BKIslandersFan
F*** off
But how much are they willing to pay? Rockies do have an option of taking less and going to broadcast TV network like Golden Knights did.I'm sure that's what Altitude wants to get a deal again with Comcast
But how much are they willing to pay? Rockies do have an option of taking less and going to broadcast TV network like Golden Knights did.I'm sure that's what Altitude wants to get a deal again with Comcast
That's a great question and I'm not sure how much they're willing to pay but the Rockies may not have too many optinsBut how much are they willing to pay? Rockies do have an option of taking less and going to broadcast TV network like Golden Knights did.
That's a great question and I'm not sure how much they're willing to pay but the Rockies may not have too many optins
Sorry, there's a lot going on in this thread. I'm just curious, anyone have $$ amounts of what the Suns will make from the OTA deal they made versus what they were getting from Bally?
I just don't feel like OTA $$ will be the same, but I could be wrong on that.
This is a huge shift in the landscape of sports, as NBA, MLB, NHL all rely in some part(some more than others) on the money from RSN deals. It'll be interesting to see what happens down the road. Before, you had the option to get the RSN and have all your local sports on their really. Now, you're going to have to pick and choose, it'll wind up being more expensive IMO than it was previously.
Fans who do not have Bally Sports West and/or KCAL-TV options available to them will be able to subscribe to Bally Sports+ to receive all the games available on Bally Sports West and KCAL-TV as part of the Bally Sports+ streaming subscription.
Off topic: What’s with the 20 year old photo of Chris Pronger and the Blues used in the story?Diamond looking to salvage what little they have left......
(Not going to end well IMNSHO)
Exclusive | Diamond Sports seeks to cut NBA, NHL fees in last-ditch bid to survive another year: sources
The Sinclair subsidiary, which declared bankruptcy in March with $9 billion in debt, owns the broadcast rights to 15 NBA teams and 12 NHL teams as both leagues prepare to open their seasons next mo…nypost.com
Yep this is why I scratch at my head at sports fan bashing cable when cable was the best thing to happen for sport fans.Sorry, there's a lot going on in this thread. I'm just curious, anyone have $$ amounts of what the Suns will make from the OTA deal they made versus what they were getting from Bally?
I just don't feel like OTA $$ will be the same, but I could be wrong on that.
This is a huge shift in the landscape of sports, as NBA, MLB, NHL all rely in some part(some more than others) on the money from RSN deals. It'll be interesting to see what happens down the road. Before, you had the option to get the RSN and have all your local sports on their really. Now, you're going to have to pick and choose, it'll wind up being more expensive IMO than it was previously.
Well according the article is Bally's told NBA and NHL they want them to take a 20% bulk cut across their teams. The New York Post said the Financials for NBA 15 teams who have deals with Diamond is $600m annually so and the 20% cut would save Diamond $120m yr. That's a $8m yr on average per team loss of annual revenue for 50% of NBA teams. They're upcoming TV deal with soften that blow, though NY Post thinks it will hurt the NBA cap.I’m curious how much revenue will be lost after new deals are completed.
As that is part of HRR and the 50/50 split.
Well if it is 60 million lost , that would mean about a 1 million lower cap.Well according the article is Bally's told NBA and NHL they want them to take a 20% bulk cut across their teams. The New York Post said the Financials for NBA 15 teams who have deals with Diamond is $600m annually so and the 20% cut would save Diamond $120m yr. That's a $8m yr on average per team loss of annual revenue for 50% of NBA teams. They're upcoming TV deal with soften that blow, though NY Post thinks it will hurt the NBA cap.
The big question is how much was Diamond paying NHL's 12 teams you'd have to think at least half so call it $300m yr. A 20% cut would be a reduction of $60m yr. That's a $5m yr on average per team loss of annual revenue for almost 40% of NHL teams.
The more telling fact of how dire things are is the NY Post citing the NBA/NHL are going along with this largely because cited they aren't prepared for it. Diamond has said if this doesn't will dispose of under performing teams to balance accounts.
Ultimately feel we might see a temporary increase in the cap before an adjustment back down. Maybe domeome here with more known the cap can share their views.
I've been back and forth on this but hockey fans should be cheering on Diamond to do better financially because if Diamond starts deciding they need to cut a team or two away to stay viaable that could prove to be a issue. Worst case obviously is Diamond goes belly up.Well if it is 60 million lost , that would mean about a 1 million lower cap.
I've been back and forth on this but hockey fans should be cheering on Diamond to do better financially because if Diamond starts deciding they need to cut a team or two away to stay viaable that could prove to be a issue. Worst case obviously is Diamond goes belly up.
Diamond Sports seeks to cut NBA, NHL fees in last-ditch bid to survive another year: sourcesDiamond will go belly up.
Right now they’re just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Diamond Sports seeks to cut NBA, NHL fees in last-ditch bid to survive another year: sources
That would be a monumental heavy blow. Which is why it seems NBA/NHL aren't making such a stink about the 20% cut they're being asked to take. 80% $480m of $600m in local rights payments for the NBA is better than 0%.
For the NHL assuming the NHL is getting at minimum half $300m of the $600m the NBA is getting 80% $240m is also better than 0%. The heavy lift of having to come up with equal media revenue to replace Diamond while having to spend to produce broadcast and sell packages could be too much unless they partner with a big media partner to share the cost burden.
Doubling reach is good but the problem is turning reach into viewers and monetizing that.In Arizona the DBacks and Suns/Mercury have already jumped ship because they will end up at least doubling their reach area. That just leaves the Coyotes.
And I can tell you in the case of the Coyotes they are already looking elsewhere. Their 10 year deal with Bally’s (which originated with Fox Sports) ends after this season.
I’m sure other teams are going to look closely at what these teams have already done and go a similar route.
It’s not a matter of IF anymore…. It’s a matter of WHEN.
Doubling reach is good but the problem is turning reach into viewers and monetizing that.
Doubling reach is good but the problem is turning reach into viewers and monetizing that.
The solution is ads. If you could have an app with 1 million people watching 82 games for free, or an app where 100,000 people are watching 82 games for $10/mo, the higher ad revenue can close that gap. The app itself should be the "loss leader" that gets people in the door and invested.This is the new reality in such simplistic terms. You have to pick "reaching and making fans" or "getting the most money from existing fans" in the new regional sports TV revenue reality.
How much room do they have for ads before it just becomes noise and nothing else? I'm already there myself and I couldn't name a single sponsor of my favorite team outside Bridgestone even though I watch every game and had season tickets through this past season. I just don't understand how advertisers get return on what they are paying for these ads at this point.The solution is ads. If you could have an app with 1 million people watching 82 games for free, or an app where 100,000 people are watching 82 games for $10/mo, the higher ad revenue can close that gap. The app itself should be the "loss leader" that gets people in the door and invested.
It's a rehash of the NY Post article but see details.Bally Sports Reportedly Hopes to Strike Deals With YouTube TV & Hulu To Save The Channel | Cord Cutters News
Last week, The New York Post reported that a deal had been reached between Comcast and DIRECTV to extend Bally Sports’ contracts with the pay-TV providers. Cord Cutters News has since independently confirmed the news. Now, the Wall Street Journal reports that Diamond Sports, the parent company...cordcuttersnews.com
Tampa's Bally deal was only $15M as of 2021 (Calculating an NHL team's finances and plan for expanding revenue)The big question is how much was Diamond paying NHL's 12 teams you'd have to think at least half so call it $300m yr. A 20% cut would be a reduction of $60m yr. That's a $5m yr on average per team loss of annual revenue for almost 40% of NHL teams.