robbieboy3686
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2016
- 3,959
- 2,709
Ducks fan here. I love cozens. Would the sabres trade him for 1st 2025( lottery protected turns into unprotected 1st 26 ) +zellwegger/helleson+ sam colagenlo. Maybe sabres have to add a 3rd
I'd rather Mactavish tbhIt probably starts with Zegras
Ducks fan here. I love cozens. Would the sabres trade him for 1st 2025( lottery protected turns into unprotected 1st 26 ) +zellwegger/helleson+ sam colagenlo. Maybe sabres have to add a 3rd
As a team, the Sabres do not need to get any younger....even on the back end.Fair enough, what if we made the first round pick this year unprotected ?just saw some rumors about you guys maybe shopping power? Thought that a young dman going back could’ve been interesting.
Eh, we need to get veterans that know how to win, and not get younger.Ducks fan here. I love cozens. Would the sabres trade him for 1st 2025( lottery protected turns into unprotected 1st 26 ) +zellwegger/helleson+ sam colagenlo. Maybe sabres have to add a 3rd
Well now hold on skeeter ...No. No we would not.
First of all I think it's easier said than done, and secondly not with our GM who loves his first round picks too much and doesn't trade them even when we had three. Hellesson could be interesting, but I'd like to get McTavish or Zegras return in a deal like this. McTavish/Zegras + Helleson for Cozens+ maybe for me.Well now hold on skeeter ...
I'd take the first, Helleson and Luneau/Gaucher. That first can be moved for a nice piece to help today, Helleson would be a fun partner for Power and Luneau/Gaucher would be a nice get to shore up the backend or a defensive, physical, net front center
Why would a rebuilding GM trade one of his three first round picks, that is his lifeline in a rebuild.First of all I think it's easier said than done, and secondly not with our GM who loves his first round picks too much and doesn't trade them even when we had three. Hellesson could be interesting, but I'd like to get McTavish or Zegras return in a deal like this. McTavish/Zegras + Helleson for Cozens+ maybe for me.
I don't know, but he kept saying he was willing to consider a trade first, every year. Unfortunately, Adams is incapable of anything worthwhile. In any case, I am not interested in a futures deal, only if it's not a big overpayment.Why would a rebuilding GM trade one of his three first round picks, that is his lifeline in a rebuild.
I think Anaheim's unprotected first would probably the Sabres best trade asset, and if not the best, certainly the least complicated to move. Subtract Cozens' cap hit and that's a deal I would jump one in the very improbable world where Anaheim would entertain such a trade.As a team, the Sabres do not need to get any younger....even on the back end.
We are talking about buying out contracts of guys you could still easily move with the cap about to skyrocket to save capspace the rat bastard who owns us has no intention of ever using anyways.Buffalo has to stop being in the business of bleeding proven talent.
Buffalo has a year before Cozens buyout goes from 1/3rd to 2/3rds
McTavish is probably the only thing that interests me on the Ducks roster, off the top of my head.