For sure you pick the long shot every time you're bound to hit a couple. I'm just saying I doubt he's really building a concrete opinion on more than a few players. Like he's TSN's "head scout" but he probably spends, what, 6-8 hours a week watching or investigating prospects? I was just surprised to see him roll out three full rounds lolCraig seems to have historically been a guy who tries to make bold projections about how guys will adapt to the pro/NHL game. He's had guys significantly higher or lower based on his personal projections. Like everyone else, he gets a ton wrong, but you can go look at some of his rankings, and he got some of his bolder rankings right. He had Adrian Kempe at 10 and Brayden Point at 17 in 2014 for example.
He has said probably 300 times on podcasts and radio by now: "we thought Jarome would be just a 30 goal scorer, and we were wrong - am I gonna make the same mistake with Tij?" (more or less)Not saying this influenced him in any way but Button was the Director of Scouting for Dallas and was closely involved with Drafting Iginla in 1995
Craig is married to the game much more than the average fan would like to believe. The guy has worked long and hard to know as much about the game as possible. Sure, some of his reports may not be as well versed as you'd like because he has a ton of duties/responsibilities as a hockey expert at TSN, but I do think he's a bit more well versed about each draft talent pool than you're giving him credit for.For sure you pick the long shot every time you're bound to hit a couple. I'm just saying I doubt he's really building a concrete opinion on more than a few players. Like he's TSN's "head scout" but he probably spends, what, 6-8 hours a week watching or investigating prospects? I was just surprised to see him roll out three full rounds lol
But he's not dedicated to just that, he's working games for TSN and other duties. It just doesn't seem realistic that he can get that wide a bearing on so many prospects. Hell most amateur scouts would probably tell you they don't have a serious read on that many players.Craig is married to the game much more than the average fan would like to believe. The guy has worked long and hard to know as much about the game as possible. Sure, some of his reports may not be as well versed as you'd like because he has a ton of duties/responsibilities as a hockey expert at TSN, but I do think he's a bit more well versed about each draft talent pool than you're giving him credit for.
He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.Certainly interesting that Eiserman has suddenly climbed back up the rankings. I don't know if he'll go 5th. I don't know if Craig did it based on who is picking where. But, I never felt Eiserman deserved the drop to 15.
Definitely. At this stage I would never care too much what a players weaknesses are, I would focus on how truly standout their strengths are. And then of course how driven they are to improve.He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
I read somewhere that it’s coming today.Is Bob McKenzie just not even doing his final rankings this year? The draft is a week away what’s he waiting for?
Caufield had some of the same knocks. He's in the right situation and is rounding into a complete player. If Eiserman has any work ethic at all, I wouldn't have a problem taking him at 5.He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
and during that time he would be talking to hockey people.But he's not dedicated to just that, he's working games for TSN and other duties. It just doesn't seem realistic that he can get that wide a bearing on so many prospects. Hell most amateur scouts would probably tell you they don't have a serious read on that many players.
He's building suspense. He KNOWS the anticipation is killing you.Is Bob McKenzie just not even doing his final rankings this year? The draft is a week away what’s he waiting for?
Is Bob McKenzie just not even doing his final rankings this year? The draft is a week away what’s he waiting for?
So his rankings that are wildly out of line with all other scouting reports are from consensus among hockey people? Not sure that lines upand during that time he would be talking to hockey people.
If you're going to risk a 1st-round pick on a one-dimensional 18 year-old, pick a guy who can score.He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
Thanks for putting this out there for everyone. Unbelievable that any list that strays from the consensus is considered “bad”.This boards obsession with consensus rankings is hilarious.
Craig always provides one of the more authentic lists you'll see. Some posters here would have an aneurysm if they saw every single scouts individual lists like Craigs.
Why wait so long?
Normally it'd be done on Monday when the draft is on Friday. So this seems "usual." His 2019 rankings were released on June 17 (Monday) and the first round was June 21 (Friday). Then the pandemic years happened so that was different. Then ESPN experimented with having the first round on Thursday/Wednesday in 2022+2023. Bob released his rankings on the Thursday before the first round (Wednesday).
I found that interesting too. I recall Button gushing over Stiga at the U18s, talking about him making a push for the late 1st round/early 2nd round. So I expected Craig to have him in that range.I won't get into the weeds about where he has the the top guys ranked, but I wonder what he knows about Stiga that puts him at 64 in the ranking.
Why wait so long?
Closer to the draft the more information he can get on which team is targeting who.Why wait so long?
When we look back at these lists from all the various scouting services who has actually hit well? Reality of the draft is that all but a couple to a few of kids drafted will play in the nhl as a teenager. So lots of development ahead of them and a lot of that not with the nhl clubs as they return to the chl and euro leagues plus remain to go to the ncaa. Unlike in mlb which has multiple minor leagues that they get the player soon after their draft unless that player goes unsigned and returns to the draft the next year. The nhl clubs don’t control as much of the development as mlb does.Thanks for putting this out there for everyone. Unbelievable that any list that strays from the consensus is considered “bad”.
Like, Craig puts a list out that isn’t heavily influenced by other lists. Let’s just enjoy a different perspective instead of crucifying these independent thinkers.
This boards obsession with consensus rankings is hilarious.
Craig always provides one of the more authentic lists you'll see. Some posters here would have an aneurysm if they saw every single scouts individual lists like Craigs.