GDT: Czechs vs Sweden, semi final, 9am EST

[toddkaz]

P
You do realize that you wouldn’t be watching Czechia in the semi-finals at all if it wasn’t for him?

Also, man up.

So you are deflecting? Typical.

 

[bottomofthefoodchain]

No. Amaericans hav 2 or 3 better d.


Yes. What is the point of a tall goaltender if he can't cover the entire bottom of the net.

Did a swede steal your candy or something holy moly

 

[OKR]

So you are deflecting? Typical.

Do you even know what either of those words mean? Because neither make zero sense in this context lmao

 

[EK47]

Apparently he has not been on ice for a goal against and is +11 in this tournament

Truly impressive, he did cause the penalty that led to Czechia tying the game though. But a minor is a minor even if it leads to a goal or not.

 

[Janvonpobben]

Nobody going to talk about the impressive attendence for this tournament? Shows that it doesnt need to be in Canada all the time

 

[karhukissa]

Final and home soil, there's nothing better. Congrats Sverige!

 

[toddkaz]

Do you even know what either of those words mean? Because neither make zero sense in this context lmao

Yes, we were talking about points and then you deflected to the teams achievements in the tournament.

That was never the topic but you deflected there didn't you?

You also made a hypothetical statement that is impossible to prove.

Can you prove the statement you made?

Just take the L.

 

[Janvonpobben]

Final and home soil, there's nothing better. Congrats Sverige!

Lots of ref whining in this thread though. I remember wjc 2018 final when canads fot 6 PP and sweden 1. But apparently it was no problem about that.

 

[karhukissa]

Lots of ref whining in this thread though. I remember wjc 2018 final when canads fot 6 PP and sweden 1. But apparently it was no problem about that.

Canada out so they got nothing else to do

 

[OKR]

Yes, we were talking about points and then you deflected to the teams achievements in the tournament.

That was never the topic but you deflected there didn't you?

You also made a hypothetical statement that is impossible to prove.

Just take the L.

The post that started it all:
” Kulich and Šalé non existent for the whole tournament. Major dissapointment!”

As you should be able to see: the topic was constantly the tournament as whole, not just points. Also you still didn’t explain why on earth you used the word ”typical” in a context where it makes zero sense lol

What a delusional post from you, now that’s typical.

 

[toddkaz]

The post that started it all:
” Kulich and Šalé non existent for the whole tournament. Major dissapointment!”

As you should be able to see: the topic was constantly the tournament as whole, not just points. Also you still didn’t explain why on earth you used the word ”typical” in a context where it makes zero sense lol

What a delusional post from you, now that’s typical.

You made a claim that Czechs wouldn't have made it to the semis without Kulich.

Can you back that claim up or not?

Then you are throwing insults around.

Kulich didn't even show up today.

Just take the L bro.

 

[OKR]

You made a claim that Czechs wouldn't have made it to the semis without Kulich.

Can you back that claim up or not?

Just take the L bro.

Aight, i’ll take the L just because i’m starting to feel sad for you and you clearly haven’t had W in your life.

 

[toddkaz]

Aight, i’ll take the L just because i’m starting to feel sad for you and you clearly haven’t had W in your life.

No worries bro.

How did Kulich do today?

 

[OKR]

No worries bro.

How did Kulich do today?

About as well as you do with arguing.

 

[1440]

Yup, Sweden's best D without a doubt.

Probably the best D in the tournament, but despite the points-totals difference, it is a toss-up between he and Willander, who has been the space/turnover-creating force that has allowed Lindstein to put up his points. They have played almost every minute of the tournament together and it has been hard to credit one over the other as the reason for their success. Their results are especially impressive given that they are playing on PK1 and not at all on the PP. Both have been really good and they have complimented each-other well. Having watched lots of Willander in the NCAA, it is the same story there. He pairs really well with offensive defensemen because he ties forwards up and opens up lots of space for them both on the breakout and in the offensive zone.

I have also liked Seamus Casey's game, but have not followed the USA closely enough to say he has been better than either of the Swedes.

 

[sting101]

No worries bro.

How did Kulich do today?

Kulich wasn't that noticeable after the first but how were his line mates and how many PPs did he get to unleash that shot.

Looks like a steady dose of Lindstein and Willander with a cognizant effort to play safe when his line was on the ice didn't leave him or that line with many opportunities.

Not his best game but his line mates did little to help him get quality shots. Still had 5

 

[toddkaz]

About as well as you do with arguing.

But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL

 

[OKR]

But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL

None of your posts make any sense, i’d love to talk more but you got to learn how to be more articulate.

 

[toddkaz]

None of your posts make any sense, i’d love to talk more but you got to learn how to be more articulate.

I see, so English isn't my native language. That makes you a bigot.

Also if none of my posts made sense how did you know what to say in your responses.

Bizarre to say the least.

 

[OKR]

I see, so English isn't my native language. That makes you a bigot.

Also if none of my posts made sense how did you know what to say in your responses.

Bizarre to say the least.

Why do you insist on using words you clearly don’t understand?

 

[toddkaz]

Why do you insist on using words you clearly don’t understand?

You keep responding. How the heck do you figure out what to say if my sentences are incoherent?

Perhaps a higher education will make my sentences more coherent?

Just a thought.

 

[EK47]

The fact that Hävelid had Norén, Johansson and Hävelid ahead of Lindstein ahead of this tournament boggles my mind. If he has a half decent game tomorrow he’s making the all WJC 5.

 

[OKR]

You keep responding. How the heck do you figure out what to say if my sentences are incoherent?

Perhaps a higher education will make my sentences more coherent?

Just a thought.

Because my responses are asking you to be more articulate because none of this makes any sense:
”But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL”

You used both ”deflection” and ”typical” in a context where it made zero sense, not to mention the fact you used the word ”bigot” wrong too.

Perhaps a higher education would make you not do so?

Just a thought

 

[Warh1ppy]

If I am Vancouver I am asking St Louis what they want for Lindstein because that pairing with Willander is/was absolute money

 

[helax]

Because my responses are asking you to be more articulate because none of this makes any sense:
”But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL”

You used both ”deflection” and ”typical” in a context where it made zero sense, not to mention the fact you used the word ”bigot” wrong too.

Perhaps a higher education would make you not do so?

Just a thought

Can you two please continue in DMs?

Good game, I hope the mental knot has some what untangled it selves now, first period looked shaky.