offended when fans start demanding more (like a single playoff spot after literally the longest drought in the team's near 100 year history) and are no longer content to "just wait for the kids", which is nothing but pure hopium.
Funny how the guy calling for Yzerman’s job still hasn’t built a coherent take in seven years. If patience isn’t your thing, maybe hockey’s not either—try microwave popcorn.
You're picking up your own scent with that take. This is the part where you need to recognize that you and everyone else continuing to bleat "trust the Yzerplan" who are content to wait until 2030 for the Red Wings to be back in the playoffs are in the extreme minority.
We've been patient enough. Take off the Yzerman jammies from 1998, turn off the 2002 Stanley Cup DVD, and start living in 2025.