Women's hockey is still in it's infancy in comparison to men so the comparison isn't really fair. Men have been playing hockey for a century. Whereas women's hockey teams didn't even exist when Hillary Knight, a current olympian was growing up. To the people saying their 13 year old hockey team beat a women's national team in the 90's that is an extremely inaccurate standard to hold women to hold women to today. that was 25 years ago, and considering women's hockey is on the rise and still growing that isn't valid. Women have come a far way in 25 years. Although Women's hockey is still in it's infancy it has improved a lot in the past 25 years. Up until last year the women's program didn't have half the funding that goes into the mens program and their youth programs. I attended a NEPSAC boarding school. I played on the women's hockey at my boarding school and we played against a team with Cayla Barnes, captain of USA's U18 team and she kept up with a bunch of the varsity guys of her prep school. Stop using outdated examples when comparing mens and women's hockey. Look at Hillary Knight for an example.