Zetterberg4Captain
Registered User
I'm not sold that we even wanted him to stay once we were able to sign Giroux. Seemed like a move to increase the ticket sales and buyer interest in the team before the sale.
That's an absurd comment
I'm not sold that we even wanted him to stay once we were able to sign Giroux. Seemed like a move to increase the ticket sales and buyer interest in the team before the sale.
When you won’t agree to a long-term contract with anyone but Detroit, obviously other teams backed off. Remember, another team tried. He was going to play for his arbitration award and become a UFA. The Sens we’re screwed because he had that power.I don't know how funny it is - I guess if you laugh at almost anything. Just be thankful that a good player wanted to play at home and his home happens to be Detroit. I think it happens about as often as good players wanting to play in Ottawa.
I thought he'd be worth more than he was, one of the worst returns for a decent player I can remember. Even with him wanting to go to Detroit, I just can't believe no one else wanted him - like - at all.
Shit happens though. We're lucky we got a 1st in there and we're really lucky we got Tarasenko and we're REALLY we didn't commit to DBC long term, because he wouldn't have been worth it IMO.
Twas a shit situation for Ottawa, yesWhen you won’t agree to a long-term contract with anyone but Detroit, obviously other teams backed off. Remember, another team tried. He was going to play for his arbitration award and become a UFA. The Sens we’re screwed because he had that power.
There was never any denying he was a good player, he just had long stretches last year where he didn't do much. Hopefully he can avoid that in Detroit, but....if he goes cold, he's not good for much.
For sure. Huge difference between his situation last year and playing with a fantastic two-way playmaking center in Larkin this year.
There was a lot of denying he was a good player both last year in the GDTs and also this year after the trade.There was never any denying he was a good player, he just had long stretches last year where he didn't do much. Hopefully he can avoid that in Detroit, but....if he goes cold, he's not good for much.
Not really. There were people who rightly said that he couldn't drive a line (although, I thought that he did....sometimes). There were people who rightly said Ottawa would be fools to sign him to a long term deal (I would have and probably regretted it), then there were people who were disgusted at his 2-way game (quite rightly considering he came out and said he dogged it a lot).There was a lot of denying he was a good player both last year in the GDTs and also this year after the trade.
There was a lot of denying he was a good player both last year in the GDTs and also this year after the trade.
Tufted Titmouse said:Dorion has been a brutal GM for years and now because he landed DeBrincat (high pick and only 1 year left on deal for the small, non-playdriving 10m winger...) and Giroux (over pay)
still early, but all signs are pointing towards this being the best contract since the old Mackinnon one
I knew the Sens were going to neuter him and they didWhen he became an Ottawa Senator, you called him:
Around the League - 2022 Off Season Edition
forums.hfboards.com
Now that he isn't, he's magically good again.
Playing with a 30 point center all year, yeah. No one is holding any delusions about the type of player he is. Elite goal scorer who has never done a great job of driving offense on his own. He does a great job of getting open for a playmaker to get him the puck for great goal scoring opportunities. But this is why he only got a 4 year deal, and not an 8 year deal (and yes, I'm well aware there is nowhere else in the league where he'd have signed a team friendly 4 year deal)There was never any denying he was a good player, he just had long stretches last year where he didn't do much. Hopefully he can avoid that in Detroit, but....if he goes cold, he's not good for much.
It doesn’t matter how long the Mackinnon one was, if Red Wings win the cup in the next 4 years, the contract is comparable.If he keeps this up, they'll have wished they signed him for more than 4 years.
MacKinnon was signed for 7.
It doesn’t matter how long the Mackinnon one was, if Red Wings win the cup in the next 4 years, the contract is comparable.
Best bang for your buck. How can you tell me the Stanley Cup is not the most valuable jewel ?Why doesn't it matter how long the contract is for?
Tufted Titmouse said:I knew the Sens were going to neuter him and they did
Yeah, probably. I think shit happens in hockey. We'll see what happens as the year progresses, but I think he'll be quite steady for Detroit - probably back to 40 goal form. Hopefully it doesn't cost us a playoff spot, but aside from that, I don't think anyone wishes him ill will in Ottawa, Maybe we're butthurt that he didn't want to sign, but he saved us in that regard too.Playing with a 30 point center all year, yeah. No one is holding any delusions about the type of player he is. Elite goal scorer who has never done a great job of driving offense on his own. He does a great job of getting open for a playmaker to get him the puck for great goal scoring opportunities. But this is why he only got a 4 year deal, and not an 8 year deal (and yes, I'm well aware there is nowhere else in the league where he'd have signed a team friendly 4 year deal)
Larkin doesn't have those down swings, he's pretty consistent. So if DeBrincat goes cold it would almost certainly be do to a shooting slump, but it won't be like last year where he was both in a prolonged shooting slump AND didn't play with a center who could drive offense and create opportunities for him on a nightly basis. No offence to Pinto who obviously has room to grow, he just isn't that dude as of yet. But yeah, I don't see any sort of a slump going anywhere near as bad in the current situation as it was for him last year. Perhaps if Norris wasn't hurt it woulda been a different story.
Best bang for your buck. How can you tell me the Stanley Cup is not the most valuable jewel ?
That’s a fair point and sure I can agree with what you are saying.Yeah, and if they had signed him for 7, maybe they get two jewels at a cheaper rate.
The upside of 4 years is that Detroit has flexibility in their salary structure if he doesn't live up to his salary or they need room for signing their up and coming prospects.
The downside of 4 years is that, if they do want to retain him, and he does produce at this league-leading rate, they'll have to re-sign him at that much higher salary with the cap at a higher position than it is now.
Detroit didn't choose to gamble on the DeBrincat contract and as a result, it will never hit the value of the MacKinnon one. That's fine, it was about mitigating the risk.
That’s a fair point and sure I can agree with what you are saying.
There may have been slight exaggeration on my end, and there’s better ways I can get my point across.
But in this regard, you’re correct.
As always I appreciate you for the thoughtful reply, NyQuil.
Dorion’s hands were tied in the end but he tied up his own hands by trading for the guy and stashing him on the 2nd line before realizing that Ottawa did not figure into his long-term plans.
In no world is the ADC contract comparable to the old Mackinnon one.It doesn’t matter how long the Mackinnon one was, if Red Wings win the cup in the next 4 years, the contract is comparable.
Okay, fine. But it’s still looking goodIn no world is the ADC contract comparable to the old Mackinnon one.
Well he didn't play very well in Ottawa. He clearly is capable of playing alot better. So it's not like the criticism wasn't justified. What happens if he gets disgruntled in Detroit? Will he mail it in? I am glad for them they only commited to Debrincat for 4 years. Sucks for an organization and its fans when you pay your hard earned money to watch these millionairs not put in an honest effort.There was a lot of denying he was a good player both last year in the GDTs and also this year after the trade.