What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerThats cause Gretzky didnt play in a 6 team league.... Finishing top 5 in a 6 team league means you were in the top 7% of forwards. Which would be the same as the top 27 forwards today.Howe pretty easy imo. Being a top 5 forward in the league for 20 years is unheard of. Even Gretzky didn’t do that.
Bad argument, when the 6 teams expanded a lot of the league was watered down and expansion teams were punching bags for good players for a good period of time. So that top 27 forwards comment is ridiculous.Thats cause Gretzky didnt play in a 6 team league.... Finishing top 5 in a 6 team league means you were in the top 7% of forwards. Which would be the same as the top 27 forwards today.
Except its not. Because if you have a subpar season the drop isnt as much. Dropping from an 82 point pace to a 70 point pace with 32 teams drops you significantly in ranking.Bad argument, when the 6 teams expanded a lot of the league was watered down and expansion teams were punching bags for good players for a good period of time. So that top 27 forwards comment is ridiculous.
Bad argument, when the 6 teams expanded a lot of the league was watered down and expansion teams were punching bags for good players for a good period of time. So that top 27 forwards comment is ridiculous.
Thats cause Gretzky didnt play in a 6 team league.... Finishing top 5 in a 6 team league means you were in the top 7% of forwards. Which would be the same as the top 27 forwards today.
a 6 team league meant you didnt have JAGs to beat up on either, it was 6 all star teams.
I also love the "it was so easy in the O6" argument when it comes up. Yeah? if it was so easy then how come no one else came close to doing it?
To add to that, here are (probably) the next four best forwards of the Original Six era:I also love the "it was so easy in the O6" argument when it comes up. Yeah? if it was so easy then how come no one else came close to doing it?
Thats cause Gretzky didnt play in a 6 team league.... Finishing top 5 in a 6 team league means you were in the top 7% of forwards. Which would be the same as the top 27 forwards today.
In 1968-69, Howe finished third in scoring. It was his 20th year in a row finishing top 5.
He was 41.
That equivalent season for Crosby is 2027-28.
The gap is massive.
Finishing top 5 in a 6 team league means you were in the top 7% of forwards. Which would be the same as the top 27 forwards today
Howe did that in a league playing against guys from Ontario and Quebec. Top 5 in Howe’s era is like top 26 or 27 now
Extremely impressive feat for Crosby, top-tier consistency. But absolutely not more impressive or hard than Howe's stat.A top 5 finish obviously looks more impressive, but Howe was competing against 108 Skaters, compared to Crosby who’s competing with 576(18*32). If we look at top liners who typically get top 5-10 finishes, Howe was competing against 30 compared to 160 skaters for Crosby.
Age (start of season) | Howe | Crosby |
18 | - | 3 |
19 | - | 1 |
20 | - | - |
21 | 3 | 1 |
22 | 1 | 1 |
23 | 1 | - |
24 | 1 | - |
25 | 1 | 3 |
26 | 5 | 1 |
27 | 2 | 3 |
28 | 1 | 2 |
29 | 4 | 2 |
30 | 4 | 5 |
31 | 5 | 2 |
32 | 5 | - |
33 | 3 | 6 |
34 | 1 | 9 |
35 | 5 | 6 |
36 | 3 | 3 |
37 | 5 | 5th (active) |
38 | 4 | |
39 | 3 | |
40 | 3 | |
41 | 9 |