Value of: Corey Perry

[CreeksideStrangler]

lol at the poster saying he can't and won't be traded... what about Hall???

either way he is only 31 and I would take him as our 1st line rw any day of the week.

signed Maple Leafs

 

[NEWFowler]

lol at the poster saying he can't and won't be traded... what about Hall???

either way he is only 31 and I would take him as our 1st line rw any day of the week.

signed Maple Leafs

What about him?

 

[heilongjetsfan]

I could see the Jets making an offer for his dunk-tank rights, or perhaps the right to throw pies at him. Laine still hasn't recovered fully from his scummy little slew foot at the WHC. Jets fans would line up for miles to hand over 20 bucks a pop. New arena courtesy of Katy!

 

[Toby Flenderson]

He doesn't show up in the playoffs, I'd trade him for an OK price.

If Pitt could move fleury for draft picks I would do

Hornqvist+2017 1st+Sprong
For
Perry+2017 3rd

Would make us lethal for the next 4 years at least

 

[Theridion]

His value is probably a 3 1st rounders or 1 or 2 and a young hyped prospect or two.

But when you talk trade, with salaries, then it becomes more difficult.

Maybe a team deals a slightly younger star, say 27-28 year old earning 5-6 per year and throws in a prospect and pick.

So his value in Pez candy is like 1,000,000,000.
His value in a vacuum is some good youngsters and picks.
His value in the real world? Contracts matter and there has to be the right fit. Is Larson really worth Hall?

 

[Shadow Flyer]

He doesn't show up in the playoffs, I'd trade him for an OK price.

Dude has 78 points in 97 playoff games...

 

[dracom]

Dude has 78 points in 97 playoff games...

recency bias.

 

[Sojourn]

Dude has 78 points in 97 playoff games...

It's just recency bias. These last playoffs he was very, very underwhelming.

 

[dracom]

It's just recency bias. These last playoffs he was very, very underwhelming.

yet, he was inches away from tying the game in game 7. oh how things would have changed if he scored that goal

 

[Shadow Flyer]

recency bias.

It's just recency bias. These last playoffs he was very, very underwhelming.

Yea, the "what have you done for me lately?" syndrome.

I get it, he wasn't good this past postseason. He needed to be better and he wasn't, so some fans are understandably ticked. Seven game sample size is a dangerous way to place value on a player, though. I'd take Perry on my team any day.

 

[ShadowDuck]

Are the Detroit and LA series recency bias? He was just as much of a no show then.


Close to tying in game 7? The same Corey Perry who had 0 goals all series, decides to take every shot in the last 2 minutes instead of passing to wide open teammates (Fowler).

 

[mytduxfan*]

Are the Detroit and LA series recency bias? He was just as much of a no show then.


Close to tying in game 7? The same Corey Perry who had 0 goals all series, decides to take every shot in the last 2 minutes instead of passing to wide open teammates (Fowler).

And that's all on Perry? It had nothing to do with the fact that Rakell was completely broken and probably shouldn't have been playing?

Perry isn't a playoff no-show. You want a playoff no-show go look up Nash or Ladd's numbers.

 

[Sojourn]

Are the Detroit and LA series recency bias? He was just as much of a no show then.


Close to tying in game 7? The same Corey Perry who had 0 goals all series, decides to take every shot in the last 2 minutes instead of passing to wide open teammates (Fowler).

Yes, they are because you aren't looking at the entirety of the playoffs. A player isn't a no show for an entire playoffs because he has a bad series. That's just the nature of goal scorers. They run hot and cold.

I'm not going to pretend Perry hasn't had some bad playoff series, but calling him a playoff no show is simply wrong. In fact, I'd say that your examples prove even further that it's recency bias, because you're only looking at the last series of those playoffs.

 

[LondonKendrick]

Think Benning would offer Juolevi for him?

 

[ShadowDuck]

Yes, they are because you aren't looking at the entirety of the playoffs. A player isn't a no show for an entire playoffs because he has a bad series. That's just the nature of goal scorers. They run hot and cold.

I'm not going to pretend Perry hasn't had some bad playoff series, but calling him a playoff no show is simply wrong. In fact, I'd say that your examples prove even further that it's recency bias, because you're only looking at the last series of those playoffs.

I'll give you the LA year since he was fine against Dallas. T

The Ducks lost vs Detroit in the first round, and his disappearing act was almost a mirror image of his series this year.

But I guess I'm just cherry picking that year and this year, in that case.

 

[Sojourn]

I'll give you the LA year since he was fine against Dallas. T

The Ducks lost vs Detroit in the first round, and his disappearing act was almost a mirror image of his series this year.

But I guess I'm just cherry picking that year and this year, in that case.

I'm not questioning that he has had some disappointing playoff series. I don't think any Anaheim fan would deny that. It just doesn't seem fair, or accurate, to call him a playoff no-show. He's been good for us more often than he's been bad. The bad might stand out more, especially given the expectations we have for him, but they don't erase the times he's been a good player for us in the playoffs.

 

[Arthuros]

Perry is worth more to us than most teams would offer, let's leave it at that.

Some teams don't want him at our price tag, some teams don't want him at the fair price tag, and the rest of the teams don't want him at any price tag.

 

[go4hockey]

Bobby Ryan was 26 years old when he was traded to the Sens. Perry is 31 and makes 8.625 mil for another 5 years until he is 36.

I would respectfully disagree that he nets anything like Ryans return and again refer to me original post that any and all offers would be insulting to Duck fans.

Perry is a far better player than Ryan could ever dream of being and even with his age and contract he would land a good package.

 

[go4hockey]

Dude has 78 points in 97 playoff games...

Well you know HF only seem to remember what you did last week and if you had a bad week your value falls to zero.

 

[airforceones25]

I can't believe I'm saying this but with the right return I'd be open to moving Perry or Getzlaf simply due to the fact that their contracts really limit the Ducks ability to round out a complete roster. It's not their faults as they are getting paid fair value but rather our cheap ass billionaire owners who refuse to spend to the cap.

 

[One Winged Angel]

Well you know HF only seem to remember what you did last week and if you had a bad week your value falls to zero.

Tell that to everyone ******** on Rick Nash.

 

[gratefulyours]

I can't believe I'm saying this but with the right return I'd be open to moving Perry or Getzlaf simply due to the fact that their contracts really limit the Ducks ability to round out a complete roster. It's not their faults as they are getting paid fair value but rather our cheap ass billionaire owners who refuse to spend to the cap.

stoner and bieksa type contracts limit our ability to round out the roster.

getz and perry are part of the core contracts you build around.

 

[airforceones25]

stoner and bieksa type contracts limit our ability to round out the roster.

getz and perry are part of the core contracts you build around.

While their contracts certainly contribute to that, it really boils down to the inability and willingness of our owners to not open up their wallets. The minimal amounts Stoner and Bieska are overpaid shouldn't have that much bearing on what we can and can't do. They are such penny punchers that we are relegated to playing hardball with our own RFA's, signing old washed up aging veterans to minimal amounts, and now are forced to move a young asset on a great contract to try to get and couple more cheap pieces to fill out our forward roster all while staying at some weak internal budget.