markpenske
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2015
- 1,607
- 768
He's an above replacement level body who can still play and can take faceoffs, depth that playoff caliber teams would want. I can imagine he'd go for a 5th with nothing retained and a 3rd if he's half off. That seems reasonable for both sides. If you're trading a second it should be in a package for a better player.this is a joke, right? Nobody actually wants Eakin......right?
He's an above replacement level body who can still play and can take faceoffs, depth that playoff caliber teams would want. I can imagine he'd go for a 5th with nothing retained and a 3rd if he's half off. That seems reasonable for both sides. If you're trading a second it should be in a package for a better player.
I understand he's not a sexy player.
lolDefinitely trailer park sexy...
Not a lot of positive responses.
Would Namestnikov work?
Sure. But… why? Isn’t he pretty valuable on your 3rd and one of your top PKers?
He's a UFA at years end. Probably won't be re-signed.
If that mullet isn't sexy then I don't know what is.He's an above replacement level body who can still play and can take faceoffs, depth that playoff caliber teams would want. I can imagine he'd go for a 5th with nothing retained and a 3rd if he's half off. That seems reasonable for both sides. If you're trading a second it should be in a package for a better player.
I understand he's not a sexy player.