Controversial Regular Season Report Card | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Controversial Regular Season Report Card

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedWingsNow*
  • Start date Start date

RedWingsNow*

Guest
Forwards
Datsyuk A -- Led the team in goals, points, +/-, PP goals, game winning goals, OT goals, takeaways, faceoff wins (225 more than anyone else).
Pavel is the MVP of the team,IMO. He was asked to do more than ever, carrying a sickly looking line for a month, carrying Abdelkader almost the entire second half, and doing more than ever defensively because of the need for someone who can win draws. Still, there were times this year he looked tired and just off.
Zetterberg B+ -- Productive year for Hank. People talked about him like an MVP candidate about 15 games in. But before the last 4 games, he went nearly half the season (23 games with 2G and 10 assists). His late season awakening was crucial tot he Wings getting in. It also saved him from his second MINUS season in three years. As productive as Zetterberg was, Z's goal scoring was a bit disappointing, and Hank needs to show he can be a plus player at center all year. Because if Pavel walks after next season ...
Franzen -- B- -- Good old Mule played 41 games. Double his numbers for these 82 game totals -- 28 goals 62 Points. That's about what people expect of Franzen. The problem is that Franzen played heartless hockey for way too much of the year. One understands Datsyuk and Zetterberg and Brunner dragging after they played 30 games in Europe. Still, Mule put up the numbers and looked much better as the go-to man on a line with Flip.
Brunner -- B -- Over an 82 game season, he pro-rates about 23 goals and 50 points. Nice find. But a bit disappointing because of the hot start he had. Needs to take Datsyuk lessons on winning board battles. Defense was brutal at times, but at times he showed willingness to hurry back and break up plays.
Filppula -- D -- Flip also played 41 games. So for 82 games -- 18 goals, 34 points. That's pretty brutal. He showed some signs of life late. Looked completely disinterested far too often.
Cleary -- D -- Is the worst player on the team, in my opinion. Worse than Emmerton. Worse than Eaves. Worse than Miller. Maybe not worse than Lashoff. 9 goals sounds OK. It works out to a 15-16 goal season. But 15 points with the ice time he had is just not acceptable. Worse, he seems to have taken Bertuzzi's role as the "dumb penalty" king. His defense, once strong, has suffered because he can't get up and down the ice with NHL caliber skaters.
Abdelkader - B -- Don't get me wrong, I think Abdelkader is a plug. It's not his fault he's misused. Abdelader finished on pace for an 18 goal 5 assist season. He basically proved that anyone can be a 20 goal scorer in this league with the right linemates and icetime. But Abdelkader deserves credit for physical hockey, good work on the PK, and playing with effort all year long.
Emmerton - C - -- Emmerton impressed the hell out of me early, looked pretty decent late. But he was really not very good for a long stretch. His 45 percent faceoff rate is tough to accept. A guy like him needs to be 50 percent or higher to have any future in this league.
Miller -- D -- Drew Miller had a rough year. Maybe he's starting to see that the youth movement is going to make him expendable. Miller had his chances this year, playing alongside Zetterberg for a spell. But he just couldn't get it done. Finished on a 15 point pace. Still a valuable PK guy. But PK guys like him are a dime a dozen.
Andersson -- C - -- Remember that 2 goal Joakim had against Vancouver? Yeah. it does seem like forever ago. Production fell off the charts when Tatar went to GR. Looked good as Nyquist got his legs. Andersson seems to work hard, but he's really soft for a big guy. He loses too many faceoffs, too. Andersson seems like he's got two-way skills. But really lackluster two-way skills. Not all that great on defense. Not very good offensively, either.
Eaves -- C - -- Was having a forgettable year until he started playing well over the last three weeks. Good come back year for him though. Showed he can still be an NHLer.
Tatar -- B+ -- Looked really good in his stint with Detroit and his 5-on-5 production was best on the team all year. Inexplicably demoted.
Nyquist -- B -- Really caught on the last 2-3 weeks of the season after a very uninspiring start. Check out his takeaway numbers. 19 in 22 games. Shows really good skill. But for whatever reason, he can't seem to finish the great chances he creates for himself.
Tootoo -- C+ -- Hit hard. Dropped the gloves. Skated well. Had some defensive issues but was really underutlized
Bertuzzi -- INC
Samuelsson -- INC
Helm -- INC

DEFENSE
Kronwall -- B -- Much was expected. Maybe too much. At one point, he led NHL defensemen in scoring even as the minuses piled up. He had like 18 points in 19 games. He finished with 13 in his final 29. But his defense was much improved in the second half, too.
Kindl -- B -- Kindl's production was pretty good. His +15 really stands out. He still has big troubles getting caught out of position and coughing up the puck, though. But good for him for winning a job this year. Hopefully he can iron out the kinks in his game and continue to get PP time. Averaged over a hit per game, but can be better.
Ericsson -- B -- Still makes too many boneheaded mistakes and he's as gaffe prone as Kindl. But Ericsson is a pretty nice fit for this team. Led a soft defense in hits.
Smith -- C -- This was a rookie year and Smith made lots of rookie mistakes. Toward the end, he showed improvement and more flashes of the offense we expected to see. He's always going to have defensive issues. He's pretty careless with the puck. Also, while he plays with a chip, he's not very physical.
Lashoff - D -- AHL player playing in an NHL situation and he was exploited. His three-year contract is absolutely mystifying. With Kindl, Smith and Dekeyser in the lineup next year, do you really want a young guy like Lashoff as your #7?
White - D -- I feel for White, because he's a guy who needs to play in scoring situations with puck possession guys. He spent too much of his time in third line situations and was bumped from the powerplay, so his numbers slipped. He did a nice job for us last year. Sucks that this year killed his contract value.
Quincey - C+ -- After a brutal start, he had a hockey labotomy and went to simplistic, back-to-basic D. No risky passes. No skating the puck up. No joining the rush. No hitting and no penalties. Truth is, I prefer Labotomy Quincey to the asshat who played for us last year. Quincey's defensive game improved when he put his cage on because he got more physical. We need him to be physical.
Dekeyser -- B+ -- Plays a soft, but smart game of defense-first hockey. Passes the puck OK too. Seems to have a head for the game.

Howard -- A -- Bounced back from a bad start and was impressive down the stretch. Needs to show he's a playoff goalie now.
Gustavsson -- INC -- Had a couple brutal games, and a couple nice games.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agree with most of them, but Smith is a C-/D+ to me. Never looked comfortable handling the puck, takes too many penalties, hasn't shown off his skating/rushing ability much, and wasn't very good defensively.

Most of his strong defensive plays were purely from athleticism rather than positioning and IQ.

He's still young and has a ton of potential though. We seen how much Kindl blossomed with some seasoning and confidence (although playing time was a big part of Kindl's coming out party.)
 
Grades are based on my expectations.

Datsyuk A+
Zetterberg A+
Filppula D
Franzen A-
Cleary D
Abdelkader B-
Brunner B-
Nyquist B
Tatar B
Eaves C-
Tootoo C+
Miller C-
Emmerton B-
Andersson B

Kronwall B
Ericsson B
DeKeyser A-
Kindl B+
Smith D+
Quincey D
Lashoff D-

Howard A+
Gustavsson C+
 
Let's see.

Zetterberg: A+
Howard: A+
Datsyuk: A
Franzen: A-
Kronwall: B+
Dekeyser: B+
Ericsson: B+
Mrazek: B+
Brunner: B
Tatar: B
Andersson: B
Kindl: B
Abdelkader: B-
Nyquist: B-
Tootoo: C+
Smith: C
Lashoff: C
Huskins: C
Emmerton: C
Eaves: C-
Miller: C-
Filppula: D
Colaiacovo: D
Gustavsson: D
White: D-
Quincey: F
Cleary: He plays realgud (F--)
 
I'm giving myself an A+. I think I've really excelled this season with my posts. I've really grown into a bigger role.
 
I'm giving myself an A+. I think I've really excelled this season with my posts. I've really grown into a bigger role.

Agreed. Most Improved Poster ;)

Bob's grades are a little harsh here and there but I agree for the most part.
 
You people are far too generous with Abdelkator. The guy is an absolute waste of his linemates' effort. As Datsyuk hinted, he is a better player without his stick... probably without his skates and in the pressbox too. C- (and that's for his "a stick fires once a year" hat trick)
 
Grades are based on my expectations.

Datsyuk A+
Zetterberg A+
Filppula D
Franzen A-
Cleary D
Abdelkader B-
Brunner B-
Nyquist B
Tatar B
Eaves C-
Tootoo C+
Miller C-
Emmerton B-
Andersson B

Kronwall B
Ericsson B
DeKeyser A-
Kindl B+
Smith D+
Quincey D
Lashoff D-

Howard A+
Gustavsson C+

Mine would be extremely close to this.
 
You people are far too generous with Abdelkator. The guy is an absolute waste of his linemates' effort. As Datsyuk hinted, he is a better player without his stick... probably without his skates and in the pressbox too. C- (and that's for his "a stick fires once a year" hat trick)

N1t0F.jpg
 
Based off performance and expectations.

Datsyuk A Amazing season.
Zetterberg A- Very solid season, played through injuries and carried team down the stretch
Franzen B Really, typical season for him. Would have scored around 30 goals in a full season
Filpulla D+ Really picked the wrong time, UFA at the end of season, to lay an egg
Miler C He is what he is
Tootoo C+ brought grit and intensity, little else
Helm Inc.
Abdelkader B Developed more than I thought he would
Brunner A the first half, D- the second, about a C- overall with upside
Bettuzzi Inc.
Samuelsson Inc.
Cleary D+ Stick a fork in him
Andersson C- Too much ice time but okay player
Nyquist C+ Did well in limited roll
Tatar C+ see Nyquist
Emmerton C- Okay on PK that's about it
Eaves C- Nice to see him come back, but contributed little
Mursak Inc. Say hello to the KHL

Defense

Kronwall B Slipped offensively down the stretch but defense improved
Ericsson B Developed into a top four
Kindl B Like Ericsson, he developed nicely this year
Colaiacovo D Didn't play much, didn't contribute when he did
Quincey C+ played solid D giving up any offensive contribution
White F Was lost without Lidstrom
Smith D+ Looked lost and out of sorts, will bounce back
Lashoff C Played third pair minutes when the club needed them
Huskins C Didn't embarrass himself signed off the street
Dekeyser C Defense came together when he signed but he plays too many minutes on the Power play.

Goalie

Howard A The teams Most valuable player
Gustafsson C Solid backup when healthy
Mrazak C Showed talanet when forced into the lineup

Babcock C Couldn't find a way to keep Tatar in the lineup but continued to play Emmerton, Eaves and Cleary

Holland D- Did absolutely nothing to help the team down the stretch, no pickups other than Dekeyser. I think he was asleep at his desk
 
I've included both "pure" grades, and "compared to my expectations" grades; listed under the headings of "objective" and "subjective".

Forwards | Obj. | Sub.
Datsyuk|A+|A
Zetterberg|A+|A
Franzen|B|A-
Brunner|B|A+
Filppula|B-|D
Nyquist|B-|B-
Tatar|B-|B+
Tootoo|C|B-
Abdelkader|C|B
Andersson|C|B+
Emmerton|C|B+
Miller|C-|B
Eaves|C-|B
Cleary|D|C-
Helm|Inc.|Inc.
Bertuzzi|Inc.|Inc.
Samuelsson|Inc.|Inc.
Defensemen | Obj. | Sub.
Kronwall|A-|B+
Ericsson|A-|A
Kindl|B+|B+
DeKeyser|B|A+
Smith|B-|B-
Quincey|C+|C+
White|C|D
Lashoff|D|B+
Colaiacovo|Inc.|Inc.
Goalies | Obj. | Sub.
Howard|A|A+
Mrazek|B+|A
Gustavsson|D|F

Just for clarification (to prevent questions that I know will come) the first column is an absolute rating; performance graded only based on the NHL's level of play. The second is a grade based on how well the players did compared to my expectations.
 
You people are far too generous with Abdelkator. The guy is an absolute waste of his linemates' effort. As Datsyuk hinted, he is a better player without his stick... probably without his skates and in the pressbox too. C- (and that's for his "a stick fires once a year" hat trick)

Abdelkader should be on a grind line. Not his fault Babcock plays him way to far up the lineup.

He's still a solid 4th line grinder.
 
Just for clarification (to prevent questions that I know will come) the first column is an absolute rating; performance graded only based on the NHL's level of play. The second is a grade based on how well the players did compared to my expectations.

How is your subjective grade of Franzen higher than your objective one? The guy puts up points very consistently, but usually puts in far too little effort. If anything, the subjective rating should be lower.
 
How is your subjective grade of Franzen higher than your objective one? The guy puts up points very consistently, but usually puts in far too little effort. If anything, the subjective rating should be lower.

All grades are subjective. Eva is kidding himself
 
Datsyuk: A+
Zetterberg: A
Franzen: A-
Nyquist: B
Tatar: B
Brunner: B-
Abdelkader: B-
Andersson: C+
Emmerton: C+
Tootoo: C
Eaves: C
Miller: C-
Filppula: D-
Cleary: D-
Sammy: Inc
Bert: Inc
Helm: Inc

DeKeyser: B+
Kronwall: B
Ericsson: B
Kindl: B
Smith: C
Quincey: C-
White: D+
Lashoff: D
Cola: Inc

Howard: A+
Monster: D
 
Datsyuk: A+++
Zetterberg: B
Franzen: C+
Nyquist: B
Tatar: C/Inc
Brunner: B
Abdelkader: C
Andersson: B-
Emmerton: B
Tootoo: A-
Eaves: B-
Miller: C
Filppula: C
Cleary: C-
Sammy: Inc
Bert: Inc
Helm: Inc

DeKeyser: B+
Kronwall: C
Ericsson: B
Kindl: B+
Smith: B
Quincey: B-
White: C-
Lashoff: C+
Cola: Inc

Howard: A+
Monster: C
 
Datsyuk: A
Zetterberg: A
Franzen: B
Nyquist: B
Tatar: B
Brunner: B-
Abdelkader: C+
Andersson: B-
Emmerton: B
Tootoo: C
Eaves: C
Miller: C+
Filppula: D-
Cleary: D-
Sammy: Inc
Bert: Inc
Helm: Inc

DeKeyser: A
Kronwall: B (6th overall in points despite being lackluster defensively)
Ericsson: B+
Kindl: B
Smith: C
Quincey: C-
White: D+
Lashoff: C
Cola: Inc

Howard: A
Monster: D
 
Forwards | Grade
Datsyuk|A
Zetterberg|B+
Franzen|B-
Brunner|B
Filppula|D
Abdelkader|D+
Cleary|D-
Nyquist|B-
Tatar|A
Tootoo|B
Andersson|C+
Emmerton|C
Miller|C-
Eaves|C-
Helm|INC.
Bertuzzi|INC.
Samuelsson|INC.
Defensemen | Grade
Kronwall|B
Ericsson|A-
Kindl|B+
DeKeyser|A
Smith|C-
Quincey|C-
White|C
Lashoff|D
Colaiacovo|INC.
Goalies | Grade
Howard|A
Mrazek|B+
Gustavsson|INC.
 
Datsyuk: A+++
Zetterberg: B
Franzen: C+
Nyquist: B
Tatar: C/Inc
Brunner: B
Abdelkader: C
Andersson: B-
Emmerton: B
Tootoo: A-
Eaves: B-
Miller: C
Filppula: C
Cleary: C-
Sammy: Inc
Bert: Inc
Helm: Inc

DeKeyser: B+
Kronwall: C
Ericsson: B
Kindl: B+
Smith: B
Quincey: B-
White: C-
Lashoff: C+
Cola: Inc

Howard: A+
Monster: C

How does Tatar warrant a C when he produced more even strength points per minute than any other Red Wing?

How does Lashoff -- who gushed goals against, warrant a higher grade of C+?
 
All grades are subjective. Eva is kidding himself

Eh, you could come up with an "objective" grade by averaging out comparable contracts at the same position, then looking at their stats. Like +/-, points, TOI. That kind of takes your own opinion out of it.

And we've gone that way with Franzen. People often point to his production as proof that he's playing fine. Maybe, when looking at just the numbers he's in line with the other $4M wingers around the league. But subjectively, when you watch him, it's pretty obvious that some games he decides to bring it and other games he doesn't at all.

Of course the problem with this method is that Franzen's contract was pre-New CBA, so it's got that artificial cap lowering garbage in there. Anyone signed afterwards is not going to have that, makes it tougher to compare. But relatively speaking, Franzen does put up appropriate points.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad