Detroit Redwings Downfall

PanniniClaus

Registered User
Oct 12, 2006
11,082
4,872
Lalonde has been handed absolute shit... Kasper has had to be force fed 2nd line minutes. He's doing pretty well all things considered. Three players have over half a point per game.

This roster is covered in mediocre to below average players. Number of "skill" players way past their best. Young players that haven't yet hit their best and not enough in the middle .

Lalonde will succeed. Might not be here given this mess of a roster but this guy will find another job easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,725
11,291
Lalonde has been handed absolute shit... Kasper has had to be force fed 2nd line minutes. He's doing pretty well all things considered. Three players have over half a point per game.

This roster is covered in mediocre to below average players. Number of "skill" players way past their best. Young players that haven't yet hit their best and not enough in the middle .

Lalonde will succeed. Might not be here given this mess of a roster but this guy will find another job easily.

You can have Lalonde any day of the week. Terrible head coach, that should go back to being an assistant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
9,100
3,673
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
So you're basing this purely on team PR? The reality is that right now Detroit and Ottawa are both in roughly the same spot. And while Detroit does have a better prospect pool, Ottawa also has more young players playing in the NHL and contributing; essentially, they're where Detroit will be in 2 years. And technically, Detroit has been in the basement even longer than Ottawa, so it's not like Ottawa had more time to rebuild.

Mind you, this isn't a defense of Ottawa's rebuild, which I think has been pretty mediocre. I just don't think Detroit is in position to criticize.

I am going on what the GM has been repeating ad nauseam since his hiring, and by the evidence of his placeholder contacts. **EDIT: If Yzerman wanted to make a statement about winning, he would have fired the coach last week.

The opposite where OTT's GM declaring their rebuild is over and started spending draft capital foolishly.

Yzerman is hanging on to his draft capital (and trading for more; Matta) like gold. So far Yzerman has 8 draft picks this upcoming draft. OTT only has 6.

Both teams are equally as bad. One has lots of draft capital and an amazing prospect pool and up-and-coming players, whereas the other looks to be handing out HUGE contracts to overrated goalies and hoping for the best. No clear path in sight.

It's true that Talbot could return something if he continues his good form, though the market for goalies is rarely that rewarding. Chiarot or Petry could probably return a mid-round pick with retention, despite their poor play. But Copp and Compher have too many years left, and Kane and Tarasenko just look cooked. The trade deadline won't do much for Detroit.

Yup Lion or Talbot could return nice pieces. Kane could return something for scoring depth. Fischer or Motte could return for some bottom 6 energy/physical depth. Maybe a team out loses a bottom pairing dman and needs to fill a hole quickly, Petry is available. And probably the most valuable piece would be Berggren. Young player who's shown some tenacity and scoring ability.

It really depends on the demand come TDL. It's like death and taxes that teams love spending draft capital who think they can win a cup but need that extra depth. Yzerman can offer a cheap alternative.

I don't think you realize just how difficult it is to replace AND upgrade 35% of your roster with purely prospects in only a couple years. I actually really like Detroit's current prospect pool, but it's completely unrealistic to expect any development system to achieve this.

I don't think he needs to replace 35% through prospects. I think he just needs some kids to hit then he can fill gaps trading draft capital or UFA options. Right now UFAs aren't too interested in coming to Detroit, but as more kids hit, I think more UFA will be happy to come to an original 6 team with a historically strong pedigree of winning culture.

Let's be optimistic and go along with your scenario: let's say all those prospects (Danielson, MBN, Cossa, ASP and one of the rest) hit and are good NHL players within 2-3 years. Even in this scenario, Detroit still winds short a couple top-9 forwards and one top-4 Dman. And that's a big problem, because it's not like the team can rely on having a lot of elite offensive talent to compensate for a lack of depth. Even with all of Detroit's current most promising young players integrated into the lineup, this team isn't close to being a contender.

And that's ignoring the fact that things never go that smoothly in a rebuild. Detroit core players will inevitably experience bumps in the road, injuries, regression; that's just reality. And we haven't even touched on the fact that Larkin by then will have entered his 30s, and will likely regress (players that rely on their speed as much as Larkin rarely age that well), leaving a big hole at #1C that no current Detroit prospect can realistically fill.

Even if some of those aforementioned players don't hit, Yzerman has been known to trade underperformers for legit talent; see Jonathan Drouin trade Mikhail Sergachev 2017. That trade alone helped push Tampa over the hump.

I think it is easy to be optimistic with how much strong talent Yzerman has drafted, and looks like in 2025 he will be adding more to that.

Yzerman's special trading skills don't seem to have survived the transition to Detroit unscathed, because his trade record has not been that impressive in the past 6 years. Aside from the (admittedly solid) Debrincat acquisition

Yzerman isn't trading draft capital. Debrincat fell in his lap and was willing to sign a long contract, so he did. If say Eichel and Miro Heiskanen both fell in his lap in the same regard, he would more than happy use draft capital on those guys. And we would be having a completely different conversation.

As of right now, there's no need to use draft capital. Lets see what we have in the system before spending... Maybe MBN becomes something special and suddenly Yzerman is set on a #1 centerman for the foreseeable future. Maybe he's a bust. We don't know.

That's what TML did with the Tavaras UFA signing. Leafs could have used his cap hit in other ways so they actually could make it out of the 1st round... Yzerman doesn't appear interested in making those same mistake.

been mostly low-stakes garbage-in, garbage-out trades. The fact that he only added a single good non-draft piece to this team in 6 years is underwhelming. It's also part of the reason why this roster has so many holes right now, too many to be filled purely by prospects.

Refer to the top. He's been saying all along he's rebuilding. That's the bottom line that people can't seem to get to grips with.

Hey, maybe it's not Yzerman's fault that he lost the lottery and didn't get a swing at Stutzle or Hughes. Maybe he is using the cards he was given.

I do think Red Wings fans have a lot to be excited about. But I am sure it is frustrating. Luckily for them they get the NFL Lions to lean on and distract from the ongoing Yzerplan.
 

deca guard

Registered User
Jun 22, 2019
6,303
4,360
www.reddit.com
He is washed. They had all of last year to evaluate him. Hoping for anything above a savvy 50 point veteran player to be a 2nd line wheel/3rd line driver was wishful GMing.
you actually think yzerman isnt capable of judging how good an nhler is ? he knew the level of taresenkos current game and signed him because cap doesnt matter right now , and in effort to have a fellow russian around to help bushelnikov adjust if he crosses the pond next season . yzerman also knew that holl/chariot/petry were iffy too , but he doest want to be good right now and lessen his draft spot . hes in a holding pattern waiting for prospects to develop while not wanting to be a little bit better with ufa signings that cost future cap plus push us further back in the draft only to get crushed first round playoffs . obviously he cant state this pubically but this holding pattern is logically the best way to run a rebuild instead of signing better ufa that eek you into playoffs just to get crushed early , while worsening your draft posistion . yzerman critiques will all be silenced 2026/27 when redwings become a top 8 team for a decade
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirKillalot

GMR

Registered User
Jul 27, 2013
6,801
5,850
Parts Unknown
Lalonde has been handed absolute shit... Kasper has had to be force fed 2nd line minutes. He's doing pretty well all things considered. Three players have over half a point per game.

This roster is covered in mediocre to below average players. Number of "skill" players way past their best. Young players that haven't yet hit their best and not enough in the middle .

Lalonde will succeed. Might not be here given this mess of a roster but this guy will find another job easily.
Lalonde has no vision of what he wants this team to be. They play dump and don’t chase hockey. The talent does indeed suck but you have several teams each year that can be difficult to play against because of a system all the players can buy into. This team has no system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
9,100
3,673
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
you actually think yzerman isnt capable of judging how good an nhler is ? he knew the level of taresenkos current game and signed him because cap doesnt matter right now , and in effort to have a fellow russian around to help bushelnikov adjust if he crosses the pond next season . yzerman also knew that holl/chariot/petry were iffy too , but he doest want to be good right now and lessen his draft spot . hes in a holding pattern waiting for prospects to develop while not wanting to be a little bit better with ufa signings that cost future cap plus push us further back in the draft only to get crushed first round playoffs . obviously he cant state this pubically but this holding pattern is logically the best way to run a rebuild instead of signing better ufa that eek you into playoffs just to get crushed early , while worsening your draft posistion . yzerman critiques will all be silenced 2026/27 when redwings become a top 8 team for a decade

With how bad the prospect depth has been later rounds of the draft, a holding pattern is basically all he can do. Look at all the drafted players by year since 2019-2020 and maybe 2021, it's clear there's very little if anything outside the 1st round.
 

SirKillalot

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
6,124
478
Norway
My bad. Is Lombardi a centerman?
Initially I'd say yes he was/is, but if he will be that in the NHL. Idk. I'd say he is maybe a guy that reminds a little bit of Zetterberg of those within the organization. So yeah maybe. I think equally to Zetterberg if he makes the big show and sticks around he will be a tweener who could do both positions really well but not be top class, maybe be the responsible type.

And then if that goes for Danielson and Kasper and some of the others we add like ASP, MBN, etc, suddenly hey we got ourselves a fundamentally sound hockey team.

Something to remember when Zetterberg came into the NHL he turned 22 and had 3 years of men's hockey behind him from Sweden.
 

ClydeLee

Registered User
Mar 23, 2012
12,300
5,785
you actually think yzerman isnt capable of judging how good an nhler is ? he knew the level of taresenkos current game and signed him because cap doesnt matter right now , and in effort to have a fellow russian around to help bushelnikov adjust if he crosses the pond next season . yzerman also knew that holl/chariot/petry were iffy too , but he doest want to be good right now and lessen his draft spot . hes in a holding pattern waiting for prospects to develop while not wanting to be a little bit better with ufa signings that cost future cap plus push us further back in the draft only to get crushed first round playoffs . obviously he cant state this pubically but this holding pattern is logically the best way to run a rebuild instead of signing better ufa that eek you into playoffs just to get crushed early , while worsening your draft posistion . yzerman critiques will all be silenced 2026/27 when redwings become a top 8 team for a decade
So you're saying the talk and push that the Wings should be a playoff team this and the last 2 years hasn't been Yzermans push?

Wings fans who apparently thought negatively of the idea of Tanking pointed out back then that they never tanked and Yzerman was never tanking because of what he said and minor additions like perlini and Fabbri. So was Yzerman actually trying to tank and not saying it? Seems odd he can't say what his vision is when plenty other gms nowadays can during rebuilds.
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,516
24,762
Two Leafs pairings in the top 10 is wild

Best D in the league?
For this particular defenisve stat. Eg. I'm an Oil fan and certainly didn't expect to see any Oilers on the image.lol

It is funny to me though... I keep reading about how they are the best pair in the NHL based on these kinds of stats. To see them behind Hronek is funny.lol

ON a more serious note.. Ghost may be one of the comeback players of the year!

Removing stats.. it's Makar/Toews for me as best pair in the league. Wing's do have a nice pairing in Seider/Erv. I get what the fans are seeing.. Seider/Erv as a top pairing for the next 7 years (or however long is left in Seider's contract) and then ASP shows up and is a 60 point NHL dman. That may all happen and is reasonable to predict but I don't see that being a thing till 2027.
 

PanniniClaus

Registered User
Oct 12, 2006
11,082
4,872
Lalonde has no vision of what he wants this team to be. They play dump and don’t chase hockey. The talent does indeed suck but you have several teams each year that can be difficult to play against because of a system all the players can buy into. This team has no system.
Just looking at Lyon's numbers alone - he's improved from a 3.04 and .904 to a 2.85 and a .908 and he's the number 2 guy.

Talbot was 2.50 and .913 on a team that played a 1-3-1 almost exclusively in LA. He's at 2.67 and .921 here with Detroit so clearly Lalonde has made some strides to the team's defensive game.

Derek has been running these systems:

OZP: 2-3 - they used to call this center lock or middle lock. Ron Wilson ran this system to a Stanley Cup appearance with the Caps back in 98.. 2 man pressure with D pinches down either wall to keep pucks alive.

OZP: Off-Puck Movement - Lalonde had been tailoring the offensive game to Kane's ability to hold the puck and create, with other players moving to create space and lanes. Debrincat just seems to get more lazy by the day and Kasper is an excellent choice to be the energy combined with his other skills... It's a lot for a young guy to carry two players that don't do anything off the puck.

Teams key on Larkin/Raymond so if others aren't going to score.. trouble. The bottom 6 is absolute shit and that's on Yzerman.

OZ FC: 2-3 where they aren't quite as aggressive with the D until a battle is created , if one is created. The Wings don't really have the personnel across the roster to be good at this.. I question whether they have the roster to make any system work.. it is a pile of generally incompatible parts.


All the systems below are actually working quite well, teams don't have free sailing at the Wings through the NZ . The D zone is generally decent overall.
NZ FC: 1-2-2 or 1-1-3
DZ BO: Weak-Side Winger Wide
DZC: Man on Man/Collapsing

I would like to see the coach that could do much better with this roster... maybe there is one and I guess we may see soon enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Juha and GMR

SympathyForTheDevils

Registered User
Feb 22, 2010
1,075
1,105
Quebec City
Yup Lion or Talbot could return nice pieces. Kane could return something for scoring depth. Fischer or Motte could return for some bottom 6 energy/physical depth. Maybe a team out loses a bottom pairing dman and needs to fill a hole quickly, Petry is available. And probably the most valuable piece would be Berggren. Young player who's shown some tenacity and scoring ability.

It really depends on the demand come TDL. It's like death and taxes that teams love spending draft capital who think they can win a cup but need that extra depth. Yzerman can offer a cheap alternative.

What makes you think contenders are interested in players that can barely hang on to a depth role on a bottom-feeder? Kane has an NTC, and is borderline unplayable at EV. Fischer and Motte might return a late-round pick at best, if someone's desperate for a warm body who can PK. And if Berggren is a young player with tenacity and scoring ability, why wouldn't the Wings keep him? They desperately need this kind of player! Oh right, because he's 24 and pacing for a 16 pt season. NHL GMs can be stupid, but not that stupid.

I don't think he needs to replace 35% through prospects. I think he just needs some kids to hit then he can fill gaps trading draft capital or UFA options. Right now UFAs aren't too interested in coming to Detroit, but as more kids hit, I think more UFA will be happy to come to an original 6 team with a historically strong pedigree of winning culture.

Historically, UFAs are happy to go to teams that pay them more than everyone else. Which might actually be Detroit, given Yzerman's track record there, but that's more of a problem than a solution.

Even if some of those aforementioned players don't hit, Yzerman has been known to trade underperformers for legit talent; see Jonathan Drouin trade Mikhail Sergachev 2017. That trade alone helped push Tampa over the hump.

He was known to do that when supported by Tampa's scouting staff. Not so much in Detroit.

If he still had this amazing talent to turn nothing into gold, why would he have spent the last 6 years hiding it? Certainly Detroit has no shortage of underperformers that should be turned into legit talent.

I think it is easy to be optimistic with how much strong talent Yzerman has drafted, and looks like in 2025 he will be adding more to that.

Yzerman isn't trading draft capital. Debrincat fell in his lap and was willing to sign a long contract, so he did. If say Eichel and Miro Heiskanen both fell in his lap in the same regard, he would more than happy use draft capital on those guys. And we would be having a completely different conversation.

As of right now, there's no need to use draft capital. Lets see what we have in the system before spending... Maybe MBN becomes something special and suddenly Yzerman is set on a #1 centerman for the foreseeable future. Maybe he's a bust. We don't know.

MBN is a winger; I'm surprised that someone who's clearly very excited and hopeful for Detroit's prospects wouldn't know that.

You seem extremely confident that Yzerman's drafting ability will carry the Wings through the rebuild. But now that we're a few years removed from Yzerman's first couple drafts, we can start evaluating them. And frankly they don't really look that great. In those two years, the Wings had 23 picks total, including 6 2nd-rounders. And of these 23 picks, the only ones that "hit" were the top-10 picks; none of the others were successful (I guess we can wait and see for Al Johansson, who's getting time on Detroit's blueline this year, but the outlook isn't great). That's a disappointing outcome; most other basement teams during that period had more drafting success. Why do you expect his later drafts to be completely different?

Refer to the top. He's been saying all along he's rebuilding. That's the bottom line that people can't seem to get to grips with.

I think most people agree that he's rebuilding, what's contentious is whether he's rebuilding well. I look at the team Yzerman is building, and while I could certainly see them in a WC playoff spot in 3 years, I don't see much of a path for being a real contender. Not unless Yzerman suddenly starts hitting homeruns with every move, which he has mysteriously lost the ability to do in the past 6 years.
 
Last edited:

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,771
8,640
I've grown impatient with people. My first post was perfectly clear. It's not surprising that multiple people misread it when slightly more than half the population in the US and Canada read at below a 6th grade level.

The very first sentence of my first post inferred the Blues as the 1 team of the last 10 cup winners to not have a 1st or 2nd overall on the roster. 2 people misread it and posted to tell me I forgot the Blues.

And another person posted to tell me I forgot the Bruins, despite the Bruins not being one of the last 10 cup winners.
Yikes. All that smugness and then doesn't know the difference between implied and inferred.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,276
16,656
Alot of weird pairings in there. Not sure what this metric means. Better than nothing I guess.
Context is important. Yes, low xGA/60 is good. But not all pairings see the same opposition.

Here are all the names from that chart plotted against the quality of competition and offensive vs defensive zone deployment.

1732482920442.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,516
24,762
Context is important. Yes, low xGA/60 is good. But not all pairings see the same opposition.

Here are all the names from that chart plotted against the quality of competition and offensive vs defensive zone deployment.

View attachment 935106
So I see 4 quadrants.. which is the one you want your D in? Top left? Too right? Bottom left? Bottom right?
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,423
36,343
NJ
So I see 4 quadrants.. which is the one you want your D in? Top left? Too right? Bottom left? Bottom right?

The quadrants are just usage. The Y axis is quality of competition based on relative CF%. The X axis is OZ starts (which is largely by overrated by people because it ignores the vast majority of starts being NZ or on the fly). So you don’t want your D to be in any of the quadrants because it doesn’t actually indicate how well they’re playing. What matters more is the color. Blue good. Orange bad. Blue top left be best as they’re playing well against top competition with fewer OZ starts.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,276
16,656
So I see 4 quadrants.. which is the one you want your D in? Top left? Too right? Bottom left? Bottom right?
You want them above the x-line and you want them blue. Red is bad and below the x-line is sheltered so not really helping all that much as other D on the team are getting the hard matchups. Left and right is just faceoff starts. If the pairing is used more defensively, it'll be towards the left, offensively towards the right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,516
24,762
You want them above the x-line and you want them blue. Red is bad and below the x-line is sheltered so not really helping all that much as other D on the team are getting the hard matchups. Left and right is just faceoff starts. If the pairing is used more defensively, it'll be towards the left, offensively towards the right.
Appreciate it!
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,207
11,322
I think most people agree that he's rebuilding, what's contentious is whether he's rebuilding well. I look at the team Yzerman is building, and while I could certainly see them in a WC playoff spot in 3 years, I don't see much of a path for being a real contender. Not unless Yzerman suddenly starts hitting homeruns with every move, which he has mysteriously lost the ability to do in the past 6 years.
Draft picks alone won't make the Wings a contender. Something else has to go in their favor. Either someone steps up in a big way internally, they sign a free agent (which isn't as easy), or make a trade.

In TB, Point and Cirelli and Kuch were not first rounders. Drafted in rds 2 and 3 and became key and important pieces. As were the deals to bring in McDonaugh, Serg, and Cernak.

Hedman/Stamkos are better cornerstones than Raymond/Seider, but that's how the draft fell.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad