Confirmed Trade: [COL/SJS] Mackenzie Blackwood, Givani Smith, 2027 5th for Alexandar Georgiev (14% ret.), Nikolai Kovalenko, 2026 2nd, cond. 2025 4th

Jixer19

Registered User
Dec 19, 2015
1,158
1,061
Edmonton, Alberta
I know Blackwood won't stay this good (or maybe he can, one can hope?), but what a breath of fresh air he has been in the net (alongside Wedgewood as well), so thank you Sharks and glad to hear Kovalenko has been doing good and truly hope he excels for you all, was excited when he joined the team and shows promise
 

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,800
10,321
BC
Not saying he is a top 5 goaltender, but he has been really good the past 2 seasons.

Looking at sv % while playing behind a historically bad Sharks defense last season is not going to tell you the story of how well he played. The bump he got this year was due to a better (but still bad) surrounding cast. The Sharks are the 3rd worst team in the league this season and yet Blackwood is 9th in Sv % for goalies with a reasonable sample size. Given the frequent defensive lapses that have plagued the Sharks, folks who haven’t watched him play won’t appreciate just how impressive that is.
My initial point was that if Blackwood was consistently that good he'd be a top 5 goaltender, and your response insinuated he was already playing like that but nobody watched him.

SV% doesn't tell the whole story, I agree. But there is value in comparing it to the other goalie he splits starts with and only had a .04% better SV% - which I was hoping to get a better explanation for and you kind of skirted around it.

Just looking to understand why you think he's been more consistent than his numbers have suggested. Would be ecstatic if that's the case because his first few games with the Avs have been phenomenal, but my current expectation is that he won't consistently play like that throughout a full season and he'll have ups and downs.
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,886
4,560
My initial point was that if Blackwood was consistently that good he'd be a top 5 goaltender, and your response insinuated he was already playing like that but nobody watched him.

SV% doesn't tell the whole story, I agree. But there is value in comparing it to the other goalie he splits starts with and only had a .04% better SV% - which I was hoping to get a better explanation for and you kind of skirted around it.

Just looking to understand why you think he's been more consistent than his numbers have suggested. Would be ecstatic if that's the case because his first few games with the Avs have been phenomenal, but my current expectation is that he won't consistently play like that throughout a full season and he'll have ups and downs.
Blackwood has played very consistently for the Sharks, but I don’t think most people truly appreciate just how bad the Sharks D was last season. My sense is the two goalies sv% almost approached a “floor” where it couldn’t get much worse.

Blackwood played behind a better but still really bad Sharks team this season and was 9th in sv % among NHL regulars prior to the trade.

Top 5? Maybe not, but being 9th on a bottom feeder puts you in the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAZ

Ncit3

Registered User
Oct 19, 2011
3,435
3,886
Colorado
Blackwood has played very consistently for the Sharks, but I don’t think most people truly appreciate just how bad the Sharks D was last season. My sense is the two goalies sv% almost approached a “floor” where it couldn’t get much worse.

Blackwood played behind a better but still really bad Sharks team this season and was 9th in sv % among NHL regulars prior to the trade.

Top 5? Maybe not, but being 9th on a bottom feeder puts you in the conversation.
Loving what I am seeing so far from him. He's been in position, tracking the puck well, and making expected saves. Something we haven't seen much in the last nearly two seasons. The last goalie to show that kind of consistency in Colorado was Francouz.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad