Pre-Game Talk: Countdown thread to 24-25 Season (T - 15 days) - Main Camp

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who's going to be the surprise of this camp ?

  • Beck

    Votes: 10 5.0%
  • Kapanen

    Votes: 111 55.5%
  • Heineman

    Votes: 3 1.5%
  • Mesar

    Votes: 15 7.5%
  • Engstrom

    Votes: 35 17.5%
  • Farrell

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trudeau

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • F. Xhekaj

    Votes: 7 3.5%
  • Tuch

    Votes: 12 6.0%
  • Hughes

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Davidson

    Votes: 4 2.0%
  • Kidney

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    200

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,387
127,935
Montreal
I don't mind anyone who doesn't hide from their takes, its just his are quite obviously made almost entirely out of spite.

Agreed. I know we have a knack of overselling our prospects. But he goes the complete other way and undersells them. It's like he is a contrarian.

I'll even go as far as giving McCagg credit, because he also puts his name and face on his opinions even if a lot of the time I don't agree with him. I think my biggest gripe with him was for the 2022 draft. He was always on team Slaf, but he was propping him up by pretty much shitting on Wright the whole way through. And I don't think he needed to disparage one prospect in order to prop up another one.

But Snake and McCagg are pretty much on the same boat for me. Respect the fact they don't hide behind their takes, but I don't always agree with them. I listen to both of their podcasts, as well as enjoy it when they're guests on Marinaro's podcast.
 

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
52,145
29,641
Ottawa
Agreed. I know we have a knack of overselling our prospects. But he goes the complete other way and undersells them. It's like he is a contrarian.

I'll even go as far as giving McCagg credit, because he also puts his name and face on his opinions even if a lot of the time I don't agree with him. I think my biggest gripe with him was for the 2022 draft. He was always on team Slaf, but he was propping him up by pretty much shitting on Wright the whole way through. And I don't think he needed to disparage one prospect in order to prop up another one.

But Snake and McCagg are pretty much on the same boat for me. Respect the fact they don't hide behind their takes, but I don't always agree with them. I listen to both of their podcasts, as well as enjoy it when they're guests on Marinaro's podcast.
I think I understand why neither are working for nhl teams

They're dirtbags 😂
 

xX SEYF Xx

Registered User
Apr 5, 2022
1,944
4,865
Montreal
I think I understand why neither are working for nhl teams

They're dirtbags 😂
To be fair, I don't think nhl teams scouts have a much higher hit percentage neither, if they publically expressed them we would see their flaws
I'm in project management and risk mitigation, and that level of uncertainty for me is what nightmares are made of
Nhl teams take group decisions which might mitigate the risks a bit but those lone freelancers put their name and reputation at play with each and every opinion.
I like listening to what they have to say and take it as it is, an opinion, not the absolute truth, and yeah they have terrible takes sometimes and spot on other times
 

MTL Dirty Birdy

Registered User
Aug 29, 2021
1,310
1,471
Agreed. I know we have a knack of overselling our prospects. But he goes the complete other way and undersells them. It's like he is a contrarian.

I'll even go as far as giving McCagg credit, because he also puts his name and face on his opinions even if a lot of the time I don't agree with him. I think my biggest gripe with him was for the 2022 draft. He was always on team Slaf, but he was propping him up by pretty much shitting on Wright the whole way through. And I don't think he needed to disparage one prospect in order to prop up another one.

But Snake and McCagg are pretty much on the same boat for me. Respect the fact they don't hide behind their takes, but I don't always agree with them. I listen to both of their podcasts, as well as enjoy it when they're guests on Marinaro's podcast.
I feel Laraque is on snakes level and McCagg a step up simply based on the fact that he actually calls truth from time to time. Laracque and Snake are the WORST for clickbait here in Montreal
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
47,737
68,635
Texas
I feel Laraque is on snakes level and McCagg a step up simply based on the fact that he actually calls truth from time to time. Laracque and Snake are the WORST for clickbait here in Montreal
I have no issues with McCagg. I can tolerate him, probably the only guy Marinaro has on that isn't totally full of crap.
 

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
52,145
29,641
Ottawa
To be fair, I don't think nhl teams scouts have a much higher hit percentage neither, if they publically expressed them we would see their flaws
I'm in project management and risk mitigation, and that level of uncertainty for me is what nightmares are made of
Nhl teams take group decisions which might mitigate the risks a bit but those lone freelancers put their name and reputation at play with each and every opinion.
I like listening to what they have to say and take it as it is, an opinion, not the absolute truth, and yeah they have terrible takes sometimes and spot on other times
Its not about hit percentage. I'm well aware scouting is not an exact science and I don't listen to these guys with the expectations they're going to be right or wrong.

Its about not being a jackass. Don't publicly bury kids because you have an axe to grind with a segment of a fanbase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs and Andrei79

Andrei79

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
15,925
29,355
Agreed. I know we have a knack of overselling our prospects. But he goes the complete other way and undersells them. It's like he is a contrarian.

I'll even go as far as giving McCagg credit, because he also puts his name and face on his opinions even if a lot of the time I don't agree with him. I think my biggest gripe with him was for the 2022 draft. He was always on team Slaf, but he was propping him up by pretty much shitting on Wright the whole way through. And I don't think he needed to disparage one prospect in order to prop up another one.

But Snake and McCagg are pretty much on the same boat for me. Respect the fact they don't hide behind their takes, but I don't always agree with them. I listen to both of their podcasts, as well as enjoy it when they're guests on Marinaro's podcast.

My issue with people like McCagg and Boisvert is they try to come off as experts, yet I never learn anything about the game of hockey or translatable skills. It's always vague, non specific things and feelings about players. I don't care for it. At least the eliteprospects guys try to define some of their reasons why they like players, they back up with video evidence why they call them skilled/good skaters/high IQ and will even specifically mention which parts of their game needs to improve, even if sometimes it's rudimentary. I usually learn at least something in each of their video analysis. McCagg and Boisvert are basically cheap prospect fast food with an after taste. I'm not even a fan of Mesar, but that take was so dumb and without nuance.
 

billy piton

Registered User
Apr 5, 2010
928
264
Zagreb
Agreed. I know we have a knack of overselling our prospects. But he goes the complete other way and undersells them. It's like he is a contrarian.

I'll even go as far as giving McCagg credit, because he also puts his name and face on his opinions even if a lot of the time I don't agree with him. I think my biggest gripe with him was for the 2022 draft. He was always on team Slaf, but he was propping him up by pretty much shitting on Wright the whole way through. And I don't think he needed to disparage one prospect in order to prop up another one.

But Snake and McCagg are pretty much on the same boat for me. Respect the fact they don't hide behind their takes, but I don't always agree with them. I listen to both of their podcasts, as well as enjoy it when they're guests on Marinaro's podcast.

i like them way more than craig and pierre who never say anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
7,805
12,027
My issue with people like McCagg and Boisvert is they try to come off as experts, yet I never learn anything about the game of hockey or translatable skills. It's always vague, non specific things and feelings about players. I don't care for it. At least the eliteprospects guys try to define some of their reasons why they like players, they back up with video evidence why they call them skilled/good skaters/high IQ and will even specifically mention which parts of their game needs to improve, even if sometimes it's rudimentary. I usually learn at least something in each of their video analysis. McCagg and Boisvert are basically cheap prospect fast food with an after taste. I'm not even a fan of Mesar, but that take was so dumb and without nuance.
Well said. I have my own professional life and training, I read these hockey guys to learn something and pick things up. To enhance my understanding and enrichen it. More often than not, nobody in sports media offers any substance or even points to things I might have missed... the best they do is talk about moments/players that I didn't physically see... because otherwise if I see it I probably have a richer take than they share (even if I'm certain they "know" more about hockey than I do).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

SwiftyHab

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 18, 2004
4,526
8,672
Platinum Member
My issue with people like McCagg and Boisvert is they try to come off as experts, yet I never learn anything about the game of hockey or translatable skills. It's always vague, non specific things and feelings about players. I don't care for it. At least the eliteprospects guys try to define some of their reasons why they like players, they back up with video evidence why they call them skilled/good skaters/high IQ and will even specifically mention which parts of their game needs to improve, even if sometimes it's rudimentary. I usually learn at least something in each of their video analysis. McCagg and Boisvert are basically cheap prospect fast food with an after taste. I'm not even a fan of Mesar, but that take was so dumb and without nuance.
well said
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time

dauv

Registered User
Sep 23, 2022
70
123
I feel Laraque is on snakes level and McCagg a step up simply based on the fact that he actually calls truth from time to time. Laracque and Snake are the WORST for clickbait here in Montreal
i think Laraque is a blowhard when it comes to hockey talk. Honestly hate his analysis and his views. He thinks he knows hockey but has some of the worst takes, trades and insights I have ever heard. Having said that, He is a decent radio host and he seems like a genuine nice guy that seems like a cool dude, someone that would be great to grab a beer with kind of guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTL Dirty Birdy

Wateredgarden

Registered User
Oct 10, 2020
915
1,249
Boisvert had some pretty good picks in the past but also pretty bad ones. He'll never work for an organisation though, he's way too close minded about all his takes and kind of contradicts himself too often, nobody would be able to work with that guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

Hannibal

Fear the Weber
Feb 11, 2007
10,662
7,850
I wish and my finger are crossed that HuGo finds a way to put Kapanen, Tuch and maube Heineman at the start of the year on our bottom6. We need that. We need that identity.
 

Wateredgarden

Registered User
Oct 10, 2020
915
1,249
I wish and my finger are crossed that HuGo finds a way to put Kapanen, Tuch and maube Heineman at the start of the year on our bottom6. We need that. We need that identity.
Heineman will be in the NHL, likely as an extra forward. Kapanen might play wing to start the season if he makes it. Tuch is going to Laval.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad