koteka
Registered User
I am disappointed we are having this discussion.
- I am usually one of the first to give up on a prospect whether it was Stenlund who I was right about or Bemmer who I think I am right about or Foudy who might still prove me wrong. But there is no way I am ready to give up on a 23 year old goalie who has shown some flashes that he could be a good NHL goalie.
- People griping about how we gave up too soon on JAM, Karlsson, DuClaire, etc but see no problem giving up on a young goalie who shouldn't have even played in the NHL last season because he wasn't ready.
- We spent this entire season bitching about how dreadful our defense was and how we left our goalies out on an island way too many times but don't have an issue with suggesting a young goalie won't cut it in the NHL based on his showing behind this pourous defense.
The way for Tarasov to develop into the goalie we hope he will become is to play in the AHL and get a steady diet of games. Backing up Elvis and playing the better opponent in a back to back games because we are afraid to lose him is not going to make Tarasov an NHL goalie. Making him the starter behind a revamped defense running a new system at the start of the season is not going to make Tarasov an NHL goalie. I see the choice more as sending him to Cleveland to let him develop or keeping him in Columbus and likely ruining his development.
Is there a chance he is claimed if we put him on waivers? Yes, but I think it is pretty low. Other teams will realize we are waiving him because we think he needs to develop in the AHL. We are are a team with a bad goals against average and a reputation of rushing prospects. Other teams will recognize that and think twice before claiming him.