Prospect Info: David Reinbacher - Get Well Soon Edition

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
HATERS WHERE YOU AT?????????


1000068898.gif
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: Tuggy and bopeep
You can't wait a little? Are you at the fastfood drive-thru waiting for your order? Lol. :laugh::sarcasm:
I just think it’s silly to say that Dach’s knee is better than ever and that his surgery wasn’t a big deal.

Dach can protect the puck with his body and deke, but his lateral mobility is bottom tier. Maybe he can get away with it as 2C but Reinbacher will need to rely on his pivots way more to play effective man to man defense in our system
 
I just think it’s silly to say that Dach’s knee is better than ever and that his surgery wasn’t a big deal.

Dach can protect the puck with his body and deke, but his lateral mobility is bottom tier. Maybe he can get away with it as 2C but Reinbacher will need to rely on his pivots way more to play effective man to man defense in our system
Dach's knee injury was much more severe. His knee was tore in 2 places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAChampion
Watch him return for the last ~20 games of the year in Laval, then get the call up to the big team for the playoffs and step in with impact like PK did in his first NHL PO's
:yo:
With Trudeau apparently having been injured last night against Utica, that Laval defence without Jacobs, is really slow and vulnerable. If Trudeau is out for any extended period, that team will need help on the back end. So if and when he is ready, Reinbacher would be a welcome and needed addition in Laval.
 
Last edited:
Trade him, there's too much risk and the reward is questionable

My reasons to trade him:

-Price screwed his name (1st reason)
-Fans wanted another player (2nd reason)
-Injuries
-Defenders are harder to develop
-He might not be ready for when the team is ready to compete, next year or even the next one
-We can use him in a package deal to get something good now that will help Hutson and the team immediately and for the following 3-4 years.
lol he’s right shooting top 5 pick d man. And 20 years old. What a stupid post.
 
lol he’s right shooting top 5 pick d man. And 20 years old. What a stupid post.

Oh you're one of those guys that see him as a 5th OA pick, arent you?

And then you come here insulting other people's posts.

You're playing an intersting character sir
 
I’d say that’s closer to his floor.

If all goes well he’s a top pairing guy all day.

If the knees are fine he’ll be a top 4 all day. The only clear weakness I saw was defending against the rush.
Apparently he is very mobile. Gets on opponents fast. I really hope his skating is not damaged.
 
The Roy trade, the Leclair trade, the Chelios trade. Man we made some idiotic trades then. The Leclair trade may have been the best one lol. At least got the best return. Savard was washed more or less when we got him
The chelios for savard trade was the worst ever. But apparently there were internal problems with chelios. Still. Awful trade. I was really pissed at it. Just stupid. Habs should have got much more than a washed up former star. I hated the trade then. Still hate it now.

Oh you're one of those guys that see him as a 5th OA pick, arent you?

And then you come here insulting other people's posts.

You're playing an intersting character sir
Not interested. Let’s talk hockey.
 
I just think it’s silly to say that Dach’s knee is better than ever and that his surgery wasn’t a big deal.

Dach can protect the puck with his body and deke, but his lateral mobility is bottom tier. Maybe he can get away with it as 2C but Reinbacher will need to rely on his pivots way more to play effective man to man defense in our system

What evidence do you have that Kirby Dach has "bottom tier" lateral mobility?

I certainly don't see that watching him skate.

Oh you're one of those guys that see him as a 5th OA pick, arent you?

And then you come here insulting other people's posts.

You're playing an intersting character sir

Is this for real?

One of those guys that 'see him' as a 5th OA pick? He is a 5th overall pick. What on earth are you talking about?
 
The Roy trade, the Leclair trade, the Chelios trade. Man we made some idiotic trades then. The Leclair trade may have been the best one lol. At least got the best return. Savard was washed more or less when we got him

By no means am I suggesting that Savard for Chelios was a good trade, but I would heavily dispute the notion that Savard was washed up when he was acquired.

An enormous part of his drop in production with the Canadiens is the fault of Pat Burns.

Burns made idiotic demands on Savard and essentially demanded he stop doing all of the things that made him a special player in the first place.

The way Burns handled Savard would be like buying a Lamborghini Countach and then putting a snow plow on the front of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino
By no means am I suggesting that Savard for Chelios was a good trade, but I would heavily dispute the notion that Savard was washed up when he was acquired.

An enormous part of his drop in production with the Canadiens is the fault of Pat Burns.

Burns made idiotic demands on Savard and essentially demanded he stop doing all of the things that made him a special player in the first place.

The way Burns handled Savard would be like buying a Lamborghini Countach and then putting a snow plow on the front of it.
Oh really? I thought we got him the year of 93 with Demers. My bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tazsub3
Oh you're one of those guys that see him as a 5th OA pick, arent you?

And then you come here insulting other people's posts.

You're playing an intersting character sir
What are you talking about? It's fact that he was selected 5th overall. The reality that he shouldn't have been selected in the top 15 does nothing to alter it.
 
The chelios for savard trade was the worst ever. But apparently there were internal problems with chelios. Still. Awful trade. I was really pissed at it. Just stupid. Habs should have got much more than a washed up former star. I hated the trade then. Still hate it now.


Not interested. Let’s talk hockey.
look on paper and what cheliios did after, we can call the savard trade a disaster. But the main exception we won a cup with him on the team, yes he did not play much in the playoffs, but i think him being on the team helped winning the cup and if you ask me now , there is no one player i would trade for a cup.
 
Oh really? I thought we got him the year of 93 with Demers. My bad.

That was his final season with the Canadiens, and a year he got pushed down the depth chart because Serge Savard had got out and acquired offensive players like Vincent Damphousse and Brian Bellows to compliment Kirk Muller who had been brought in a year earlier.

Savard only played one season under Demers.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad