Saxon Eric
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2005
- 20,764
- 29,003
This blows
You know me,I want them allWas never an option for Boston. It was all about burning a year off his ELC for him.
Yup top of the food chain guys are making it countWas never an option for Boston. It was all about burning a year off his ELC for him.
So do I dammit. So do I!!You know me,I want them all
Yup top of the food chain guys are making it count
He's on the Regular NAHL team. #9 Wilson.That's awesome for him! So cool! My son (10U) plays in that rink a lot and my really good friend is the Gens' team photographer, so I'm seeing bits and pieces of loads of games pretty often. They have the regular NAHL team, an N3HL team and both 18U and 16U development teams - which does he play for?
For the top guys like Gaber, Livingstone types yes for others that won't command that type of love can be signed to an ATO to finish the year out,then their "real" contract takes effect in OctoberWith them being at 49 contracts can the Bruins only sign one college/euro FA?
Awesome did not know thatFor the top guys like Gaber, Livingstone types yes for others that won't command that type of love can be signed to an ATO to finish the year out,then their "real" contract takes effect in October
For the top guys like Gaber, Livingstone types yes for others that won't command that type of love can be signed to an ATO to finish the year out,then their "real" contract takes effect in October
Not saying it was the right thing to do but the Bruins already set precedence with McLaughlin, I've got Gaber rated very high,I'd do it but then again Boston might try and use it on McAllister type, younger, higher ceilingI would absolutely not give Gaber a contract that burns a year off his entry level deal . He is a tiny soon to be 24 year old player. i know he has skill and a shot to make it, but I hink he is going to need time in the AHL for sure
Couldn't agree more. It's not like they aren't talking to players/advisors to see who has interest in the Bruins and what it will take. Once they have completed their talks, they'll evaluate and decide if it's worth giving one player the option to burn a year over another and then make their move.Not saying it was the right thing to do but the Bruins already set precedence with McLaughlin, I've got Gaber rated very high,I'd do it but then again Boston might try and use it on McAllister type, younger, higher ceiling