I am going to have to stop watching for a while. I am being more pessimistic/moody instead of it being fun for me. Just can’t watch this tank job.
Implying Johnny is complaining about his centers? I have no idea how the question was worded
Okay this pisses me off. Larsen is calling players out now after his coaching has been amateurish. Now he is going to the media about players because his seat is getting hot. Not a way to win over players.
I would venture to guess Johnny Hockey could coach this team better than Larsen. Also seems to me he was producing all of those years and now Larsen acts like he can coach him better and wants Johnny to shoulder the whole team. When his exact words in the beginning of the season he said he didn’t want him to shoulder the load for the entire team.
Btw, there is a possibility that since the game couldn't be saved, players like Gaudreau, Laine (but I didn't really watch him after the 5th goal), etc., will play less so they don't possibly get injured.
Question. Where I can find shifts players in periods? I can find it neither Moneypuck nor Natural Stat Trick.
That’s on pace for 42 goals if he played a full season. With 11-13 minutes of toi. The guy is a legit scorer.Marchenko with 9 goals in 17 games.
Ever since McElligott started doing the radio I've had the sense that he's been expecting/hoping to be Rimer's successor. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see him leave the organisation if they decided to replace Rimer with someone else.Side note about Jody and Rimer, Jody seems to be carrying Rims even more of late. It's gotta be frustrating. This franchise really needs a new play by play guy. Bucci would be the dream.
I like Bob but not sure he's really that much of an upgrade. I definitely envision this team promoting him as the replacement since half our staff are former players who've never done their job before. Bob has been "developing" with the radio call.Ever since McElligott started doing the radio I've had the sense that he's been expecting/hoping to be Rimer's successor. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see him leave the organisation if they decided to replace Rimer with someone else.
Not a big fan of his calls but I can imagine him being a tolerable announcer provided Bally/Fox then demanded him to drop "and I've got two words for ya! Game over!" and rest of his corny phrases from the pbp.I like Bob but not sure he's really that much of an upgrade. I definitely envision this team promoting him as the replacement since half our staff are former players who've never done their job before. Bob has been "developing" with the radio call.
What's there to say about Larsen at this point? Guy is trying his best he's just not an NHL coach. You can't just coach "effort" at this level and expect victories. He doesn't have the guys to compete right now but I don't think he's ever really proven to be a good coach with a healthy roster. It took how long for him to change practice styles and now the team finally looks fast? Roughly 4 months?
In this game I thought Laine did a good job, certainly didn't look ineffective. In fact that second line was pretty good overall, they had their offensive moments and scored a couple. The first line and Johnny were invisible for the most part.Johnny is probably annoyed with losing and having Laine turn over pucks. Patrik needs to find his game again. He looks very slow and ineffective. You could say that about a lot of players though.
This makes too much sense. It almost sounds like... developing young players?Better matchups. If he's out there with the first or second line he's going to be seeing tougher matchups. He gets pushed down and Larsen is trying to allow him to get more looks against lesser opponents. Gets his confidence going, but on the flip side Johnny and KJ need a body like Marchenkos on their line.
Not a big fan of his calls but I can imagine him being a tolerable announcer provided Bally/Fox then demanded him to drop "and I've got two words for ya! Game over!" and rest of his corny phrases from the pbp.
An upgrade for sure but listening to him will become tiresome very soon if he's more interested to take the role of comedian with the jokes, mannerisms and casual chatting instead of trying to describe actual game events.Bob is sharp-witted and in control. I'd be eager to take him just to move on from Rims. Is there a better alternative, I don't know, but he's an upgrade.
An upgrade for sure but listening to him will become tiresome very soon if he's more interested to take the role of comedian with the jokes, mannerisms and casual chatting instead of trying to describe actual game events.
Agreed but then…I think some of that is just radio vs tv.
Agreed but then…
Bob seems actually suited in other ways to TV. He doesn’t give the score and time enough for radio and he drifts off-topic which is fine if I’m watching what’s happening but not if I’m relying on him to let me know what’s going on.
It's an overall theme. Not just this game, in fact the team is able to now score a couple goals, thats an improvement! I guess...Is there something from this game that we're blaming Larsen for? Should he not be encouraging effort, and is there some other path he could take where we would expect to win this game?
I'm not necessarily making excuses for Larsen, but we had maybe 7 or 8 games before players started dropping like flies while trying to implement a new offenseIt's an overall theme. Not just this game, in fact the team is able to now score a couple goals, thats an improvement! I guess...
His overall ideas clearly do not work, once again this team was bad even fully healthy. There's no clear system in place and the team gets dominated for the majority of games. They have recently just changed their practice style and it has shown dividends. How the hell did it take this long to make an adjustment? Thats not an NHL coach who is aware of what needs to be done.
What are Larsen's ideas that are supposed to bring about victories? Or do we just think you need the best roster and not be outskated?
Once again, I'm talking about up to this point in the season. Not a small sample size of one night.
I'm not necessarily making excuses for Larsen, but we had maybe 7 or 8 games before players started dropping like flies while trying to implement a new offense
I wasn’t aware there was a new offense . Heard they were running a new defensive system ?I'm not necessarily making excuses for Larsen, but we had maybe 7 or 8 games before players started dropping like flies while trying to implement a new offense
This is sort of where I land, I can't justify blaming him squarely for this season's results, but he certainly hasn't done anything to instill confidence moving forward... I won't be horrified if they keep him next year, but would probably lean toward replacing him assuming a good alternative is available (and wants to coach the Jackets). The assumption there is key.
When you land a league leading scorer after not having a single player go over what, 60-70 points least season, your offensive plans change.I wasn’t aware there was a new offense . Heard they were running a new defensive system ?
Barring us going on say a 15-20 game losing streak, I think the FO keeps him through the off-season.I think we definitely need a new coach. Lars had to be prodded to hold the players accountable, it's just not in his nature to push them hard. Maybe he'll learn from this and become a great coach but it will require lack leaving Columbus, he's lost his voice here.
These are 100% my thoughts. I'm guessing most everyone's expectation is that Lars gets fired but I think he has a chance for next year (on that short leash).Barring us going on say a 15-20 game losing streak, I think the FO keeps him through the off-season.
That being said I think he would be on an extremely, EXTREMELY short leash.
I also wouldn't be surprised for him to be fired the day after our last game.. I think the next 3 months will really determine that answer.