- Dec 28, 2015
- 544
- 309
Which players did more in playoffs run until the Finals in their careers and never won the Playoff MVP? Your picks...
I go with Dominik Hasek, Ed Belfour & Sergei Fedorov.
Fedorov is a crime that he never won, he probably would have been the winner if the Wings had won in 1995, he was totally robbed in 1997, Mike Vernon was solid but you always need the goalie to do well in order to win the Stanley Cup, he was good but nothing out of this world. The Stanley Cup finals was won not because of Vernon, the reason of Detroit sweep was the Flyers turnovers and pretty weak goaltending from Hextall & Snow. And before that in the real "Stanley Cup final" against Colorado, the only game that i thought that Vernon was the reason for the win, it was game 3. If Fedorov name was Sidney Crosby, he would have won it easily. You can also make a case for Fedorov in 1998 & 2002, but i feel Yzerman deserved in 1998 and i have no problem with Lindstrom in 2002 winning.
Belfour went to the finals the first time in 1992, he had a good run until the Penguins got the best of him and the Blackhawks in the finals, after that he was just phenomenal in both Dallas run, he got the best of Fuhr, Roy and Hasek in 1999, and the year after he was even more amazing winning by himself against the Avalanche, the Stars were getting dominated but Eddie completely stole the series. In the finals with exception of Game 1 he was fantastic too, and looked much more impressive than Brodeur.
Hasek was the only reason the Sabres went to the Stanley Cup Finals in 1999, and he was pretty solid in 2002 (way more than Vernon in 1997), you can make a case for him, like you can make for Fedorov, Lindstrom, Shanahan and Yzerman, and even Forsberg whose team was not even in the Stanley Cup Finals.
I go with Dominik Hasek, Ed Belfour & Sergei Fedorov.
Fedorov is a crime that he never won, he probably would have been the winner if the Wings had won in 1995, he was totally robbed in 1997, Mike Vernon was solid but you always need the goalie to do well in order to win the Stanley Cup, he was good but nothing out of this world. The Stanley Cup finals was won not because of Vernon, the reason of Detroit sweep was the Flyers turnovers and pretty weak goaltending from Hextall & Snow. And before that in the real "Stanley Cup final" against Colorado, the only game that i thought that Vernon was the reason for the win, it was game 3. If Fedorov name was Sidney Crosby, he would have won it easily. You can also make a case for Fedorov in 1998 & 2002, but i feel Yzerman deserved in 1998 and i have no problem with Lindstrom in 2002 winning.
Belfour went to the finals the first time in 1992, he had a good run until the Penguins got the best of him and the Blackhawks in the finals, after that he was just phenomenal in both Dallas run, he got the best of Fuhr, Roy and Hasek in 1999, and the year after he was even more amazing winning by himself against the Avalanche, the Stars were getting dominated but Eddie completely stole the series. In the finals with exception of Game 1 he was fantastic too, and looked much more impressive than Brodeur.
Hasek was the only reason the Sabres went to the Stanley Cup Finals in 1999, and he was pretty solid in 2002 (way more than Vernon in 1997), you can make a case for him, like you can make for Fedorov, Lindstrom, Shanahan and Yzerman, and even Forsberg whose team was not even in the Stanley Cup Finals.
Last edited: