Del Zotto’s reps want meeting with Rangers GM to talk trade

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Meszaros is better than both of them combined. He is a better player overall. MDZ and Moore are not producing offensivly and they cant deffend.

No he isnt, he gets out of position too so you would hate him too
 
I know it's your opinion and you are entitled to it, but youa re wrong on some facts.
He has struggled for 2 years? Tell that to Torts when he was putting him as a top pair when Staal was injured and when he was on pace for 37 points season.
His shot accuracy, or lack thereof, has been addressed numerous times, he is about average for the NHL. There are multiple posts addressing this issue.
He is weak mentally? Starting as a 19 year old in the NHL for Torts and succeeding makes you mentally weak. I would argue the opposite.
Listen, you don't like Dz, we get it, but at least don't distort the facts.
And you still have not addressed the contradiction in your post, has he plateaued or does he need a change of scenery? Can't have it both ways.



He got paid is current salary because of what he accomplished. The way he is valued by the org is not exactly as a 3rd pairing Dman and other teams would get him not as a 3rd pairing Dman. Yes he is being railroaded by AV and you are building your whole argument around that, but it does not take away from the fact that it's not what his value is, and it's not what he accomplished.
Your argument is essentially wishful thinking and revisionist history.



IMO you're doing a bit of revising here. Before Staal's injuries he was regularly paired with Girardi. Girardi and McDonagh became the first pair after the first extensive period of Staal's being out of the lineup. Del Zotto has never been a first pairing defenseman on our team--he's been a second pairing but hasn't been able to hold onto that when all our D are healthy and hasn't deserved to be either.

I really don't know what to tell you. The Rangers drafted DZ with the hope that he'd become a decent enough defender but mainly with the idea that he'd create and produce offense from the blueline. Some people are happy with their main offensive D producing 35-40 point seasons--and meanwhile they ***** about the crap pwp. Rozsival--when he was here--put up similar offense and was a better defender. Just saying--that pwp was much better but mainly because Jagr could qb the pwp off the half wall and Nylander could hang onto the puck and make plays. No one to run it off the half wall now and DZ's had ample opportunity to prove he could and now it's McDonagh taking it away from him and the pwp improves. He's been marginalized within the Rangers defense structure. The Rangers pay Del Zotto to produce offense--not so much to defend. He's not producing--and you want to hold onto him and pay him more. DZ's point production since his rookie year went up marginally one year and has been down the other 3.

DZ played well last night but he only had one shot on goal. He took numerous shots. A bunch missed and a bunch were blocked--including one by Clarkson who limped off afterwards. More of the same--his shot not getting through or missing the net. Another hard pass/shot of his was deflected into the net by Boyle.
 
No he isnt, he gets out of position too so you would hate him too

Every D can get out of position, but Del Zotto is just lost. Meszaros got a big body. He is so Heavy. We need more size. Del Zotto cant handle big west coast forwards. Moore is not much better. Meszaros got a bigger potensial in the playoffs than those two. And yes he can get out of position, but MDZ is one of the worst in the League right now. He has to produce offensivly to stay in the NHL, but for some reason cant.
 
This situation has all the ear marks of not ending well for the Rangers.
 
Every D can get out of position, but Del Zotto is just lost. Meszaros got a big body. He is so Heavy. We need more size. Del Zotto cant handle big west coast forwards. Moore is not much better. Meszaros got a bigger potensial in the playoffs than those two. And yes he can get out of position, but MDZ is one of the worst in the League right now. He has to produce offensivly to stay in the NHL, but for some reason cant.

Meszaros is done... no thanks...
 
IMO you're doing a bit of revising here. Before Staal's injuries he was regularly paired with Girardi. Girardi and McDonagh became the first pair after the first extensive period of Staal's being out of the lineup. Del Zotto has never been a first pairing defenseman on our team--he's been a second pairing but hasn't been able to hold onto that when all our D are healthy and hasn't deserved to be either.

There you go again distorting facts.

1 - DZ has been a top 4 on this team. He has averaged top 4 minutes last 3 seasons (Except this one where he is averaging top 5 minutes). Not only he deserved being top 4, but many nights he was the best Ranger D man on the ice.
2 - When Staal went down with his eye injury, Torts split up the Girardi-McDonagh pair and gave DZ top pairing minutes with Girardi. This is well publicized and basic googling skills can remind you if you forgot. Go back and look from about mid march to mid april of last season. So, you are wrong when you state that he has never been a top pair for the Rangers.

We also know this from the most common D pair from last season.

Defenseman -- Defenseman -- Frequency
DAN GIRARDI - RYAN MCDONAGH -- 23.74%
JOHN MOORE -- STEVE EMINGER --- 20.02%
DEL ZOTTO --- ANTON STRALMAN -- 18.63%
DEL ZOTTO --- DAN GIRARDI ------- 15.86%
STRALMAN ---- RYAN MCDONAGH -- 13.48%
DAN GIRARDI -- JOHN MOORE ------ 2.13%
RYAN MCDONAGH - STEVE EMINGER - 1.68%

Maybe this is not enough, how about we go ask the coach himself?

Tortorella on how Del Zotto has helped Rangers defense stay strong despite absence of Marc Staal, and how he challenges Del Zotto to stay at that level: “I think it’s a huge step for Michael – stay there now. This is where he’s fluctuated before, but now he’s gone through a bit of a process. He’s been more mature. I’m hoping he can handle that mentally, that ‘You know what? I’ve been there, I’ve been playing well, now I need to stay there.’ And he may even get better when you have an injury like we have with Marc.’

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...ralman-michael-del-zotto-chris-kreider-as-ny-

Since Marc Staal was injured on 3/5, Michael Del Zotto has not played fewer than 20 minutes and 51 seconds in a game.

Last night against Philly, Del Zotto played nearly 27 minutes and had two assists.

After the Rangers win last night, John Tortorella said on MSG that Del Zotto played “very well.”

Tortorella said earlier in the week that Del Zotto is putting himself into the position of leading the Rangers defense, “why can’t it be him to lead the way? He is not a young kid anymore, he has played quite a bit in the league. He is improving defensively and has made some really good plays to spring people.”

At Monday’s practice, John Tortorella said that Del Zotto was “terrific” against the Capitals and assuming and thriving in a much larger role without Marc Staal in the lineup.

The key, Tortorella says, is getting Del Zotto to play at a high level consistently.

http://snyrangersblog.com/2013-14/2...read-why-cant-michael-del-zotto-lead-the-way/

By the way, I am not saying that he was the best Dman all the time during that stretch, but some of the time. For instance the Girardi - McD was reunited on April 11th because DZ struggled the game before

John Tortorella reunited Ryan McDonagh and Dan Girardi on his top defensive pair Wednesday night, and the move served to stabilize the Rangers’ play in their own zone in a 3-2 shootout win over the Toronto Maple Leafs at the Garden.

“The last two games we haven’t defended the way we needed to,” Tortorella said Wednesday afternoon before the game. “Certainly around our net, in Carolina, that’s where it is. Our ‘D’ have moved away from our net when they don’t have to. So we need to straighten that out.”

Michael Del Zotto had played the previous six games alongside Girardi as Tortorella sought to balance his defensive pairs with Marc Staal out and Del Zotto playing at a high level. But Del Zotto was caught out of position several times in Monday’s 4-3 loss in Toronto, leading to the switch back Wednesday night to last year’s dynamic pair of McDonagh and Girardi.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...eunite-on-top-defensive-pairing-ny-rangers-to

Some people are happy with their main offensive D producing 35-40 point seasons

What's wrong with a 23 year old averaging 35-40 points a season? How many of those do the Rangers have?
DZ's had ample opportunity to prove he could and now it's McDonagh taking it away from him and the pwp improves. He's been marginalized within the Rangers defense structure. The Rangers pay Del Zotto to produce offense--not so much to defend. He's not producing--and you want to hold onto him and pay him more. DZ's point production since his rookie year went up marginally one year and has been down the other 3.

This one takes the cake, so the PP improved because McDonagh took DZs spot?
Having a new PP coach had nothing to do with it? :shakehead

If you want to argue that DZ has not been consistently good during his tenure, I'd agree with you but you went a lot further than that without any facts to back you up.
DZ might as well be traded. But the way he has been railroaded by AV hurts the org. He has driven his value to the ground and you and some others seem to enjoy it.
I'd expect you to want what's best for the Rangers being a fan, but you are more interested in peddling non truths for whatever reason.
 
I keep seeing the numbers 23 and 41 thrown around. Del Zotto's young, we get it. Del Zotto had 1 excellent season, great. The same season which in the playoffs he completely pooped himself in the Devils series; he was atrocious. The fact of the matter is that his play has completely nose dived. He has been a liability defensively, and below average offensively for quite a long stretch of time. When you get bent over on a 1 on 1 by Brent Sutter, you have serious problems.

He also couldn't hit the side of a barn on a cool summer day off the rush OR on the PP, and hence my username was born

We're not going to get anything of value for this guy unless Sather pulls a Sather. Just keep him and hope he can get himself out of this funk. He's really not as bad as he's played lately, but I don't think he's THAT much better either
 
Tbf these are your opinions I bolded and not facts. For instance you seem to have an opinion on what two years is. Two years should include this year, last year and a part of the year that you mentioned but not the whole thing. Looking at this year and last year as the majority of these "2 years" he has regressed and the point was valid.

You can cut the 2 years anyway you want, his point is still not valid.

Succeeding under Torts = tough is an opinion.

I agree, I thought my choice of words made it clear it was.

He is weak mentally? Starting as a 19 year old in the NHL for Torts and succeeding makes you mentally weak. I would argue the opposite.

If it was not clear enough, I hope it is now.
 
I keep seeing the numbers 23 and 41 thrown around. Del Zotto's young, we get it. Del Zotto had 1 excellent season, great. The same season which in the playoffs he completely pooped himself in the Devils series; he was atrocious. The fact of the matter is that his play has completely nose dived. He has been a liability defensively, and below average offensively for quite a long stretch of time. When you get bent over on a 1 on 1 by Brent Sutter, you have serious problems.

He also couldn't hit the side of a barn on a cool summer day off the rush OR on the PP, and hence my username was born

We're not going to get anything of value for this guy unless Sather pulls a Sather. Just keep him and hope he can get himself out of this funk. He's really not as bad as he's played lately, but I don't think he's THAT much better either

There are plenty of posts that dispels the notion about his shot accuracy. But your nickname reflects more on you than DZ.
 
There are plenty of posts that dispels the notion about his shot accuracy. But your nickname reflects more on you than DZ.

There's a reason AV ripped Del Zotto off the PP. He gave him chances throughout the year and decided he'd seen enough. There's a reason for that, which happens to be my new user name :naughty:
 
Meszaros is better than both of them combined. He is a better player overall. MDZ and Moore are not producing offensivly and they cant deffend.

Yeah, no.

This board would hate Meszaros his first shift. He's just awful now.
 
Kwayry your posts are so great. Nice to see facts actually used on Del Zotto, instead of the garbage posters spew here.
 
Meszaros is better than both of them combined. He is a better player overall. MDZ and Moore are not producing offensivly and they cant deffend.


When the flyers couldn't win a game and their fans wanted to hang the whole team he was their first choice.
 
I keep seeing the numbers 23 and 41 thrown around. Del Zotto's young, we get it. Del Zotto had 1 excellent season, great. The same season which in the playoffs he completely pooped himself in the Devils series; he was atrocious. The fact of the matter is that his play has completely nose dived. He has been a liability defensively, and below average offensively for quite a long stretch of time. When you get bent over on a 1 on 1 by Brent Sutter, you have serious problems.

He also couldn't hit the side of a barn on a cool summer day off the rush OR on the PP, and hence my username was born

We're not going to get anything of value for this guy unless Sather pulls a Sather. Just keep him and hope he can get himself out of this funk. He's really not as bad as he's played lately, but I don't think he's THAT much better either

Pronger got "bent over" by Dawes 1 on 1 once and Pronger seemed to be ok after that. DZ is no Pronger but bent over is a pretty dumb thing to say, especially when it happens to other players.
 
It is mind numbing when I think of all the players this franchise has given up on over the years.

Mark my words, we let this kid go and we'll hate it in the years to come.
 
The problem is we have little choice now. This environment has become toxic for DZ. When his agents are asking to meet with our management about getting him moved, it's pretty clear that the player no longer wants to be in this situation. The only thing left is to hope we can still squeeze good value out of him and all call Glen (actually that should really probably be Alain) and leave 'told ya so' voicemails in a few years when DZ is doing well elsewhere.
 
AV completely destroyed ballard here in vancouver.....a player that had put up three very good seasons. You guys are very astute to see the problem with AV so quickly. It took vancouvef fans a lot longer. He will lay waste to assets no matter what the gm thinks...no matter what they cost to acquire or the implications of his decisions for the gm...luongo, ballard, hodgson

You will see you share of tanner glass types. I am so happy he's not in vancouver.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad