Craig Button releases his final Craig's List for the 2024 draft

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,132
5,502
Dartmouth, NS
Certainly interesting that Eiserman has suddenly climbed back up the rankings. I don't know if he'll go 5th. I don't know if Craig did it based on who is picking where. But, I never felt Eiserman deserved the drop to 15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Jared Dunn

Registered User
Dec 23, 2013
8,834
3,389
Yellowknife
Craig seems to have historically been a guy who tries to make bold projections about how guys will adapt to the pro/NHL game. He's had guys significantly higher or lower based on his personal projections. Like everyone else, he gets a ton wrong, but you can go look at some of his rankings, and he got some of his bolder rankings right. He had Adrian Kempe at 10 and Brayden Point at 17 in 2014 for example.
For sure you pick the long shot every time you're bound to hit a couple. I'm just saying I doubt he's really building a concrete opinion on more than a few players. Like he's TSN's "head scout" but he probably spends, what, 6-8 hours a week watching or investigating prospects? I was just surprised to see him roll out three full rounds lol

Not saying this influenced him in any way but Button was the Director of Scouting for Dallas and was closely involved with Drafting Iginla in 1995
He has said probably 300 times on podcasts and radio by now: "we thought Jarome would be just a 30 goal scorer, and we were wrong - am I gonna make the same mistake with Tij?" (more or less)
 

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,256
2,971
Central Ohio
For sure you pick the long shot every time you're bound to hit a couple. I'm just saying I doubt he's really building a concrete opinion on more than a few players. Like he's TSN's "head scout" but he probably spends, what, 6-8 hours a week watching or investigating prospects? I was just surprised to see him roll out three full rounds lol
Craig is married to the game much more than the average fan would like to believe. The guy has worked long and hard to know as much about the game as possible. Sure, some of his reports may not be as well versed as you'd like because he has a ton of duties/responsibilities as a hockey expert at TSN, but I do think he's a bit more well versed about each draft talent pool than you're giving him credit for.
 

Jared Dunn

Registered User
Dec 23, 2013
8,834
3,389
Yellowknife
Craig is married to the game much more than the average fan would like to believe. The guy has worked long and hard to know as much about the game as possible. Sure, some of his reports may not be as well versed as you'd like because he has a ton of duties/responsibilities as a hockey expert at TSN, but I do think he's a bit more well versed about each draft talent pool than you're giving him credit for.
But he's not dedicated to just that, he's working games for TSN and other duties. It just doesn't seem realistic that he can get that wide a bearing on so many prospects. Hell most amateur scouts would probably tell you they don't have a serious read on that many players.
 

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,461
11,660
Murica
Certainly interesting that Eiserman has suddenly climbed back up the rankings. I don't know if he'll go 5th. I don't know if Craig did it based on who is picking where. But, I never felt Eiserman deserved the drop to 15.
He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
 

docbenton

Registered User
Dec 6, 2014
1,848
670
He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
Definitely. At this stage I would never care too much what a players weaknesses are, I would focus on how truly standout their strengths are. And then of course how driven they are to improve.

Goal scorers don't miss because they don't play defense, they miss because they don't score goals.
 

Byron Bitz

Registered User
Apr 6, 2010
7,823
4,178
Is Bob McKenzie just not even doing his final rankings this year? The draft is a week away what’s he waiting for?
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,132
5,502
Dartmouth, NS
He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
Caufield had some of the same knocks. He's in the right situation and is rounding into a complete player. If Eiserman has any work ethic at all, I wouldn't have a problem taking him at 5.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,441
21,341
MN
But he's not dedicated to just that, he's working games for TSN and other duties. It just doesn't seem realistic that he can get that wide a bearing on so many prospects. Hell most amateur scouts would probably tell you they don't have a serious read on that many players.
and during that time he would be talking to hockey people.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,616
17,150
San Diego
Is Bob McKenzie just not even doing his final rankings this year? The draft is a week away what’s he waiting for?


Normally it'd be done on Monday when the draft is on Friday. So this seems "usual." His 2019 rankings were released on June 17 (Monday) and the first round was June 21 (Friday). Then the pandemic years happened so that was different. Then ESPN experimented with having the first round on Thursday/Wednesday in 2022+2023. Bob released his rankings on the Thursday before the first round (Wednesday).
 

Deep Blue Metallic

Bo knows hockey.
Mar 5, 2021
4,879
6,004
He's got a bankable skill. Even if you think the rest of his game is wanting, some team might take a chance on drafting him high in the hope they get a 30-40 goal scorer and can work out the kinks.
If you're going to risk a 1st-round pick on a one-dimensional 18 year-old, pick a guy who can score.

It's far easier teaching that guy to play a 200' game (assuming he's willing) than hoping to get offensive production at the ultimate level of the sport from a more well-rounded player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

User1996

Registered User
Jun 24, 2020
3,124
1,930
This boards obsession with consensus rankings is hilarious.

Craig always provides one of the more authentic lists you'll see. Some posters here would have an aneurysm if they saw every single scouts individual lists like Craigs.
Thanks for putting this out there for everyone. Unbelievable that any list that strays from the consensus is considered “bad”.

Like, Craig puts a list out that isn’t heavily influenced by other lists. Let’s just enjoy a different perspective instead of crucifying these independent thinkers.
 

Byron Bitz

Registered User
Apr 6, 2010
7,823
4,178

Normally it'd be done on Monday when the draft is on Friday. So this seems "usual." His 2019 rankings were released on June 17 (Monday) and the first round was June 21 (Friday). Then the pandemic years happened so that was different. Then ESPN experimented with having the first round on Thursday/Wednesday in 2022+2023. Bob released his rankings on the Thursday before the first round (Wednesday).
Why wait so long?
 

STL fan in MN

Registered User
Aug 16, 2007
7,638
5,143
I won't get into the weeds about where he has the the top guys ranked, but I wonder what he knows about Stiga that puts him at 64 in the ranking.
I found that interesting too. I recall Button gushing over Stiga at the U18s, talking about him making a push for the late 1st round/early 2nd round. So I expected Craig to have him in that range.

And he came out with a ranking on May 22 as well and had Stiga at 48. Stiga has played 0 games since then yet dropped 16 spots. Maybe it’s because he officially measured in at 5’10” even at the Combine? That’s really the only thing that’s happened regarding Stiga since early May.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,616
17,150
San Diego
Why wait so long?

People will find a reason to complain about anything nowadays.

In a normal year, the SCF would be over and the focus would shift to the draft. Release rankings a month in advance and most of the general public would miss it in favor of the playoffs. I get that draft nerds want things asap, but I don't think there's a reward for being the first to release. Central Scouting having to release theirs in early April tends to mean their ranking is a bit stale by the time June rolls around but some people will still cite it.

I forget exactly when Bob does the actual polling, but if you polls teams/scouts closer to the draft, you'll end up with more 'accurate' rankings.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,244
10,875
Thanks for putting this out there for everyone. Unbelievable that any list that strays from the consensus is considered “bad”.

Like, Craig puts a list out that isn’t heavily influenced by other lists. Let’s just enjoy a different perspective instead of crucifying these independent thinkers.
When we look back at these lists from all the various scouting services who has actually hit well? Reality of the draft is that all but a couple to a few of kids drafted will play in the nhl as a teenager. So lots of development ahead of them and a lot of that not with the nhl clubs as they return to the chl and euro leagues plus remain to go to the ncaa. Unlike in mlb which has multiple minor leagues that they get the player soon after their draft unless that player goes unsigned and returns to the draft the next year. The nhl clubs don’t control as much of the development as mlb does.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,206
89,891
Vancouver, BC
This boards obsession with consensus rankings is hilarious.

Craig always provides one of the more authentic lists you'll see. Some posters here would have an aneurysm if they saw every single scouts individual lists like Craigs.

I'm never quite sure if a majority of this board is 14 years old and each draft is the first draft they've ever followed or if people are simply incapable of learning from the information provided by literally every single previous draft ever to happen.

There is some NHL team that has Berkley Catton ranked top-5 and some NHL team that has him in the 2nd round. The way that people try to establish a consensus ranking as a 'thing that is right' instead of a loose framework to build off of is absolutely nuts.

I don't agree with everything on Button's list but if anything it's actually 'more consensus' than the average NHL team's list probably is, considering he doesn't do DNDs or anything like that.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad