StevenF1919
Registered User
Regardless of if the allegations are true or not, those tweets from Juventus are really, really bad.
Regardless of if the allegations are true or not, those tweets from Juventus are really, really bad.
Regardless of if the allegations are true or not, those tweets from Juventus are really, really bad.
Anyway, agree with Evilo, seems like the standard thing to do.
Why is it bad? It's their usual standards. 10 years ago, they felt innoncent too.
Fair enough, would’ve thought they would take a page out of Real’s handbook and stay silent like Perez did during CR’s tax case from not so long ago.
In a September 2009 questionnaire, Ronaldo confirmed that the woman "said no and stop several times", that "she said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available" and that "she kept saying 'No.' Don't do it. '" From December 2009 on, Ronaldo would answer the same question in a different manner and deny that anything non-consensual had happened.
Why is it that I could see a scenario where she was into it and had $ signs in her eyes and was saying no playfully but was welcoming it when I read the above?
That said I have no idea how common anal sex is without lube, if that were the case wouldn't there have been rectal tears and bleeding?
Juventus posting something like "it was a long time ago", as if that was a good defense. And then a tweet saying he's paid to score goals and he puts it in all the time.
Wording is different but everyone got the idea.
It's one thing to defend a player, it's another to pretty much say that the allegations happened 10 years ago and don't matter because he's a great champion.Why are they so particularly bad?
(I'll admit I just skimmed through them, didn't see anything particularly "bad" or out of the ordinary)
They're sticking by their player vs allegations that are far from proven in any way, shape or form, and who is saying he's innocent.
Again, I have no idea what happened in that room, but I think Juve's statement is fairly logical.
Anyway, agree with Evilo, seems like the standard thing to do.
And if anything does come out of it, they'll drop him like a hot potato.
According to her and the 2009 questionnaire, Ronaldo apologized to her after the act. Which suggests he was aware she didn't want it.
From the report:
"They tested her for sexually transmitted diseases and swabbed her mouth and rectum on the search for possible traces of DNA. Her injuries -- a circumferential swelling with bruising and a laceration -- were photographed."
Are you trying to get a job as Juve's social media guy?Anyone that has seen porn sees what a woman's rectum looks like after anal sex with a large partner, it does not look like it would feel very good to say the least. I have no idea what Ronaldo has down below relative to porn stars, but if he really did exactly as she says that is straight up terrible. Would it even be possible to rectally rape someone with no lube while they are clearly trying to avoid it? It would take a lot of force for penetration I would think, and it so she wouldn't be the only one in pain upon penetration IMO.