Ghetty Green
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2018
- 1,533
- 1,760
That's all fine dandy, but hows his gap control ?Is that good? 10 points in 2 games?
That's all fine dandy, but hows his gap control ?Is that good? 10 points in 2 games?
Unless LA wants to keep playing rhd on the left that log jam needs to be dealt with.He had a lot of confidence going into this year. You should've seen him in Kings training camp. It seemed to evaporate once Blake and McLellan started jerking him around, though. I don't have a lot of faith that those two won't find a way to do it again (though the circumstances will be different, obviously). I expect him to look NHL ready in the Fall, but spend most of the season in the AHL, anyways, because Blake won't want to lose Sean Walker or some other silly reason.
If anything, you’re likely to see Brandt on the LH as he pretty ambidextrous for a young Dman and much more so than Durzi..Unless LA wants to keep playing rhd on the left that log jam needs to be dealt with.
I can see Clarke making the team with a solid camp. Durzi staying on the left. Then it comes down to Walker and Spence.
Trade Walker if you can and I guess Spence gets to be 7th d.
Bjornfot is really the guy who needs to solidify a spot. Especially if Gavrikov isn't resigned.
Maybe soIf anything, you’re likely to see Brandt on the LH as he pretty ambidextrous for a young Dman and much more so than Durzi..
Sometimes high end scorers, especially Dmen, who go back to junior after a NHL stint are told to work on their D, and not worry about points.Clarke obviously didn’t get the memo.
Really, cause he sure isn’t known as a defensive player. Some LA fans seem to gush about all of their prospects, thinking that they walk on water(i.e. Turcotte). If you think that Clarke is a defense first Dman you don’t have a clue about hockey.He wasn't sent back to work on his game like many others. He was sent back b/c of the logjam in LA.
In his stint in the NHL he wasn't a defensive liability, even playing on his opposite side.
Maybe you didn't get the memo
Really, cause he sure isn’t known as a defensive player. Some LA fans seem to gush about all of their prospects, thinking that they walk on water(i.e. Turcotte). If you think that Clarke is a defense first Dman you don’t have a clue about hockey.
“He wasn’t a defensive liability” =\= “he is a defensive d man”Really, cause he sure isn’t known as a defensive player. Some LA fans seem to gush about all of their prospects, thinking that they walk on water(i.e. Turcotte). If you think that Clarke is a defense first Dman you don’t have a clue about hockey.
“Hey coach I’m gonna stop scoring so we can play some hockey in our end”Sometimes high end scorers, especially Dmen, who go back to junior after a NHL stint are told to work on their D, and not worry about points.Clarke obviously didn’t get the memo.
Really, cause he sure isn’t known as a defensive player. Some LA fans seem to gush about all of their prospects, thinking that they walk on water(i.e. Turcotte). If you think that Clarke is a defense first Dman you don’t have a clue about hockey.
Really, cause he sure isn’t known as a defensive player. Some LA fans seem to gush about all of their prospects, thinking that they walk on water(i.e. Turcotte). If you think that Clarke is a defense first Dman you don’t have a clue about hockey.
He might have been told to work on defending. They wouldn't saying anything about offense though. That might just drop if a player is trying to be more defensively responsible.Lmao. Nobody said that, and I'm sure nobody wants him to be.
You're in your own world here.
Ptetty sure the Kings org isn't sending him "memos" to slow his current rate of production to play more defense
Memo:" Hey Brandt. We're currently very upset with you dominating and helping your team win lots of games. Please stop embarrassing the LA Kings organization" signed Bozo the Clown
Lets just call Clarke what he isThis sure sounds objective and reasonable and based on things people definitely said and not at all some latent grumpiness about some weird past disagreement.
Lets just call Clarke what he is
The Zegras of defensemen
Cocky and highly skilled... going to bring a lot of fans and a lot of haters.
Clarke goes back and immediately makes his team a contender by being a dynamic force on the ice and this is the post you come up with.Sometimes high end scorers, especially Dmen, who go back to junior after a NHL stint are told to work on their D, and not worry about points.Clarke obviously didn’t get the memo.
Will his skatimg an issue at all I’m the NHL or was that over-blown that his odd skating stride would limit his game? It will be very cool to watch who will become the best D to come out of that draft. Plenty of good ones to watch !
From my angle, it looked like he was subtly making that gesture during a tv timeout when facing the crowd (right after he taunted the fans after he scored). It was a very subtle gesture that lasted around 5 seconds and it seems that no one has tweeted about it, so there is a possibility that I misunderstood the hand movement. It was just very odd...I saw a post on the Dallas forums that Clarke was jerking off towards the crowd? Lmfao
Surprised I don't see anything in here with more details.
I see it being a strength, not a weakness. His skating is a little unconventional - adopts a super wide stance more often than most players, and lets his ankles flex/collapse more than you usually see. However, different isn’t necessarily bad - he’s got amazing edgework, super fluid on all his turns and transitions, just really great agility in general. Not gonna wow you with his straight line speed, but it’s also not an issue, it’s fine.Will his skatimg an issue at all I’m the NHL or was that over-blown that his odd skating stride would limit his game? It will be very cool to watch who will become the best D to come out of that draft. Plenty of good ones to watch !