Rumor: Conor Garland Contract / Trade Rumors (UPD: Coyotes are "very much trying to move")

[The Feckless Puck]

DUMB THEORY ALERT: I wonder if BA is passive-aggressively hoping that Seattle will tender an offer to Garland as their pick in the expansion draft in order to get some draft assets back.

 

[Bonsai Tree]

As a word or two of caution, “fail for Nail. “

 

[rt]

yes, but isn't wright & wrong better used together?

Nope. Ride or die. All in. No going back.

 

[Jakey53]

I think the core may be just Chychrun. Everything else on the table.

Of course everyone else is on the table, but realistically, you can't trade all of your top five players in one year.

 

[hbk]

Of course everyone else is on the table, but realistically, you can't trade all of your top five players in one year.

And we won’t. We will still ice a competitive team.

 

[Name Nameless]

DUMB THEORY ALERT: I wonder if BA is passive-aggressively hoping that Seattle will tender an offer to Garland as their pick in the expansion draft in order to get some draft assets back.

Garland gets protected, the only way he can be poached should be with a regular offer sheet, unless I have misunderstood.?

 

[hbk]

Garland gets protected, the only way he can be poached should be with a regular offer sheet, unless I have misunderstood.?

Offer sheet away!!!

 

[Name Nameless]

Offer sheet away!!!

Not yet, technically... That's 11 days or so into the future.

 

[XX]

Garland's compensation is only a first and a third for an AAV in his wheelhouse. He's worth more than that in trade.

 

[hbk]

Not yet, technically... That's 11 days or so into the future.

my thought process is the way Garland plays makes me think we will keep him. That being said the rumour mill is strong. Lets see what happens in next 7 days.

 

[GhostofYotesFan47]

Would Garland + Kuemper to Colorado for a warm body and a handful of picks the next 2 years be possible if Colorado has decided they won't be brining Landy back?

 

[Name Nameless]

Garland's compensation is only a first and a third for an AAV in his wheelhouse. He's worth more than that in trade.

Can't trade him for a year after that offer sheet has been matched. Win - win.

 

[Jakey53]

And we won’t. We will still ice a competitive team.

What I'm trying to say is that Chych isn't the only core player we have.

 

[rt]

Would Garland + Kuemper to Colorado for a warm body and a handful of picks the next 2 years be possible if Colorado has decided they won't be brining Landy back?

I would require Newhook in that package. Non negotiable.

 

[XX]

Would Garland + Kuemper to Colorado for a warm body and a handful of picks the next 2 years be possible if Colorado has decided they won't be brining Landy back?

Avs will be picking late. There was chatter earlier (Friedman I believe) that said the Coyotes do not want late picks for Garland. Optics wise, a trade like that is a really hard sell.

Garland's likely ask vs his on ice impact is actually really good, so that works in AZ's favor when trying to find a trade partner.

 

[hbk]

What I'm trying to say is that Chych isn't the only core player we have.

Maybe. Who else do u consider untouchable? Garland if he had a contract? Dvorak? Soderstrom if u believe he’s legit? I dont know if i have Keller here anymore.

 

[GhostofYotesFan47]

Avs will be picking late. There was chatter earlier (Friedman I believe) that said the Coyotes do not want late picks for Garland. Optics wise, a trade like that is a really hard sell.

Garland's likely ask vs his on ice impact is actually really good, so that works in AZ's favor when trying to find a trade partner.

Ah missed that, changes things if that's the case. Also closes the door on probably half the league.

 

[Jakey53]

Maybe. Who else do u consider untouchable? Garland if he had a contract? Dvorak? Soderstrom if u believe he’s legit? I dont know if i have Keller here anymore.

You don't have to be untouchable to be part of the core. Hell, if we are being honest Chych shouldn't be untouchable. Every player on this team should be available for the right price.

 

[LittlePipes]

jakey, good point. I agree.