Toggle sidebar

GDT: Czechs vs Sweden, semi final, 9am EST

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Billy Kvcmu said:
Apparently he has not been on ice for a goal against and is +11 in this tournament
Click to expand...
Truly impressive, he did cause the penalty that led to Czechia tying the game though. But a minor is a minor even if it leads to a goal or not.
 
Nobody going to talk about the impressive attendence for this tournament? Shows that it doesnt need to be in Canada all the time
 
OKR said:
Do you even know what either of those words mean? Because neither make zero sense in this context lmao
Click to expand...
Yes, we were talking about points and then you deflected to the teams achievements in the tournament.

That was never the topic but you deflected there didn't you?

You also made a hypothetical statement that is impossible to prove.

Can you prove the statement you made?

Just take the L.
 
toddkaz said:
Yes, we were talking about points and then you deflected to the teams achievements in the tournament.

That was never the topic but you deflected there didn't you?

You also made a hypothetical statement that is impossible to prove.

Just take the L.
Click to expand...
The post that started it all:
” Kulich and Šalé non existent for the whole tournament. Major dissapointment!”

As you should be able to see: the topic was constantly the tournament as whole, not just points. Also you still didn’t explain why on earth you used the word ”typical” in a context where it makes zero sense lol

What a delusional post from you, now that’s typical.
 
OKR said:
The post that started it all:
” Kulich and Šalé non existent for the whole tournament. Major dissapointment!”

As you should be able to see: the topic was constantly the tournament as whole, not just points. Also you still didn’t explain why on earth you used the word ”typical” in a context where it makes zero sense lol

What a delusional post from you, now that’s typical.
Click to expand...
You made a claim that Czechs wouldn't have made it to the semis without Kulich.

Can you back that claim up or not?

Then you are throwing insults around.

Kulich didn't even show up today.

Just take the L bro.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OKR
toddkaz said:
You made a claim that Czechs wouldn't have made it to the semis without Kulich.

Can you back that claim up or not?

Just take the L bro.
Click to expand...
:facepalm:

Aight, i’ll take the L just because i’m starting to feel sad for you and you clearly haven’t had W in your life.
 
Buck Naked said:
Yup, Sweden's best D without a doubt.
Click to expand...
Probably the best D in the tournament, but despite the points-totals difference, it is a toss-up between he and Willander, who has been the space/turnover-creating force that has allowed Lindstein to put up his points. They have played almost every minute of the tournament together and it has been hard to credit one over the other as the reason for their success. Their results are especially impressive given that they are playing on PK1 and not at all on the PP. Both have been really good and they have complimented each-other well. Having watched lots of Willander in the NCAA, it is the same story there. He pairs really well with offensive defensemen because he ties forwards up and opens up lots of space for them both on the breakout and in the offensive zone.

I have also liked Seamus Casey's game, but have not followed the USA closely enough to say he has been better than either of the Swedes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane and Grub
toddkaz said:
No worries bro.

How did Kulich do today?
Click to expand...
Kulich wasn't that noticeable after the first but how were his line mates and how many PPs did he get to unleash that shot.

Looks like a steady dose of Lindstein and Willander with a cognizant effort to play safe when his line was on the ice didn't leave him or that line with many opportunities.

Not his best game but his line mates did little to help him get quality shots. Still had 5
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pieck and Czechboy
OKR said:
None of your posts make any sense, i’d love to talk more but you got to learn how to be more articulate.
Click to expand...
I see, so English isn't my native language. That makes you a bigot.

Also if none of my posts made sense how did you know what to say in your responses.

Bizarre to say the least.
 
toddkaz said:
I see, so English isn't my native language. That makes you a bigot.

Also if none of my posts made sense how did you know what to say in your responses.

Bizarre to say the least.
Click to expand...
Why do you insist on using words you clearly don’t understand?
 
OKR said:
Why do you insist on using words you clearly don’t understand?
Click to expand...
You keep responding. How the heck do you figure out what to say if my sentences are incoherent?

Perhaps a higher education will make my sentences more coherent?

Just a thought. :)
 
The fact that Hävelid had Norén, Johansson and Hävelid ahead of Lindstein ahead of this tournament boggles my mind. If he has a half decent game tomorrow he’s making the all WJC 5.
 
toddkaz said:
You keep responding. How the heck do you figure out what to say if my sentences are incoherent?

Perhaps a higher education will make my sentences more coherent?

Just a thought. :)
Click to expand...
Because my responses are asking you to be more articulate because none of this makes any sense:
”But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL”

You used both ”deflection” and ”typical” in a context where it made zero sense, not to mention the fact you used the word ”bigot” wrong too.

Perhaps a higher education would make you not do so?

Just a thought :)
 
If I am Vancouver I am asking St Louis what they want for Lindstein because that pairing with Willander is/was absolute money
 
OKR said:
Because my responses are asking you to be more articulate because none of this makes any sense:
”But like you said he showed up? Hmm...Ya, I am bad at this. LOL”

You used both ”deflection” and ”typical” in a context where it made zero sense, not to mention the fact you used the word ”bigot” wrong too.

Perhaps a higher education would make you not do so?

Just a thought :)
Click to expand...


Can you two please continue in DMs?

Good game, I hope the mental knot has some what untangled it selves now, first period looked shaky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom