Toggle sidebar

D Brandt Clarke - (2021, 8th, LAK)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Dan Patrick said:
Did I miss the announcement that the OHL season is starting up again? Very curious to see how he'll look back in Barrie after playing against competition that is much older than him for the past few months.
Click to expand...
The club says they've been asked by Hockey Canada to release him, since he should play at the U18 World Championship. That's the official explanation for now. More info coming up tomorrow, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan Patrick
Why so little talk about this guy?
Anybody that's watched him play considers him a top 15 player (some may say top 10, or even top 5), so why so little discussion?

Am I crazy in thinking that this kid could be a real impact player if he puts on some muscle and continues to work on his defensive play?
Vancouver's looking for a RH partner for Q. Hughes, could Clarke improve his D-game to be that guy?

Really doesn't sound that different than Cale Makar did in his draft year... good hands, good shot, smart player on both ends of the ice, and just needs to fill out a little bit.

Kinda reminds me of Victor Soderstrom, very good offensively and better defensively than most people give him credit for. Similar size too.
 
nergish said:
Why so little talk about this guy?
Anybody that's watched him play considers him a top 15 player (some may say top 10, or even top 5), so why so little discussion?

Am I crazy in thinking that this kid could be a real impact player if he puts on some muscle and continues to work on his defensive play?
Vancouver's looking for a RH partner for Q. Hughes, could Clarke improve his D-game to be that guy?

Really doesn't sound that different than Cale Makar did in his draft year... good hands, good shot, smart player on both ends of the ice, and just needs to fill out a little bit.

Kinda reminds me of Victor Soderstrom, very good offensively and better defensively than most people give him credit for. Similar size too.
Click to expand...
I would take him first without hesitation, myself. I see a bigger, even more talented Drysdale. His defense is very underrated, which I guess is understandable given how talented he is with the puck.

I will add that while I see where people are coming from when they criticize his skating style, I have always felt Clarke’s biggest strength was his skating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Learntoread and slumpy43
nergish said:
Why so little talk about this guy?
Anybody that's watched him play considers him a top 15 player (some may say top 10, or even top 5), so why so little discussion?

Am I crazy in thinking that this kid could be a real impact player if he puts on some muscle and continues to work on his defensive play?
Vancouver's looking for a RH partner for Q. Hughes, could Clarke improve his D-game to be that guy?

Really doesn't sound that different than Cale Makar did in his draft year... good hands, good shot, smart player on both ends of the ice, and just needs to fill out a little bit.

Kinda reminds me of Victor Soderstrom, very good offensively and better defensively than most people give him credit for. Similar size too.
Click to expand...

pretty much every publication has him as a top 5 pick.
 
nergish said:
Why so little talk about this guy?
Anybody that's watched him play considers him a top 15 player (some may say top 10, or even top 5), so why so little discussion?

Am I crazy in thinking that this kid could be a real impact player if he puts on some muscle and continues to work on his defensive play?
Vancouver's looking for a RH partner for Q. Hughes, could Clarke improve his D-game to be that guy?

Really doesn't sound that different than Cale Makar did in his draft year... good hands, good shot, smart player on both ends of the ice, and just needs to fill out a little bit.

Kinda reminds me of Victor Soderstrom, very good offensively and better defensively than most people give him credit for. Similar size too.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't pair him with Hughes, as you won't get the most out of either player. Although they are different players, both like to push the play and take chances offensively. I'd rather see Hughes with a prime-Hamhuis/Vlasic/Hjalmarsson/Tanev-type who can be a stabilizing presence. Parayko would be the modern dream.

Now, having two defenseman on the Canucks who can drive play from the backend like Hughes and Clarke would be a luxury any team would like. But they both need the right partner (Hughes more so than Clarke).

nergish said:
Yeah, I meant why so little discussion here?
He seems like the kind of prospect who's page should be updated daily!
Click to expand...
If it means other teams overlook him and he falls to the Canucks, I'm plenty okay with that.
 
nergish said:
Yeah, I meant why so little discussion here?
He seems like the kind of prospect who's page should be updated daily!
Click to expand...

“OnHockey” & “HockeyTV” had a ton of blackouts in extraliiga for the games. Just a ton of blackouts in general.

It's like somebody above me mentioned. It’s a smaller league, and has been extremely to view.
 
Last edited:
nowhereman said:
I wouldn't pair him with Hughes, as you won't get the most out of either player. Although they are different players, both like to push the play and take chances offensively. I'd rather see Hughes with a prime-Hamhuis/Vlasic/Hjalmarsson/Tanev-type who can be a stabilizing presence. Parayko would be the mode
Click to expand...
 
nowhereman said:
I wouldn't pair him with Hughes, as you won't get the most out of either player. Although they are different players, both like to push the play and take chances offensively. I'd rather see Hughes with a prime-Hamhuis/Vlasic/Hjalmarsson/Tanev-type who can be a stabilizing presence. Parayko would be the modern dream.

Now, having two defenseman on the Canucks who can drive play from the backend like Hughes and Clarke would be a luxury any team would like. But they both need the right partner (Hughes more so than Clarke).


If it means other teams overlook him and he falls to the Canucks, I'm plenty okay with that.
Click to expand...
maybe Canucks don't need other teams to overlook him now?
If Im a betting man, I would still value Power over Clarke. The lack of games makes me favor Power's undeniable physical tools over Clarke's finesse. Power in Michigan is more impressive than Clarke in Slovakia. I cannot see Clarke drop lower than 4th right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom