Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,110
- 13,503
Why are you making me look up big words?LOL. Good riddance.
Arizona needs a clean slate with a solid owner. The long string of frauds and carpetbaggers has been toxic
I realize that Craig Morgan is a real supporter of Arizona and its market, but his indefatigable credulity for all of the phony ownership groups and schemes has been remarkable.
This makes it seem like his intention all along for the land was to win the auction and then sit on the land, claiming any development was delayed because Phoenix isn't giving him the necessary approvals.
So it's truly over unless there is a new owner willing to spend probably 3 billion total on expansion fee + building a new arena + everything that goes into launching the franchise?
That person may exist, to be clear. But it's going to take one hell of a rich person who is ready to take a big risk.
What are the recent "new" cities? If you're talking only NHL even though you mentioned "big 4" the most recent sunbelt team is Vegas most recent after that would be Nashville and they've been around for about 25 years, the California teams have been around for 30+, LA almost 60, FLA teams 30+, Carolina and Dallas were relocations that happened around the same time as Phoenix at ~30 years.Of the recent "new" cities to get one though? First since Atlanta over 10 years ago.
Phoenix, Atlanta. Those that got the NHL after during or after the 1990s expansion. Phoenix was the second to lose one after Atlanta. It's a bad look for Phoenix in general as a sports town is what I'm saying.What are the recent "new" cities? If you're talking only NHL even though you mentioned "big 4" the most recent sunbelt team is Vegas most recent after that would be Nashville and they've been around for about 25 years, the California teams have been around for 30+, LA almost 60, FLA teams 30+, Carolina and Dallas were relocations that happened around the same time as Phoenix at ~30 years.
I think Toronto gets an NFL team before any of this Aqib. Thats probably a better chance of making money more than either hockey team. Hockey's model for business is a broken one, a thing people around here and the league ignore. Being a gate-driven league in 2024 is nonsense imo.Its funny that people tell me that no one will pay that for a second team in Southern Ontario but some of the same people think someone will pay that for a team in Arizona
Because nobody wants to own the team way out in Glendale.Disagree....In 30 years, not one viable ownership group stepped up when the cost was less than $300M with a team friendly lease in place. If Glendale isn't in play(which it should be), the cost is going to be close to $3B for the team & an arena. Add in that the market itself & lack of of a stable fanbase is still an issue, as is getting a new building built in the political landscape that is AZ. Can't see a team back there within a decade.
Other than Vegas none of the sunbelt teams are recent or new. Relocations happen in NA pro sports and it's usually not the fault of the city or fans but greedy entitled billionaire owners.Phoenix, Atlanta. Those that got the NHL after during or after the 1990s expansion. Phoenix was the second to lose one after Atlanta. It's a bad look for Phoenix in general as a sports town is what I'm saying.
Fair enough.Other than Vegas none of the sunbelt teams are recent or new. Relocations happen in NA pro sports and it's usually not the fault of the city or fans but greedy entitled billionaire owners.
Glendale is 25 minutes from downtown! At some point need to wake up and realize that was the only option to keep the Coyotes until another arena was built.Because nobody wants to own the team way out in Glendale.
We’ll all be long dead and gone before Toronto gets an NFL teamPhoenix, Atlanta. Those that got the NHL after during or after the 1990s expansion. Phoenix was the second to lose one after Atlanta. It's a bad look for Phoenix in general as a sports town is what I'm saying.
I think Toronto gets an NFL team before any of this Aqib. Thats probably a better chance of making money more than either hockey team. Hockey's model for business is a broken one, a thing people around here and the league ignore. Being a gate-driven league in 2024 is nonsense imo.
I'm willing to bet there's a lot more there than we know. It was true of Atlanta, when these questions came up.But, realistically, who would come in now and pay full Bettman price for an expansion franchise, when at any time in the last 20+ years they could have bought the team for pennies on the dollar or at least hundreds of millions less than the price going forward?
If I've read everything correctly, the Jets 1.0/Coyotes history remains with the league until someone comes in and buys a franchise for Phoenix. So... not necessarily "homeless", but certainly not tied to any other organization.So if i understood correctly, Utah is a brand new team, and the coyotes/jets1.0 history stayed with the franchise. So that history is now "homeless"?
Exactly. All Utah got was the people and their contracts.So if i understood correctly, Utah is a brand new team, and the coyotes/jets1.0 history stayed with the franchise. So that history is now "homeless"?
But, realistically, who would come in now and pay full Bettman price for an expansion franchise, when at any time in the last 20+ years they could have bought the team for pennies on the dollar or at least hundreds of millions less than the price going forward?