JHS
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2013
- 1,690
- 1,288
1. I played college hockey, but that's totally irrelevant to this discussion.
2. Shesterkin performed as expected. Many picked him as part of the conversation for ROY.
3. If you believe Laf and Kakko performed better statistically than expected, you're alone in that belief.
4. If faceoffs can be taught effectively, why don't players get better?
5. If you don't believe that Mika's 1st half performance negatively affected the Rangers place in the standings, you might be alone in that, too.
6. If you knew before the season that Fox would have a Norris type year in addition to what happened to their best forward, their best goal scorer, and their highest scoring defenseman, and you would have thought that would net to a better season, I would have laughed at that idea. Funny thing is, you would have, too.
But you are making my point for me-- the team had all these things HAPPEN and the results were still a missed playoff season. How does this not equate as an underperformance? Mica's injury, whether it be a virus or injury is par for the course and of course impacted the season. I said that but my exact point is, a better prepared team would have managed that situation better. Why was he still getting paraded out there with almost the same minutes he was at the end of the season? Seems like that's poor coaching to me.
Fox OVERACHIEVED and, likely so did Laf and Kappo--a 20 goal season( on pace for it) in your first and second year is not entirely common) Igor, OVERACHIEVED and played far above what could be realistically expected from second year goalie. And yet- here we are, still missing the playoffs. So if these guys all perform exactly this way again next year, which seems like a reach-- but let's just assume so for this discussion-- and the coach remains the same-- is your assumption the team will magically get better or are you of the mindset that destiny controls everything and it will "just be as it is."?
Your coach must have been awful then if you don't remember spending hours working on faceoffs during practice including how to improve off the drop of the puck. It's literally one of the most practiced skills besides shooting and skating. To each his own though-- it's a conclusion you can make but don't use it to defend Quinn because somehow, despite having over 10 different players playing center during his time with the club, poor faceoffs have been a common trend here. And, as I'm sure you are aware- faceoffs are effort plays more than many others in hockey. That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the guy either.