Player Discussion: Damon Severson

Wanted to bump this quick to throw some praise at 78. He took the benching like a man and came back a better player. He's always been dynamic in transition. If he figures the D zone out he's gonna be good.

Happy for him, it was never an effort thing. He just needed to dumb down his game, which he has IMO.
 
Wanted to bump this quick to throw some praise at 78. He took the benching like a man and came back a better player. He's always been dynamic in transition. If he figures the D zone out he's gonna be good.

Happy for him, it was never an effort thing. He just needed to dumb down his game, which he has IMO.
Keep it simple should be everyone's mantra. Making things harder than they need to be has been the downfall of many people including some previous coaching and management here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteelCityCannon
Keep it simple should be everyone's mantra. Making things harder than they need to be has been the downfall of many people including some previous coaching and management here.
100% agree.

To the untrained eye, I think Evasons biggest win so far has been letting the guys just play. Most of them aren't overthinking it. Just letting loose. Guys like Fantilli are going to benefit big time from that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBJx614
He just needed to dumb down his game, which he has IMO.

He's also been up in the play a lot more, playing rover. So I don't know if I'd summarize the change as "keep it simple". He had to play with a harder edge in his zone and take some risk off his breakout passes.
I think it might have been an effort thing. :popcorn:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LJ7
He's also been up in the play a lot more, playing rover. So I don't know if I'd summarize the change as "keep it simple". He had to play with a harder edge in his zone and take some risk off his breakout passes.
I think it might have been an effort thing. :popcorn:
I'll accept that. Maybe I'm just basing if off not having one of his great set up passes in our slot to the other team lately. Let's just hope he can keep it up.
 
He's also been up in the play a lot more, playing rover. So I don't know if I'd summarize the change as "keep it simple". He had to play with a harder edge in his zone and take some risk off his breakout passes.
I think it might have been an effort thing. :popcorn:
Part of that is just his role in the system but what I bolded is the definition of keeping it simple in my mind.

Not every pass has to be a "hero" pass on the highlight reel.
 
Part of that is just his role in the system but what I bolded is the definition of keeping it simple in my mind.

Not every pass has to be a "hero" pass on the highlight reel.

Yes that part is simplified, but he's doing a lot more in the other parts of his game. He's more active in both ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoeBartoli
Good share.
Fans seem to need a whipping boy, and their sites got set on Severson, likely due to his contract.
He's good, and he's being used properly now. Sitting him a couple games helped too.
 
One month ago, Columbus Blue Jackets defenseman Damon Severson was in the headlines for all of the wrong reasons: garish turnovers, lengthy benchings and healthy scratches, the sad progression of a veteran blue liner who had lost his way.

A funny thing has happened over the last three weeks: nobody’s talking about Severson’s play these days, even though they should be.
The Blue Jackets relegated Severson to the third pairing once they recalled top defensive prospect Denton Mateychukfrom AHL Cleveland, and his ice time has dipped because of it. But Severson has reclaimed his game by taking a noticeably more conservative approach.

“I’m just being myself,” Severson said. “Simple plays. Those plays we’ve talked about (the turnovers) … nobody says anything about it if it works out, right? But if it doesn’t, you’re in trouble. So why even risk it?

“I’d rather play than have to deal with all of that crap.”

It’s probably hard to imagine what a healthy scratch feels like for a veteran player, much less one in the second year of an eight-year contract that carries a $6.25 million salary cap hit.

Blue Jackets coach Dean Evason, who ultimately made the decision to sit Severson, played more than 800 games in the NHL.

“All of your emotions come into it,” Evason said. “You’re mad, embarrassed, pissed off … all of it. But he used it in the right direction.

“He didn’t disrupt his teammates because of it. I don’t want to say he accepted it because he didn’t, right? He didn’t want to be out of the lineup. But he handled it the right way. Like a professional. If you’re positive and your attitude is correct, which his was, you’re going to be all right when you get back in.”

Since enduring back-to-back healthy scratches on Jan. 4 vs. the St. Louis Bluesand Jan. 7 vs. the Pittsburgh Penguins, Severson is back to being a lineup regular. In nine games, he has 0-3-3 and a plus-6 rating, averaging 16:16 in ice time per game.

The Blue Jackets will lean on him again at 10 p.m. tonight when they open a crucial four-game road trip against the Vegas Golden Knights in T-Mobile Arena.

“(Severson) has been playing simple and he’s competing,” Evason said. “When you get guys with a skill set like he has, sometimes you try to do too much. That was our only message (as a coaching staff). He’s simplified in areas where maybe there were turnovers in the past. It’s been an effort, a conscious effort to simplify his game.”
Blue Jackets defenseman Zach Werenskitook exception to some of the criticism that’s been levied at Severson during his two seasons in Columbus.

“I think a lot of it is unfair,” Werenski said. “He’s a guy who’s been around for a long time, 700-plus games. When he makes a mistake and it ends up in our net, it doesn’t look great. But if it doesn’t end up in our net, is anybody talking about it? I make a lot of mistakes, too. That tying goal in our last game (by the Los Angeles Kings late in regulation on Saturday): I shoot it up the middle twice (clearing attempts) and it finally hits a guy and they score. It happens.“Guys who play a lot of minutes, especially, are bound to make mistakes. Does everyone deserve to be criticized fairly if you’re not playing well? Of course. That’s the job. But he’s playing really well now. He’s been solid. He hasn’t been making those big mistakes. He’s played simple and hard, and he looks like himself again.”
 
He's genuinely good for 97% of his minutes. It's just that 3% is mistakes that are so egregious and mind-boggling you wonder if he's even sentient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: domi28
i get that portzline has deadlines to hit and whatnot but i really don't think that severson being serviceable for 16 minutes a night is the triumph that it's being framed as, seeing as his contract carries 20+ min/gp expectations.
I'm going to go back to the NJD comparable here.

NJ's d is talented enough that they can roll 3 pairs close to 20 minutes. Severson's last year was essentially spent float between 2-3 pairing and still averaged 20 minute a night. Tied with Ryan Graves for the 4th highest ice time on the team. He earned his contract based on that roll even though Jarmo wanted him to be the top pairing guy. In the long run as the cap raises the length of it is more concerning than the dollar amount right now.

I don't care what a guy guys paid as long as he does his job. Hs salary will not be a problem for a while because Mateychuk has 2 more years after this on his ELC and Gudbranson's contract is up next season regardless of what happens with Provorov.
 
He's genuinely good for 97% of his minutes. It's just that 3% is mistakes that are so egregious and mind-boggling you wonder if he's even sentient.

Says the people who haven’t made a single breakout pass in their entire lives.

There’s plenty of these situations where he isn’t even actually the primary at fault CBJ player, yet, some people around here act as if he’s the only player responsible for the goal or chance against.

I also question the consistency behind people’s opinions on players making aggressive plays or worrying about making mistakes. It seems Severson isn’t treated or looked at in the same way as many others.

He should be considered a “top 4 defenseman”, more so than a “bottom pairing defenseman”, IMO. I’d still have him with Werenski or Mateychuk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TingleBiscuit
Says the people who haven’t made a single breakout pass in their entire lives.

There’s plenty of these situations where he isn’t even actually the primary at fault CBJ player, yet, some people around here act as if he’s the only player responsible for the goal or chance against.

I also question the consistency behind people’s opinions on players making aggressive plays or worrying about making mistakes. It seems Severson isn’t treated or looked at in the same way as many others.

He should be considered a “top 4 defenseman”, more so than a “bottom pairing defenseman”, IMO. I’d still have him with Werenski or Mateychuk.
The whole "you haven't done this" argument is always pretty faulty. These people also aren't paid 6.25mil a year. At the end of the day he was going through a patch where his games risk vs reward got out of sync, the coach noticed it too, benched the player and now he looks better.

I never would have taken him away from Christiansen to begin with. People get so hung up on what label a pairing is but that pair was getting great results together but somewhere along the way Evason for whatever reason started to lose trust in those 2. The whole D shuffle along with trying to pretend Sillinger can hang on an offensive line are 2 of the stranger things Evason has done
 
Says the people who haven’t made a single breakout pass in their entire lives.
well, severson isn't being compared to message board posters. he's being compared to other $6m+ defensemen. guys in that echelon tend to take better care of the puck than severson does. it is what it is.

He should be considered a “top 4 defenseman”, more so than a “bottom pairing defenseman”, IMO. I’d still have him with Werenski or Mateychuk.
i don't dislike the player at all and i agree that he should be viewed as a top-four defenseman. but i don't love that the cap resources the franchise has dedicated to him (#3 defenseman level pay) are aligned to a role where he isn't quite as efficient (top pairing-ish) as he has been lower in the lineup.

his rush defense is a bit of an issue and imo is what prevents the team from giving him a long look with werenski and mateychuk – two guys who love to get up in the play and be active. severson certainly has louder tools than fabbro, but the quieteness/stability of fabbro's game makes him a great partner for werenski imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alphafox

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad