East Coast Icestyle
Registered User
It's like you didn't read what I posted. I'm an "advanced stats" guys, but even then I don't like HeroCharts because they leave out all context. Without context advanced stats are absolutely useless. Hamilton was phenomenal in his final year in Boston he ate up tough minutes, murdered his possession stats and was still able to produce at a high clip. Last season he shifted from playing harder minutes to playing relatively easy minutes (Brodie and Giordano ate the hard minutes up) despite that Hamilton still bled goals against, his possession numbers dropped and his production dropped. I said he was relatively bad, meaning he was bad compared to his previous seasons. I think Hamilton at this point is a 2/3 with 1B potential, but to suggest he wasn't underwhelming relative to previous seasons is just wrong.
It's like you simply have no understanding of how different the two situations are. On Boston, he paired with Chara, a defensive beast in a defensive system that no doubt would help out with advanced stats, which you say you are all for.
On Calgary he was relied upon to carry his own pairing for the first time, on a team that had no defencive system!! We bled goals because our coach can motivate, but can't adapt, create systems, or piece together adequate lines/pairs, (wow what a sideways move we did with coaching this year...) and had two goalies that couldn't stop a damn beach ball on top of that.
As for harder minutes, it's not insanely different on the second pairing as a 3 than on the first pairing as a 2. Our coach figured he wouldn't get as much special teams time as freakin Engelland and Wideman. If he had the pp time of Wideman, he would have hit 50+ and other fans wouldn't even try to bash him. (Never mind, as a Karlsson fan I know that's wrong).
'Relative' to past situations, And including a decidedly crappy start, I'd say Hamilton did pretty damn good.