Cont'd - NHL makes 12-year/$5.2 billion Canadian TV deal w/ Sportsnet, CBC, TSN out

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hollywood Burrows

Registered User
Jan 23, 2009
5,561
2,844
EAST VANCOUVER
You should not - in BC much superior to what Shaw has offered.

I'm not sure that's a widely held view, at all. YMMV, I think.

At least in internet speeds Shaw is much faster than Telus (now up to 250 megabits is most of western canada, Telus is still beta testing their 50 meg connections)

Just for reference, Shaw's basic package is now 3990 a month, includes tsn/sportsnet/sportsnet1 in HD (but not TSN2 or sportsnet 360,which are part of a 10 dollar theme pack that includes sportsnet west and ontario) and comes with a free HD receiver. That's a month-to-month service, no contract, etc. The promo offer you get along with this would vary depending on the time of year, usually a 3 or 6 month reduced rate and free hardware rentals.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,392
28,797
Toronto, ON
There is no mention to how much promo time they will actually receive. The entire production for that time slot is at the mercy of Rogers and we have no idea how it will pan out going forward. What if they receive one commercial slot per break, or per period? Is it then ok for Rogers to fill the rest with advertisement revenue and utilize the public broadcasting stations prime time slot for their own revenue?

Where does it end? Honestly, I get how people can look at this and say "they're getting it for free!" and you could be right, but the fact that revenue from a crown corporations product is going to a private enterprise just doesn't sit right with me.

Yes. This is actually worse than CBC dying honorably. Now they're pimping out a public institution to a corporation -- one of the worst corporations at that.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,392
28,797
Toronto, ON
You are continuing to forget that the CBC is receiving the right to air their promotional ads for their programming. This is not giving anything for free.

Being able to promote their craptastic line up of mediocre shows, the CBC is in fact receiving millions of dollars in promotional spots, for free.

With absolutely no risk.

You have to realize that:

1. In the current regime, CBC is advertising their crappy programs heavily in HNiC; who knows to what extent Rogers will allow CBC to advertise their crappy programs in the new regime.

2. In the current regime, CBC gets free promos AND profits from HNiC. These free promos + profits are used to heavily subsidize other CBC programs. In the future regime, they will not get those profits.

Basically, CBC will struggle much more under the new system because they are not going to be making profits ON TOP OF free promo.

The new regime primarily benefits Rogers. To take a cultural institution like HNiC and a public institution like CBC and use it as a mere tool for one of the most monopolistic corporations in Canada is really a national tragedy.
 

Nihiliste

Registered User
Feb 8, 2010
11,576
4,732
You have to realize that:

1. In the current regime, CBC is advertising their crappy programs heavily in HNiC; who knows to what extent Rogers will allow CBC to advertise their crappy programs in the new regime.

2. In the current regime, CBC gets free promos AND profits from HNiC. These free promos + profits are used to heavily subsidize other CBC programs. In the future regime, they will not get those profits.

Basically, CBC will struggle much more under the new system because they are not going to be making profits ON TOP OF free promo.

The new regime primarily benefits Rogers. To take a cultural institution like HNiC and a public institution like CBC and use it as a mere tool for one of the most monopolistic corporations in Canada is really a national tragedy.

They don't get profits from HNIC but they also don't have the majority of the costs anymore which is something. I have to think a big part of this is what Lacroix said; this allows them to keep their sports infrastructure and fulfill their contractual obligations like the Olympics and World Cup and what not. After a few years Rogers will probably take HNIC away and CBC may indeed be finished but we're not there yet, and I'm fine with that happening 4 years from now rather than this upcoming summer.
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,408
258
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
They don't get profits from HNIC but they also don't have the majority of the costs anymore which is something. I have to think a big part of this is what Lacroix said; this allows them to keep their sports infrastructure and fulfill their contractual obligations like the Olympics and World Cup and what not. After a few years Rogers will probably take HNIC away and CBC may indeed be finished but we're not there yet, and I'm fine with that happening 4 years from now rather than this upcoming summer.
It a face saving gesture whoever running the CBC get to kick that can 4 years down the road. Rogers get to alleviate some of the backlash expected but not all of it obviously.
 

Wetcoaster

Guest
It a face saving gesture whoever running the CBC get to kick that can 4 years down the road. Rogers get to alleviate some of the backlash expected but not all of it obviously.
Unlike Bell/TSN's face planting gesture? ;)
 

Mr. Fancy Pants

Registered User
Sep 20, 2002
533
176
Gifu
Visit site
They don't get profits from HNIC but they also don't have the majority of the costs anymore which is something. I have to think a big part of this is what Lacroix said; this allows them to keep their sports infrastructure and fulfill their contractual obligations like the Olympics and World Cup and what not. After a few years Rogers will probably take HNIC away and CBC may indeed be finished but we're not there yet, and I'm fine with that happening 4 years from now rather than this upcoming summer.

That's exactly what they want. If HNIC went away right away, there would be a much bigger outcry. Instead Rogers will slowly ease out HNIC and CBC from the picture. Without the NHL, CBC will basically die.

It was kind of hard watching the press conference as the CBC President tried to save face but he knows the writing is on the wall.
 

hersky77

Registered User
Oct 29, 2007
8,370
652
It's going to be so sad not seeing hockey on tsn anymore. This leafs pens game is Tsn hockey in a nutshell. I hope sportsnet can get there act together.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,392
28,797
Toronto, ON
Nice to see that the same company that has fought tooth and nail to prevent Verizon from competing in Canada now has a stranglehold monopoly on hockey and has killed our public broadcasting service. Not only have they killed it, they are making sure they pimp it out for a few extra dollars before they kill it.

Stay classy, Rogers.
 

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,303
2,607
Canada
It's going to be so sad not seeing hockey on tsn anymore. This leafs pens game is Tsn hockey in a nutshell. I hope sportsnet can get there act together.

HockeyCentral has been impossible to listen to that past couple days. There's something to be said for people with tact and respect for their competition. Kypreos and Millard lack this is spades.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
Nice to see that the same company that has fought tooth and nail to prevent Verizon from competing in Canada now has a stranglehold monopoly on hockey and has killed our public broadcasting service. Not only have they killed it, they are making sure they pimp it out for a few extra dollars before they kill it.

Stay classy, Rogers.

oh boo hoo

Rogers (or Bell for that matter) have no reason to make CBC their charity case.
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,408
258
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
HockeyCentral has been impossible to listen to that past couple days. There's something to be said for people with tact and respect for their competition. Kypreos and Millard lack this is spades.
Cut them some slack it not every day you learn that you have a job for the next decade. It normal that some want to take a victory lap. Also they had to eat some crow in the past apparently being the third wheels in the last TV deal was not all that fun.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,392
28,797
Toronto, ON
Cut them some slack it not every day you learn that you have a job for the next decade. It normal that some want to take a victory lap. Also they had to eat some crow in the past apparently being the third wheels in the last TV deal was not all that fun.

Well, Sportsnet will remain a middle school quality production with Kypreos and Millard.

There is no incentive for Sportsnet to improve now that they have a stranglehold monopoly on hockey in Canada. But if they decide to improve, then Kypreos and Millard might find themselves OUT of a job now that Sportsnet is not just showing programming with zero viewership.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,392
28,797
Toronto, ON
They don't get profits from HNIC but they also don't have the majority of the costs anymore which is something. I have to think a big part of this is what Lacroix said; this allows them to keep their sports infrastructure and fulfill their contractual obligations like the Olympics and World Cup and what not. After a few years Rogers will probably take HNIC away and CBC may indeed be finished but we're not there yet, and I'm fine with that happening 4 years from now rather than this upcoming summer.

Profits = Revenue - Expenses

So if they don't get profits, the fact they don't pay expenses is a meaningless and redundant thing to say. They've simply been shut out of hockey, and soon from broadcasting altogether.
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,408
258
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
Well, Sportsnet will remain a middle school quality production with Kypreos and Millard.

There is no incentive for Sportsnet to improve now that they have a stranglehold monopoly on hockey in Canada. But if they decide to improve, then Kypreos and Millard might find themselves OUT of a job now that Sportsnet is not just showing programming with zero viewership.
They will improve just look at RDS it was amateur hour (Crap game sound, late to go HD...) for a better part of their first deal with the Habs but they eventually cleaned their act. A bit too late but they did. Sporstnet right now is mile better then where RDS was when they first got the Habs. With way more games they will have to hire more peoples and since Sporstnet is now the only game in town they get to pick the cream and leave the dead wood with TSN/CBC. Same for TVA sports really.

Profits = Revenue - Expenses

So if they don't get profits, the fact they don't pay expenses is a meaningless and redundant thing to say. They've simply been shut out of hockey, and soon from broadcasting altogether.
It not that simple CBC also don't have to spend anything to replace that 6 to 8 hours of content every Saturday night for the next four years. The cost of HNIC was already borderline with the revenue stream they got out of it in the previous deal. This deal is just in a totally different league they just could not keep up.
 
Last edited:

The CyNick

Freedom of Speech!
Sep 17, 2009
11,364
2,032
Nice to see that the same company that has fought tooth and nail to prevent Verizon from competing in Canada now has a stranglehold monopoly on hockey and has killed our public broadcasting service. Not only have they killed it, they are making sure they pimp it out for a few extra dollars before they kill it.

Stay classy, Rogers.

Moronic.

Bell was doing the same thing when Verizon was sniffing around, and they would have been happy to take all the NHL broadcast rights.

Boooohooo poor CBC that cant survive on their own. I know, lets start a rally for them.
 

FakeKidPoker*

Guest
This hardly kills CBC.

Sure CBCSports as we know it will suffer... but CBC on the whole will be fine.

This also could mean future success in the future with CBC getting even more Olympics and World Cups.
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,561
Edmonton
This hardly kills CBC.

Sure CBCSports as we know it will suffer... but CBC on the whole will be fine.

This also could mean future success in the future with CBC getting even more Olympics and World Cups.

Uhmm what?

And once HNIC dies CBC is going to whither and die.
 

ebox99

Registered User
May 8, 2009
271
0
This hardly kills CBC.

Sure CBCSports as we know it will suffer... but CBC on the whole will be fine.

This also could mean future success in the future with CBC getting even more Olympics and World Cups.

CBC should not use public money on Olympics and World Cups. It's too expensive for them. Having CBC bid for those rights only increases the rights fees and the public will pay for it.

If CBC doesn't bid then price could be lowered due to less competition and the public would get to view the events anyway.

I don't see a good argument for CBC bidding for expensive events that will be shown by another station at likely a lower price.
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,408
258
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
This hardly kills CBC.

Sure CBCSports as we know it will suffer... but CBC on the whole will be fine.

This also could mean future success in the future with CBC getting even more Olympics and World Cups.
It might even be the kick in the pants they need to finally reinvent the damn network. God only know they been coasting on Hockey with little else worth watching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad