Oh, there's very little question that Crawford has been the team's best and most valuable player this season.
Last season too.
And arguably 2016 as well, though Kane would probably be the popular choice given the Hart win.
Last season probably not. Overall he was a .918, which is just marginally better than "starter average". He wasn't as bad as some make him out to be, though.
2016 He was up there with Kane and Panarin. He should have been in the discussion since Kane+Panarin provided the scoring while Crawford was the goalie and defense.
This year? Riding a .932, 2nd overall among SV% leaders league wide. Let's go to the map:
Points? Kane is 25th.
Goals? Anisimov is 32nd.
Assists? Kane is 25th.
FO%? Toews is 17th.
+/-? Seabrook is 47th
For Real-time stats of players with 16 or more games played (more than half the season):
Hits? Toews is 119th.
Blocked Shots? Anisimov is 60th.
Giveaways? Anisimov is 117th.
S%? Anisimov is 12th.
The only stat that is comparable in terms of league position is Schmaltz second overall in takeaways.
Only someone taking hallucinogenic compounds rectally could say that Crawford so far has not been the team's MVP. I mean really: who else has been leading the team as well as being so high in league-wide stats?