FLAMESFAN
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 5,415
- 1,331
The Flames rebuild was so good, it only lasted a couple months!
True, albeit comparing it to the Sabres who havent even made the playoffs lol.Other than 2010 they were truly competitive in 2020 and then Covid happened.
Giroux was incredible, my all time favorite flyer, but they failed miserably to build around him.
They've failed to make it out of the first round 11 of the last 12 years, and didn't make the playoffs 6 of the last 8, several of those years include Giroux
I dont disagree there. Re-signing Scheif and Helle was a minor miracle, but they havent even sniffed the definition of a "rebuild".They did not rebuild by finishing in the bottom 5 like most of the tank team. They pretty much stay in the middle. From the 2011 draft to the 2016 draft. They have successfully drafted a great player from Scheifele to Laine. They managed to stay a good team despise Winnipeg being in the ''no trade list'' of most of the NHL player list.
One of the best GM in the league.
They did draft 4 times in the top 10 from 2011 to 2016. What made Winnipeg rebuild successful is drafting impact player. They did not draft a single ''bust', from 2011-2016 in the first round. There 3 best forward all have been drafted.True, albeit comparing it to the Sabres who havent even made the playoffs lol.
I dont disagree there. Re-signing Scheif and Helle was a minor miracle, but they havent even sniffed the definition of a "rebuild".
The fortunes of Vancouver vs Detroit basically hinge on a single back to back draft selection:Canucks were putrid and never picked above 5, and made playoffs after 8 year's absence if you discount the fluke run in COVID. thats not a solid excuse. Good management makes a world of difference.
What I find interesting is that Grier has lost value wise on all of his major trades, but has done them at absolutely the right time which seems to have more than made up the difference.I like the job that Mike Grier has done, hated it for a while but really promising when you look at it longer term. Hughes has made some good asset management moves but I think Habs are kinda unlucky with injuries derailing careers and not getting high end talent with their high picks (Slaf is no mack, Reinbacher is no Makar, Demidov is a good winger on the tarasenko level). So they wont go anywhere after the rebuild imo. Chicago is too early to tell. Columbus is actually turning it around, I like their current rebuild but its also rebuild #2. Senators also on the edge of rebuild 2.
Outside of 2013 (which was 21st overall) they hit majorly on their 1st round picks with Reilly, Nylander, Marner and Matthews all acquired between 2012-2016. How many rebuilding teams are hitting 4 for 4 on top 10 picks? The problem wasn't that they didn't bottom out another season, the problem was not being able to draft well outside of top 10 picks and not being able to get any major steals in FA or trade.They found success too quickly after implementing Nylander, Marner, Matthews. If they bottomed out another 1-2 years they likely would have added a defender.
etc
2017 (Year after Matthews)
Miro Heiskanen (3rd overall)
Makar (4th overall)
2018
Dahlin (1st overall)
Hughes (7th overall)
Losing small tactical moves is not a big deal when you move in a consistent strategic direction.What I find interesting is that Grier has lost value wise on all of his major trades, but has done them at absolutely the right time which seems to have more than made up the difference.
Oilers look like crap--outside two playersTiming of rebuilds is the most important thing imo. Teams that were rebuilding ten years ago look good and did five years ago as well, teams rebuilding five years ago don’t look so good without overwhelming outlooks either. The big exception is Buffalo who messed up their last rebuild with bad asset management and that should have tanked harder in 2015-16 and 2016-17 rather than going half at it after fully bottoming out in 2014-15. So much is outside your control because you can’t control how impactful certain draft classes will be quickly.
Habs would be looking excellent had they taken Tkachuk, Michkov, Oettinger. Now that may have changed their positions but if it hadn’t, they’d be looking good with Tkachuk, Suzuki, Caufield, Michkov, Slaf, Laine. Plus other prospects
Timing of rebuilds is the most important thing imo. Teams that were rebuilding ten years ago look good and did five years ago as well, teams rebuilding five years ago don’t look so good without overwhelming outlooks either. The big exception is Buffalo who messed up their last rebuild with bad asset management and that should have tanked harder in 2015-16 and 2016-17 rather than going half at it after fully bottoming out in 2014-15. So much is outside your control because you can’t control how impactful certain draft classes will be quickly.
HuhWorst
That still isnt a "rebuild". That is simply drafting well with the spots they had. They still were trying to be competitive, just sucked enough to not make the playoffs, but not suck bad enough to get top picks or tank to get there on purpose. Even Laine, took a lottery win to get. Ironically Tkachuk was drafted 6th overall that year.They did draft 4 times in the top 10 from 2011 to 2016. What made Winnipeg rebuild successful is drafting impact player. They did not draft a single ''bust', from 2011-2016 in the first round. There 3 best forward all have been drafted.
What made team stay in the bottom is bad drafting. Look at every draft. You will always find 1 or 2 bust in the top 10.
Oh hell no…Ottawa 100%…after tonight’s disaster, cherry on top as the worst.Huh
Whose been ruined?! None of the current prospects are old enough to be ruined. And those that are old enough are in the NHL
Marchenko, Chinakov, Voronkov, Kent Johnson, Sillinger, Fantilli?
Not every player pops in their first or second year. Kent Johnson for example had pretty meh seasons up to this point and he currently looks like he might be a first line play driving core player.
Eh. Remember when Gaudreau dragged the team to playoffs and then next season they picked Tkachuk?Flames are going to be stuck in mediocrity forever. Zary and Coronato look like they will have solid careeers as top 6 guys. They have a lot of solid prospects. But, outside of maybe Zayne Parekh, no one trending toward elite.
The main issue is that they have Dustin Wolf who is going to steal wayyyy too many games and they will never bottom out.
Its amazing how getting the #1 pick and a chance to draft a generational player helps your rebuild. Detroit has been pretty unlucky in that regard. The Ducks as well. SJ and Chicago have had good draft luck. Put Bedard on the Ducks or Detroit and this entire thread has a different take.
I see Detroit turning more into Nashville 10-15 years ago. Couple of stud defensemen, good goaltending (one of Cossa/Augustine is bound to pan out if not both) but a whole lot of mediocrity on forwards. I don't see much difference between Larkin and someone like Legwand, 1st line centers sure but definitely not amongst the top of their respective eras. Sure it's possible that Yzerman builds the team better eventually, but far more likely it'll result in same sort of mediocrity.