Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: David Reinbacher - Get Well Soon Edition

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Man what a great thing. We have traversed a lot of ground with this kid over the years. Because of Michkov and the injury we just assume he's a bust. Not the case. Draft reports had him as a Seider level talent. He's starting to show it. Unreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson and MarkovsKnee
I was at the game on Saturday. And Reinbacher looked real good live. He's steady, plays a simple game, uses his body well to separate players from the puck and uses his reach to angle a player from getting into the danger area. Him and Engstrom make a real good pairing.

Nothing exciting about his game. But in a hockey smart market like Montreal, his kind of game will be appreciated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dralaf, nicehiss, Andrei79 and 7 others
Adam Michaels said:
I was at the game on Saturday. And Reinbacher looked real good live. He's steady, plays a simple game, uses his body well to separate players from the puck and uses his reach to angle a player from getting into the danger area. Him and Engstrom make a real good pairing.

Nothing exciting about his game. But in a hockey smart market like Montreal, his kind of game will be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Great to hear.............in a couple of seasons, I think we are going to be a very happy crew with this pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: badfish and EveryDay
DAChampion said:
We should have been happy the entire time, as the complaints have been nonsensical.
Click to expand...
I don,t agree. It's a concept of value of pick. I wasn't a fan of a pick, but I ALWAYS SAID FROM THE GET GO that I have no doubt David would be a serviceable NHL player. No doubt. But at 5 with a possible generational player available...you don't aim serviceable. That was my point. And it also comes down to BPA vs Needs. It's not nonsensical when we are actually constant in our opinion.

Frankly....turn this around....we all love Demidov right? We can't wait for him to get here and we are already calling him a steal and a potential 80-point player no? Well...what if I tell you that for need purposes we went Anton Silyaev, 'cause let say we were short on Left D and had a chance to pick a towering 6'7'' player? After seeing Silyaev play and liking his game...would you have said the same thing? 'Cause Silyaev might very well be a very good player in this league. I mean, maybe even better than David. But....Demidov???

Having said all of that, and I go back to my original point as far as David is concerned...we did get a very good player that will help us. No doubt.
 
Whitesnake said:
I don,t agree. It's a concept of value of pick. I wasn't a fan of a pick, but I ALWAYS SAID FROM THE GET GO that I have no doubt David would be a serviceable NHL player. No doubt. But at 5 with a possible generational player available...you don't aim serviceable. That was my point. And it also comes down to BPA vs Needs. It's not nonsensical when we are actually constant in our opinion.

Frankly....turn this around....we all love Demidov right? We can't wait for him to get here and we are already calling him a steal and a potential 80-point player no? Well...what if I tell you that for need purposes we went Anton Silyaev, 'cause let say we were short on Left D and had a chance to pick a towering 6'7'' player? After seeing Silyaev play and liking his game...would you have said the same thing? 'Cause Silyaev might very well be a very good player in this league. I mean, maybe even better than David. But....Demidov???

Having said all of that, and I go back to my original point as far as David is concerned...we did get a very good player that will help us. No doubt.
Click to expand...

There was a possible generational player available?

Who?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Deebs
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom