How is army not ok with the term 5 years?
However he's perfectly fine with Bouwwmester and Lehtera long term?
How is army not ok with the term 5 years?
However he's perfectly fine with Bouwwmester and Lehtera long term?
Frank and Petro are both signed to 5+ year contracts.
I think Army's fine with going 5+ if it helps the team in the long run(like signing Schwartz). It didn't make sense to do that with Backes.
Say what you want about Army's return on trades, but when Lehtera's the worst contract the Blues have and no one has a NMC with expansion coming up, I'd say that's he's done a good job at at least negotiating contracts.
How is army not ok with the term 5 years?
However he's perfectly fine with Bouwwmester and Lehtera long term?
I think Backes at 5 would have been fine. Reward the guy for everything he's done and been through all these years. Plus who's gonna match up with the big centers of the west now
3 years for Lehtera is long term? JBo was 5 but he was younger than Backes (30 v 32) and defenseman generally age better than forwards. That was a mistake in Jbo's case because he relies so much on his speed, and we are seeing him decline. But in general, D can play well until their late 30s where forwards start to decline a few years earlier.
3 years for Lehtera is long term? JBo was 5 but he was younger than Backes (30 v 32) and defenseman generally age better than forwards. That was a mistake in Jbo's case because he relies so much on his speed, and we are seeing him decline. But in general, D can play well until their late 30s where forwards start to decline a few years earlier.
The return for Oshie was not good value, correct.
But as for the latter three points you brought up regarding the third pick, Brouwer, and Oshie, my rebuttal is this.
1. The third was used to trade to up to get Thompson. If Bill Armstrong thought he was the BPA and worth while to draft, I don't see how the pick was "unnecessarily" given up to move up 3 spots to pick Thompson.
2. The whole point as to why Brouwer was the NHL player returned for Oshie is he because he was a FA after 2015-2016. Him having a good POs, IMO, changed a lot of people's views about him. I don't think a lot of us would've been pining for him to return if the Blues were bounced after the 1st
3. Like Brouwer, this was Oshie's first playoff run in which he was a consistent performer. Like Brouwer, Oshie was considered a ghost in the postseason prior this year's playoffs. I don't think Oshie would've had that same run in St. Louis, likewise, I don't think Brouwer would've produced like he did if he remained in DC.
Just thinking back to when Backes signed the offer sheet with VAN..what would we have gotten had we chosen not to match?
Probably same reason why Stastny only got 4 years. Ownership doesn't like those long contracts. Vladimir and probably Schwartz being the exception.
Pietrangelo on a 7 year deal, Tarasenko on an 8 year deal, Schwartz will go near max term, and I'd bet so will Parayko and Fabbri.
They don't like long term contracts for guys over 30 maybe, which is fairly common because of the risk.
Kind of happy for him what kind of career he did, but sadness he should have deserved Cup. Heart and soul on and off ice. Great person for community.
Kind of happy for him what kind of career he did, but sadness he should have deserved Cup. Heart and soul on and off ice. Great person for community.
Kind of happy for him what kind of career he did, but sadness he should have deserved Cup. Heart and soul on and off ice. Great person for community.